| Message ID | 20230407-pm7250b-sid-v1-2-fc648478cc25@fairphone.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Make SID for PM7250B configurable (and a small fixup) | expand |
On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > possible. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > + #define PM7250B_SID 2 Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > > Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > > on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > > possible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > > > +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > > +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > > + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > > Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ Ok I'll wait for that to conclude then. Let's only consider patch 1/2 from this series then for now. Regards Luca > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > > Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > > on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > > possible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > > > +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > > +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > > + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > > Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a configuration. Regards Luca > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses >>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this >>> possible. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ >>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> >>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> >>> >>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ >>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID >>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 >> >> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring >> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > > What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > configuration. We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or macros depending on order of inclusion. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > >>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > >>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > >>> possible. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > >>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > >>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > >>> > >>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > >>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > >>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > >> > >> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > >> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > > > > What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > > to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > > will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > > configuration. > > We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > macros depending on order of inclusion. I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go.
On Wed May 10, 2023 at 10:07 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > > >>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > > >>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > > >>> possible. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > >>> --- > > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > > >>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > >>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > >>> > > >>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > > >>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > > >>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > > >> > > >> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > > >> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > > >> > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > > > > > > What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > > > to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > > > will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > > > configuration. > > > > We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > > macros depending on order of inclusion. > > I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I > agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go. What about the macro already used in-tree and proposed with this patch? I wouldn't say this is a "complex macro" since it's just a single number being replaced in a few places. Could we get this in now, and if we find a new & better way in the future we can adjust all the dtsi upstream?
On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 11:34, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> wrote: > > On Wed May 10, 2023 at 10:07 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > > > > > On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > >>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > > > >>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > > > >>> possible. > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > > >>> --- > > > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > > >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > >>> > > > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > > >>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > > > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > > >>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > > > >>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > > >>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > > >>> > > > >>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > > > >>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > > > >>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > > > >> > > > >> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > > > >> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > > > >> > > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > > > > > > > > What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > > > > to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > > > > will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > > > > configuration. > > > > > > We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > > > macros depending on order of inclusion. > > > > I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I > > agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go. > > What about the macro already used in-tree and proposed with this patch? > I wouldn't say this is a "complex macro" since it's just a single number > being replaced in a few places. My 2c: in my opinion it is fine (and it follows parameterization that we already have for some PMICs). > Could we get this in now, and if we find a new & better way in the > future we can adjust all the dtsi upstream? And this depends on the decision of RobH and Krzysztof.
On 10/05/2023 10:34, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Wed May 10, 2023 at 10:07 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: >>>> Hi Krzysztof, >>>> >>>> On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: >>>>>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses >>>>>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this >>>>>> possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>>>>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> >>>>>> >>>>>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ >>>>>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID >>>>>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 >>>>> >>>>> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring >>>>> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ >>>> >>>> What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough >>>> to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC >>>> will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a >>>> configuration. >>> >>> We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or >>> macros depending on order of inclusion. >> >> I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I >> agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go. > > What about the macro already used in-tree and proposed with this patch? > I wouldn't say this is a "complex macro" since it's just a single number > being replaced in a few places. Are you talking about the macro to which I responded: "or macros depending on order of inclusion." or something else? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed May 10, 2023 at 12:05 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/05/2023 10:34, Luca Weiss wrote: > > On Wed May 10, 2023 at 10:07 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > >>>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>>> > >>>> On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > >>>>>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > >>>>>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > >>>>>> possible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>>>>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > >>>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > >>>>>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > >>>>>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > >>>>> > >>>>> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > >>>>> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > >>>> > >>>> What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > >>>> to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > >>>> will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > >>>> configuration. > >>> > >>> We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > >>> macros depending on order of inclusion. > >> > >> I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I > >> agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go. > > > > What about the macro already used in-tree and proposed with this patch? > > I wouldn't say this is a "complex macro" since it's just a single number > > being replaced in a few places. > > Are you talking about the macro to which I responded: "or macros > depending on order of inclusion." or something else? I thought you mean with .. > >>> We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > >>> macros depending on order of inclusion. .. the macros proprosed in the patch you linked (that version that also adjusts the labels based on the SID). I was asking if the patch I sent (with #define PM7250B_SID) would be okay to take in at least until the bigger discussion has come to a conclusion, since we already have upstream occurances of such a macro so it's not a new concept. Otherwise I'll just carry this patch in my local tree until this situation has cleared up. Regards Luca > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, On Wed May 10, 2023 at 1:27 PM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Wed May 10, 2023 at 12:05 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 10/05/2023 10:34, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > On Wed May 10, 2023 at 10:07 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > >> On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > > >>>> Hi Krzysztof, > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>>>> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: > > >>>>>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses > > >>>>>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this > > >>>>>> possible. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > >>>>>> --- > > >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>>>>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 > > >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi > > >>>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ > > >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ > > >>>>>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID > > >>>>>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring > > >>>>> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/ > > >>>> > > >>>> What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > > >>>> to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > > >>>> will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > > >>>> configuration. > > >>> > > >>> We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > > >>> macros depending on order of inclusion. > > >> > > >> I still think we should find a way to parametrise PMIC dtsi, however I > > >> agree with Krzysztof that complex CPP is not a way to go. > > > > > > What about the macro already used in-tree and proposed with this patch? > > > I wouldn't say this is a "complex macro" since it's just a single number > > > being replaced in a few places. > > > > Are you talking about the macro to which I responded: "or macros > > depending on order of inclusion." or something else? > > I thought you mean with .. > > > >>> We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or > > >>> macros depending on order of inclusion. > > .. the macros proprosed in the patch you linked (that version that also > adjusts the labels based on the SID). > > I was asking if the patch I sent (with #define PM7250B_SID) would be > okay to take in at least until the bigger discussion has come to a > conclusion, since we already have upstream occurances of such a macro so > it's not a new concept. > > Otherwise I'll just carry this patch in my local tree until this > situation has cleared up. Has any decision been made in the meantime whether we can get this patch in (at least until we have a better solution)? Imo since this patch isn't introducing any new concept that isn't already present upstream so shouldn't be a big problem.. Regards Luca > > Regards > Luca > > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ +#ifndef PM7250B_SID + #define PM7250B_SID 2 +#endif + +#ifndef PM7250B_SID1 + #define PM7250B_SID1 3 +#endif + / { thermal-zones { pm7250b-thermal { @@ -39,16 +48,16 @@ trip2 { }; &spmi_bus { - pmic@2 { + pmic@PM7250B_SID { compatible = "qcom,pm7250b", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; - reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>; + reg = <PM7250B_SID SPMI_USID>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; pm7250b_temp: temp-alarm@2400 { compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm"; reg = <0x2400>; - interrupts = <0x2 0x24 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>; + interrupts = <PM7250B_SID 0x24 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>; io-channels = <&pm7250b_adc ADC5_DIE_TEMP>; io-channel-names = "thermal"; #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>; @@ -60,7 +69,7 @@ pm7250b_adc: adc@3100 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; #io-channel-cells = <1>; - interrupts = <0x2 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + interrupts = <PM7250B_SID 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; adc-chan@0 { reg = <ADC5_REF_GND>; @@ -141,7 +150,7 @@ adc-chan@99 { pm7250b_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5"; reg = <0x3500>; - interrupts = <0x2 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + interrupts = <PM7250B_SID 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; @@ -149,9 +158,9 @@ pm7250b_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { }; }; - pmic@3 { + pmic@PM7250B_SID1 { compatible = "qcom,pm7250b", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; - reg = <0x3 SPMI_USID>; + reg = <PM7250B_SID1 SPMI_USID>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; };
Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this possible. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)