| Message ID | 20230503-b4-v6-3-topic-boards-imx8mm-evk-v1-1-1e15a371d374@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add i.MX8MM-EVKB Support | expand |
On 03/05/2023 17:20, Marco Felsch wrote: > From: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@leica-geosystems.com> > > Add DT compatible for the imx8mm EVKB [1]. > > [1] https://www.nxp.com/design/development-boards/ \ > i-mx-evaluation-and-development-boards/ \ > evaluation-kit-for-the-i-mx-8m-mini-applications-processor:8MMINILPD4-EVK > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@leica-geosystems.com> > [m.felsch@pengutronix.de: Adapt the commit message] > [m.felsch@pengutronix.de: Adapt the yaml comment] I don't see any differences. The comment is exactly the same as before. This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On 23-05-03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/05/2023 17:20, Marco Felsch wrote: > > From: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@leica-geosystems.com> > > > > Add DT compatible for the imx8mm EVKB [1]. > > > > [1] https://www.nxp.com/design/development-boards/ \ > > i-mx-evaluation-and-development-boards/ \ > > evaluation-kit-for-the-i-mx-8m-mini-applications-processor:8MMINILPD4-EVK > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@leica-geosystems.com> > > [m.felsch@pengutronix.de: Adapt the commit message] > > [m.felsch@pengutronix.de: Adapt the yaml comment] > > I don't see any differences. The comment is exactly the same as before. I fogot to say that I used V8 as base which caused problems on Shawns side and there was a difference. > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the > tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the > version they apply. > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. As said above.. Regards, Marco > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > >
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml index 442ce8f4d675..446f71b7b798 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml @@ -887,6 +887,7 @@ properties: - emtrion,emcon-mx8mm-avari # emCON-MX8MM SoM on Avari Base - fsl,imx8mm-ddr4-evk # i.MX8MM DDR4 EVK Board - fsl,imx8mm-evk # i.MX8MM EVK Board + - fsl,imx8mm-evkb # i.MX8MM EVKB Board - gateworks,imx8mm-gw7904 - gw,imx8mm-gw71xx-0x # i.MX8MM Gateworks Development Kit - gw,imx8mm-gw72xx-0x # i.MX8MM Gateworks Development Kit