diff mbox series

remoteproc: pru: remove always true check positive unsigned value

Message ID 20230404-pru-always-true-v1-1-b1b55eeff188@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series remoteproc: pru: remove always true check positive unsigned value | expand

Commit Message

Simon Horman April 4, 2023, 12:44 p.m. UTC
In both cases they type of da is u32. And PRU_PDRAM_DA is 0.
So the check da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA is always true and can be removed.

Flagged by Smatch:

 drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:660 pru_d_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
 drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:709 pru_i_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'

No functional changes intended.
Compile tested only.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4025983.html
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Mukesh Ojha April 4, 2023, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #1
On 4/4/2023 6:14 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> In both cases they type of da is u32. And PRU_PDRAM_DA is 0.
> So the check da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA is always true and can be removed.
> 
> Flagged by Smatch:
> 
>   drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:660 pru_d_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
>   drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:709 pru_i_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> Compile tested only.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4025983.html
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> index b76db7fa693d..095f66130f48 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static void *pru_d_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
>   		swap(dram0, dram1);
>   	shrd_ram = pruss->mem_regions[PRUSS_MEM_SHRD_RAM2];
>   
> -	if (da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA && da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
> +	if (da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
>   		offset = da - PRU_PDRAM_DA;
>   		va = (__force void *)(dram0.va + offset);
>   	} else if (da >= PRU_SDRAM_DA &&
> @@ -706,8 +706,7 @@ static void *pru_i_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
>   	 */
>   	da &= 0xfffff;
>   
> -	if (da >= PRU_IRAM_DA &&
> -	    da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
> +	if (da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
>   		offset = da - PRU_IRAM_DA;
>   		va = (__force void *)(pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].va +

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>


--Mukesh
>   				      offset);
>
Mathieu Poirier April 5, 2023, 4:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> In both cases they type of da is u32. And PRU_PDRAM_DA is 0.
> So the check da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA is always true and can be removed.
> 
> Flagged by Smatch:
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:660 pru_d_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
>  drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c:709 pru_i_da_to_va() warn: always true condition '(da >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> Compile tested only.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4025983.html
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Applied

Thanks,
Mathieu


> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> index b76db7fa693d..095f66130f48 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static void *pru_d_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
>  		swap(dram0, dram1);
>  	shrd_ram = pruss->mem_regions[PRUSS_MEM_SHRD_RAM2];
>  
> -	if (da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA && da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
> +	if (da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
>  		offset = da - PRU_PDRAM_DA;
>  		va = (__force void *)(dram0.va + offset);
>  	} else if (da >= PRU_SDRAM_DA &&
> @@ -706,8 +706,7 @@ static void *pru_i_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
>  	 */
>  	da &= 0xfffff;
>  
> -	if (da >= PRU_IRAM_DA &&
> -	    da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
> +	if (da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
>  		offset = da - PRU_IRAM_DA;
>  		va = (__force void *)(pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].va +
>  				      offset);
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
index b76db7fa693d..095f66130f48 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@  static void *pru_d_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
 		swap(dram0, dram1);
 	shrd_ram = pruss->mem_regions[PRUSS_MEM_SHRD_RAM2];
 
-	if (da >= PRU_PDRAM_DA && da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
+	if (da + len <= PRU_PDRAM_DA + dram0.size) {
 		offset = da - PRU_PDRAM_DA;
 		va = (__force void *)(dram0.va + offset);
 	} else if (da >= PRU_SDRAM_DA &&
@@ -706,8 +706,7 @@  static void *pru_i_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, size_t len)
 	 */
 	da &= 0xfffff;
 
-	if (da >= PRU_IRAM_DA &&
-	    da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
+	if (da + len <= PRU_IRAM_DA + pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].size) {
 		offset = da - PRU_IRAM_DA;
 		va = (__force void *)(pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_IRAM].va +
 				      offset);