@@ -196,27 +196,7 @@ enum {
#define BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SAFE_SET 0ULL
#define BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SAFE_CLEAR 0ULL
-#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
-/*
- * Extent tree v2 supported only with CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
- */
-#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP \
- (BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DEFAULT_SUBVOL | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_BIG_METADATA | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_LZO | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_ZSTD | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID56 | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENDED_IREF | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SKINNY_METADATA | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_NO_HOLES | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID1C34 | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ZONED | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V2)
-#else
-#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP \
+#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP_STABLE \
(BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DEFAULT_SUBVOL | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS | \
@@ -230,6 +210,20 @@ enum {
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID1C34 | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ZONED)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
+ /*
+ * Developing features like
+ * Extent tree v2 support
+ * is enabled only under CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
+ */
+ #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP \
+ (BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP_STABLE | \
+ BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V2)
+
+#else
+ #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP \
+ (BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP_STABLE)
#endif
#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SAFE_SET \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP is defined twice, once under CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG and once without it, resulting in repetitive code. The reason for this is to add experimental features under CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG. To avoid repetitive code, add a common list BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP_STABLE, and append experimental features only under CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- Also, Would it be advisable to add a new Kconfig define labeled as EXPERIMENTAL? I don't believe it is, since if no new features are introduced, removing the Kconfig would not be a viable option. fs/btrfs/fs.h | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)