| Message ID | 20230310144726.1545543-1-robh@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence | expand |
On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote: > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > for presence of a property and nothing more. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > for presence of a property and nothing more. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Daniel, are you going to apply this, or should I take it directly? > --- > drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > index 9f8b438fcf8f..4608555b7ec3 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > return NULL; > } > > - if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { > + if (of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { > struct em_perf_domain *em = em_cpu_get(policy->cpu); > > cdev = __cpufreq_cooling_register(np, policy, em); > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > index 72b5d6f319c1..334ce8e9830b 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int imx8mm_tmu_probe_set_calib(struct platform_device *pdev, > * strongly recommended to update such old DTs to get correct > * temperature compensation values for each SoC. > */ > - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { > + if (!of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { > dev_warn(dev, > "No OCOTP nvmem reference found, SoC-specific calibration not loaded. Please update your DT.\n"); > return 0; > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > index fb0d5cab70af..77d6567a3f47 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data) > > np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL); > > - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { > + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { > data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy); > if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev); > @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); > > - if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { > + if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { > ret = imx_init_from_nvmem_cells(pdev); > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > index 8a9055bd376e..dace6591220e 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) > * using DT, then it must be aware that the cooling device > * loading has to happen via cpufreq driver. > */ > - if (of_find_property(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells", NULL)) > + if (of_property_present(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells")) > return 0; > > data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id); > -- > 2.39.2 >
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > > for presence of a property and nothing more. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > Daniel, are you going to apply this, or should I take it directly? Applied as 6.4 material, thanks! > > --- > > drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +- > > drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c | 2 +- > > drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > > index 9f8b438fcf8f..4608555b7ec3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > > @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > return NULL; > > } > > > > - if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { > > + if (of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { > > struct em_perf_domain *em = em_cpu_get(policy->cpu); > > > > cdev = __cpufreq_cooling_register(np, policy, em); > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > > index 72b5d6f319c1..334ce8e9830b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int imx8mm_tmu_probe_set_calib(struct platform_device *pdev, > > * strongly recommended to update such old DTs to get correct > > * temperature compensation values for each SoC. > > */ > > - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { > > + if (!of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { > > dev_warn(dev, > > "No OCOTP nvmem reference found, SoC-specific calibration not loaded. Please update your DT.\n"); > > return 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > > index fb0d5cab70af..77d6567a3f47 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c > > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data) > > > > np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL); > > > > - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { > > + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { > > data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy); > > if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) { > > ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev); > > @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); > > > > - if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { > > + if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { > > ret = imx_init_from_nvmem_cells(pdev); > > if (ret) > > return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > > index 8a9055bd376e..dace6591220e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) > > * using DT, then it must be aware that the cooling device > > * loading has to happen via cpufreq driver. > > */ > > - if (of_find_property(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells", NULL)) > > + if (of_property_present(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells")) > > return 0; > > > > data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id); > > -- > > 2.39.2 > >
On 30/03/2023 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: >>> >>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. >>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level >>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As >>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the >>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test >>> for presence of a property and nothing more. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> >> Daniel, are you going to apply this, or should I take it directly? > > Applied as 6.4 material, thanks Sorry, I forgot to answer. I already applied it. Shall I drop it from my branch ?
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:44 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 30/03/2023 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > >>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > >>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > >>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > >>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > >>> for presence of a property and nothing more. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > >> > >> Daniel, are you going to apply this, or should I take it directly? > > > > Applied as 6.4 material, thanks > > Sorry, I forgot to answer. I already applied it. > > Shall I drop it from my branch ? If you can do that, then yes, please.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c index 9f8b438fcf8f..4608555b7ec3 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return NULL; } - if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { + if (of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { struct em_perf_domain *em = em_cpu_get(policy->cpu); cdev = __cpufreq_cooling_register(np, policy, em); diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c index 72b5d6f319c1..334ce8e9830b 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int imx8mm_tmu_probe_set_calib(struct platform_device *pdev, * strongly recommended to update such old DTs to get correct * temperature compensation values for each SoC. */ - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { + if (!of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { dev_warn(dev, "No OCOTP nvmem reference found, SoC-specific calibration not loaded. Please update your DT.\n"); return 0; diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c index fb0d5cab70af..77d6567a3f47 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data) np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL); - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#cooling-cells")) { data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy); if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) { ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev); @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); - if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) { + if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvmem-cells")) { ret = imx_init_from_nvmem_cells(pdev); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c index 8a9055bd376e..dace6591220e 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) * using DT, then it must be aware that the cooling device * loading has to happen via cpufreq driver. */ - if (of_find_property(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells", NULL)) + if (of_property_present(np, "#thermal-sensor-cells")) return 0; data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +- drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c | 2 +- drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)