Message ID | 20230317182538.3027-1-zeming@nfschina.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] io_uring: rsrc: Optimize return value variable 'ret' | expand |
On 3/17/23 12:25 PM, Li zeming wrote: > The initialization assignment of the variable ret is changed to 0, only > in 'goto fail;' Use the ret variable as the function return value. Applied - normally I'd just sent the usual auto-generated email, but wanted to let you know that the previous email and this email are all sent from the future. You need to fix your date/time on your end.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:25:38 +0800, Li zeming wrote: > The initialization assignment of the variable ret is changed to 0, only > in 'goto fail;' Use the ret variable as the function return value. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] io_uring: rsrc: Optimize return value variable 'ret' commit: 6acd352dfee558194643adbed7e849fe80fd1b93 Best regards,
diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c index 056f40946ff6..09a16d709cb5 100644 --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ __cold static int io_rsrc_data_alloc(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned nr, struct io_rsrc_data **pdata) { struct io_rsrc_data *data; - int ret = -ENOMEM; + int ret = 0; unsigned i; data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
The initialization assignment of the variable ret is changed to 0, only in 'goto fail;' Use the ret variable as the function return value. Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@nfschina.com> --- v2: Modify the initialization value of ret variable. io_uring/rsrc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)