diff mbox series

[RFC,6/7] workingset: memcg: sleep when flushing stats in workingset_refault()

Message ID 20230323040037.2389095-7-yosryahmed@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Make rstat flushing IRQ and sleep friendly | expand

Commit Message

Yosry Ahmed March 23, 2023, 4 a.m. UTC
In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() to
flush stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed.
Move the call to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() above the RCU read
section and allow sleeping to avoid unnecessarily performing a lot of
work without sleeping.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
---

A lot of code paths call into workingset_refault(), so I am not
generally sure at all whether it's okay to sleep in all contexts or not.
Feedback here would be very helpful.

---
 mm/workingset.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Johannes Weiner March 23, 2023, 3:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:00:36AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() to
> flush stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed.
> Move the call to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() above the RCU read
> section and allow sleeping to avoid unnecessarily performing a lot of
> work without sleeping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> ---
> 
> A lot of code paths call into workingset_refault(), so I am not
> generally sure at all whether it's okay to sleep in all contexts or not.
> Feedback here would be very helpful.

Yes, it's safe.
Johannes Weiner March 23, 2023, 4 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:00:36AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() to
> flush stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed.
> Move the call to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() above the RCU read
> section and allow sleeping to avoid unnecessarily performing a lot of
> work without sleeping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> ---
> 
> A lot of code paths call into workingset_refault(), so I am not
> generally sure at all whether it's okay to sleep in all contexts or not.
> Feedback here would be very helpful.
> 
> ---
>  mm/workingset.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
> index 042eabbb43f6..410bc6684ea7 100644
> --- a/mm/workingset.c
> +++ b/mm/workingset.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
>  	unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &eviction, &workingset);
>  	eviction <<= bucket_order;
>  
> +	/* Flush stats (and potentially sleep) before holding RCU read lock */
> +	mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed(true);

Btw, it might be a good time to rename this while you're in the
area. delayed suggests this is using a delayed_work, but this is
actually sometimes flushing directly from the callsite.

What it's doing is ratelimited calls. A better name would be:

	mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited()
Yosry Ahmed March 23, 2023, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:50 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:00:36AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() to
> > flush stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed.
> > Move the call to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() above the RCU read
> > section and allow sleeping to avoid unnecessarily performing a lot of
> > work without sleeping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> > ---
> >
> > A lot of code paths call into workingset_refault(), so I am not
> > generally sure at all whether it's okay to sleep in all contexts or not.
> > Feedback here would be very helpful.
>
> Yes, it's safe.

Thanks! That's very helpful!
Yosry Ahmed March 23, 2023, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 9:00 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:00:36AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() to
> > flush stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed.
> > Move the call to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() above the RCU read
> > section and allow sleeping to avoid unnecessarily performing a lot of
> > work without sleeping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> > ---
> >
> > A lot of code paths call into workingset_refault(), so I am not
> > generally sure at all whether it's okay to sleep in all contexts or not.
> > Feedback here would be very helpful.
> >
> > ---
> >  mm/workingset.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
> > index 042eabbb43f6..410bc6684ea7 100644
> > --- a/mm/workingset.c
> > +++ b/mm/workingset.c
> > @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
> >       unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &eviction, &workingset);
> >       eviction <<= bucket_order;
> >
> > +     /* Flush stats (and potentially sleep) before holding RCU read lock */
> > +     mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed(true);
>
> Btw, it might be a good time to rename this while you're in the
> area. delayed suggests this is using a delayed_work, but this is
> actually sometimes flushing directly from the callsite.
>
> What it's doing is ratelimited calls. A better name would be:
>
>         mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited()

Agreed. Will do in the next version.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 042eabbb43f6..410bc6684ea7 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -406,6 +406,8 @@  void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
 	unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &eviction, &workingset);
 	eviction <<= bucket_order;
 
+	/* Flush stats (and potentially sleep) before holding RCU read lock */
+	mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed(true);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*
 	 * Look up the memcg associated with the stored ID. It might
@@ -461,9 +463,6 @@  void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
 	lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
 
 	mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_BASE + file, nr);
-
-	/* Do not sleep with RCU lock held */
-	mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed(false);
 	/*
 	 * Compare the distance to the existing workingset size. We
 	 * don't activate pages that couldn't stay resident even if