| Message ID | 20230323-topic-sm8450-upstream-dt-bindings-fixes-v1-7-3ead1e418fe4@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: qcom: sm8450: bindings check cleanup | expand |
On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Fixes the following DT bindings check error: > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { > "jedec,ufs-2.0"; > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, > <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; > - reg-names = "std", "ice"; This is also part of: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi, On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Fixes the following DT bindings check error: >> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) >> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { >> "jedec,ufs-2.0"; >> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, >> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; >> - reg-names = "std", "ice"; > > This is also part of: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT, and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names. Neil > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
Hi Neil, On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error: > > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { > > > "jedec,ufs-2.0"; > > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, > > > <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; > > > - reg-names = "std", "ice"; > > > > This is also part of: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi > > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? > > I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT, > and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names. > The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that patch got missed, though: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com - Eric
On 24/03/2023 07:52, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error: >>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - >>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { >>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0"; >>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, >>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; >>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice"; >>> >>> This is also part of: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi >>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? >> >> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT, >> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names. >> > > The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't > be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the > device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that > patch got missed, though: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com Exactly. This is why I never saw these warnings. Neil, there are a lot of pending patches, so you need to be sure you run dtbs_check with them applied. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Eric, On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error: > > > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - > > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > > > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { > > > > "jedec,ufs-2.0"; > > > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, > > > > <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; > > > > - reg-names = "std", "ice"; > > > > > > This is also part of: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi > > > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? > > > > I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT, > > and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names. > > > > The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't > be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the > device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that > patch got missed, though: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure who to bug about applying this patch. Regards Luca > > - Eric
On 24/03/2023 08:26, Luca Weiss wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote: >> Hi Neil, >> >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error: >>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { >>>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0"; >>>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, >>>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; >>>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice"; >>>> >>>> This is also part of: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi >>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch? >>> >>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT, >>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names. >>> >> >> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't >> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the >> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that >> patch got missed, though: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com > > Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure > who to bug about applying this patch. Yes, you should. It has been almost three months... Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 { "jedec,ufs-2.0"; reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>, <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>; - reg-names = "std", "ice"; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>; phy-names = "ufsphy";
Fixes the following DT bindings check error: ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected) Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)