Message ID | 168415745478.9504.1882537002036193828.stgit@manet.1015granger.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Socket creation observability | expand |
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 09:32 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > This series updates observability around socket creation and > destruction to help troubleshoot issues such as: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/65AFD2EF-E5D3-4461-B23A-D294486D5F65@oracle.com/T/#t > > I plan to apply these to nfsd-next. > > --- > > Chuck Lever (4): > SUNRPC: Fix an incorrect comment > SUNRPC: Remove dprintk() in svc_handle_xprt() > SUNRPC: Improve observability in svc_tcp_accept() > SUNRPC: Trace struct svc_sock lifetime events > > > include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 3 --- > net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 15 ++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > -- > Chuck Lever > These all look fine to me. I had one nit about a conditional tracepoint, but your call on whether you want to respin it that way. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> On May 15, 2023, at 12:56 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 09:32 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> This series updates observability around socket creation and >> destruction to help troubleshoot issues such as: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/65AFD2EF-E5D3-4461-B23A-D294486D5F65@oracle.com/T/#t >> >> I plan to apply these to nfsd-next. >> >> --- >> >> Chuck Lever (4): >> SUNRPC: Fix an incorrect comment >> SUNRPC: Remove dprintk() in svc_handle_xprt() >> SUNRPC: Improve observability in svc_tcp_accept() >> SUNRPC: Trace struct svc_sock lifetime events >> >> >> include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 3 --- >> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 15 ++++++-------- >> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> Chuck Lever >> > > These all look fine to me. I had one nit about a conditional tracepoint, > but your call on whether you want to respin it that way. Great minds, and all that... I had considered it, but decided it wasn't worth bothering. I appreciate your time and comments! > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> -- Chuck Lever