[RFC] selinux: TESTING ONLY, PLEASE IGNORE

Commit Message

Paul Moore May 16, 2023, 10:12 p.m. UTC

This patch can be safely ignored, I'm testing some new automated
tooling and needed to do an on-list test.  My apologies for the
noise.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[e-mail]>
---
 security/selinux/netlabel.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Paul Moore May 16, 2023, 10:30 p.m. UTC | #1

On May 16, 2023 Paul Moore <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> This patch can be safely ignored, I'm testing some new automated
> tooling and needed to do an on-list test.  My apologies for the
> noise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[e-mail]>
> ---
>  security/selinux/netlabel.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

This is also a test, you can ignore this one too.

--
paul-moore.com

Patch

diff --git a/security/selinux/netlabel.c b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
index 767c670d33ea..575e7597c3aa 100644
--- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@  static struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *selinux_netlbl_sock_genattr(struct sock *sk)
  *
  */
 static struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *selinux_netlbl_sock_getattr(
-							const struct sock *sk,
-							u32 sid)
+	const struct sock *sk,
+	u32 sid)
 {
 	struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
 	struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *secattr = sksec->nlbl_secattr;
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@  int selinux_netlbl_skbuff_setsid(struct sk_buff *skb,
  *
  */
 int selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_association *asoc,
-				     struct sk_buff *skb)
+				      struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	int rc;
 	struct netlbl_lsm_secattr secattr;
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@  int selinux_netlbl_sock_rcv_skb(struct sk_security_struct *sksec,
 static inline int selinux_netlbl_option(int level, int optname)
 {
 	return (level == IPPROTO_IP && optname == IP_OPTIONS) ||
-		(level == IPPROTO_IPV6 && optname == IPV6_HOPOPTS);
+	       (level == IPPROTO_IPV6 && optname == IPV6_HOPOPTS);
 }
 
 /**