| Message ID | 20230328053853.23159-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [-next] devfreq: exynos-ppmu: Use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() | expand |
On 28/03/2023 07:38, Yang Li wrote: > According to commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()"), convert I don't understand why do you reference this commit. There is no bug introduced there, there is nothing related to this driver. > platform_get_resource(), devm_ioremap_resource() to a single > call to devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly > what this function does. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi, On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2023 07:38, Yang Li wrote: > > According to commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide > > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()"), convert > > I don't understand why do you reference this commit. There is no bug > introduced there, there is nothing related to this driver. > > > platform_get_resource(), devm_ioremap_resource() to a single > > call to devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly > > what this function does. I've seen Yang has sent many of these cleanups, perhaps he can write something like: " Commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()") introduces the devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() function which combines both platform_get_resource() and devm_ioremap_resource() into a single call. Update the code to use the new combined function instead of the separate calls. " With that Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Thanks, Andi
On 28/03/2023 11:53, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 28/03/2023 07:38, Yang Li wrote: >>> According to commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide >>> devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()"), convert >> >> I don't understand why do you reference this commit. There is no bug >> introduced there, there is nothing related to this driver. >> >>> platform_get_resource(), devm_ioremap_resource() to a single >>> call to devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly >>> what this function does. > > I've seen Yang has sent many of these cleanups, perhaps he can > write something like: > > " > Commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()") introduces the > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() function which combines > both platform_get_resource() and devm_ioremap_resource() into a > single call. I don't think we need to reference that commit at all. It does not matter when the API was introduced and just makes commit msg unnecessary long. Instead the commit msg should shortly say why this change is needed or even worth accepting. > > Update the code to use the new combined function instead of the > separate calls. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.c index a443e7c42daf..896a6cc93b00 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.c @@ -621,8 +621,7 @@ static int exynos_ppmu_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, } /* Maps the memory mapped IO to control PPMU register */ - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res); if (IS_ERR(base)) return PTR_ERR(base);
According to commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()"), convert platform_get_resource(), devm_ioremap_resource() to a single call to devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly what this function does. Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)