| Message ID | 1679910560-23469-1-git-send-email-quic_taozha@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | coresight: cti: Check if the CPU activated for the CPU CTI | expand |
On 27/03/2023 10:49, Tao Zhang wrote: > Check whether the CPU corresponding to the CPU CTI is activated. > If it is not activated, the CPU CTI node should not exist, and > an error will be returned in the initialization function. > > Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c > index 277c890..aaa83ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c > @@ -899,10 +899,12 @@ static int cti_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > drvdata->config.hw_powered = true; > > /* set up device name - will depend if cpu bound or otherwise */ > - if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) > + if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) { > + if (!cpu_active(drvdata->ctidev.cpu)) > + return -ENXIO; > cti_desc.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "cti_cpu%d", > drvdata->ctidev.cpu); But why ? As long as we do not enable or touch any CPU specific bits in the probe, why do we need to fail this ? What are you trying to fix ? Please could you share the log if you are hitting something ? This looks like masking a problem. Suzuki > - else > + } else > cti_desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&cti_sys_devs, dev); > if (!cti_desc.name) > return -ENOMEM;
On 27/03/2023 15:28, Tao Zhang wrote: > Hi Suzuki, > > On 3/27/2023 5:52 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 27/03/2023 10:49, Tao Zhang wrote: >>> Check whether the CPU corresponding to the CPU CTI is activated. >>> If it is not activated, the CPU CTI node should not exist, and >>> an error will be returned in the initialization function. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 6 ++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c >>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c >>> index 277c890..aaa83ae 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c >>> @@ -899,10 +899,12 @@ static int cti_probe(struct amba_device *adev, >>> const struct amba_id *id) >>> drvdata->config.hw_powered = true; >>> /* set up device name - will depend if cpu bound or otherwise */ >>> - if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) >>> + if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) { >>> + if (!cpu_active(drvdata->ctidev.cpu)) >>> + return -ENXIO; >>> cti_desc.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "cti_cpu%d", >>> drvdata->ctidev.cpu); >> >> But why ? As long as we do not enable or touch any CPU specific bits >> in the probe, why do we need to fail this ? What are you trying to fix ? >> >> Please could you share the log if you are hitting something ? This looks >> like masking a problem. >> >> Suzuki > > We found that when the CPU core is disabled, for example, CPU3 is > disabled, but > > CPU3 CTI node corresponding to CPU3 still exists. In fact, in this case, > CPU3 CTI > > has been unable to trigger CPU3 properly since CPU3 is in an inactive > state. This change > > is to avoid configuring the CPU CTI of the CPU that has been disabled in > this case. Who is configuring the trigger ? Shouldn't we skip "enabling" the CTI when the associated CPU is inactive instead ? Disabling the probe with an error doesn't solve the problem. What if the CPU becomes active later ? What makes sure that the CTI is probed then ? Suzuki > > Tao > >> >> >>> - else >>> + } else >>> cti_desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&cti_sys_devs, >>> dev); >>> if (!cti_desc.name) >>> return -ENOMEM; >>
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c index 277c890..aaa83ae 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c @@ -899,10 +899,12 @@ static int cti_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) drvdata->config.hw_powered = true; /* set up device name - will depend if cpu bound or otherwise */ - if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) + if (drvdata->ctidev.cpu >= 0) { + if (!cpu_active(drvdata->ctidev.cpu)) + return -ENXIO; cti_desc.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "cti_cpu%d", drvdata->ctidev.cpu); - else + } else cti_desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&cti_sys_devs, dev); if (!cti_desc.name) return -ENOMEM;
Check whether the CPU corresponding to the CPU CTI is activated. If it is not activated, the CPU CTI node should not exist, and an error will be returned in the initialization function. Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com> --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)