Message ID | 20230328131047.2440-1-jgross@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | xen/netback: fix issue introduced recently | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>: On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:10:44 +0200 you wrote: > The fix for XSA-423 introduced a bug which resulted in loss of network > connection in some configurations. > > The first patch is fixing the issue, while the second one is removing > a test which isn't needed. The third patch is making error messages > more uniform. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,1/3] xen/netback: don't do grant copy across page boundary (no matching commit) - [v2,2/3] xen/netback: remove not needed test in xenvif_tx_build_gops() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/8fb8ebf94877 - [v2,3/3] xen/netback: use same error messages for same errors (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you!
Hi, On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 15:10 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > The fix for XSA-423 introduced a bug which resulted in loss of network > connection in some configurations. > > The first patch is fixing the issue, while the second one is removing > a test which isn't needed. The third patch is making error messages > more uniform. > > Changes in V2: > - add patch 3 > - comment addressed (patch 1) I misread the thread on v2 as the build_bug_on() was not needed and applied such revision. Please rebase any further change on top of current net. Thanks, Paolo
On 28.03.2023 15:52, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 15:10 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> The fix for XSA-423 introduced a bug which resulted in loss of network >> connection in some configurations. >> >> The first patch is fixing the issue, while the second one is removing >> a test which isn't needed. The third patch is making error messages >> more uniform. >> >> Changes in V2: >> - add patch 3 >> - comment addressed (patch 1) > > I misread the thread on v2 as the build_bug_on() was not needed and > applied such revision. I guess it's not the end of the world if we go forward without that extra check. It's a safeguard for theoretical future work which, as Jürgen says, isn't very likely to occur anyway. Jan