| Message ID | 20230516193549.544673-11-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | x86: address -Wmissing-prototype warnings | expand |
On 5/16/23 12:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c:1233:34: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_start_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > arch/x86/xen/irq.c:22:14: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_force_evtchn_callback' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c:358:20: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_pte_val' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c:366:20: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_pgd_val' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] What's the deal with this one? The patch is doing a bunch functions on top of the ones from the commit message. Were you just showing a snippet of what the actual set of warnings is? Also, fwiw, it would be nice to have actual words in the changelog, even for these maddeningly repetitive series. Even something like: Xen has a bunch of these because of how the paravirt code uses inline assembly.
On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 19:28, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 5/16/23 12:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c:1233:34: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_start_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] >> arch/x86/xen/irq.c:22:14: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_force_evtchn_callback' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] >> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c:358:20: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_pte_val' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] >> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c:366:20: error: no previous prototype for 'xen_pgd_val' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > > What's the deal with this one? > > The patch is doing a bunch functions on top of the ones from the commit > message. Were you just showing a snippet of what the actual set of > warnings is? I missed this one going through the changelogs before sending them out, I thought I had added a proper text to each one, but it fell through the cracks. I've followed up with a v2 patch that has a proper changelog now. Arnd
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/efi.c b/arch/x86/xen/efi.c index 7d7ffb9c826a..863d0d6b3edc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/efi.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/efi.c @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ #include <asm/setup.h> #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> +#include "xen-ops.h" + static efi_char16_t vendor[100] __initdata; static efi_system_table_t efi_systab_xen __initdata = { diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.h b/arch/x86/xen/smp.h index 22fb982ff971..cbc45e2462f5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.h +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.h @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ #ifndef _XEN_SMP_H #ifdef CONFIG_SMP + +asmlinkage void cpu_bringup_and_idle(void); + extern void xen_send_IPI_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector); extern void xen_send_IPI_mask_allbutself(const struct cpumask *mask, diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h index 6d7f6318fc07..0f71ee3fe86b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h @@ -160,4 +160,18 @@ void xen_hvm_post_suspend(int suspend_cancelled); static inline void xen_hvm_post_suspend(int suspend_cancelled) {} #endif +void xen_force_evtchn_callback(void); +pteval_t xen_pte_val(pte_t pte); +pgdval_t xen_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd); +pte_t xen_make_pte(pteval_t pte); +pgd_t xen_make_pgd(pgdval_t pgd); +pmdval_t xen_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd); +pmd_t xen_make_pmd(pmdval_t pmd); +pudval_t xen_pud_val(pud_t pud); +pud_t xen_make_pud(pudval_t pud); +p4dval_t xen_p4d_val(p4d_t p4d); +p4d_t xen_make_p4d(p4dval_t p4d); +pte_t xen_make_pte_init(pteval_t pte); +void xen_start_kernel(struct start_info *si); + #endif /* XEN_OPS_H */ diff --git a/include/xen/xen.h b/include/xen/xen.h index 0efeb652f9b8..f989162983c3 100644 --- a/include/xen/xen.h +++ b/include/xen/xen.h @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ extern uint32_t xen_start_flags; #include <xen/interface/hvm/start_info.h> extern struct hvm_start_info pvh_start_info; +void xen_prepare_pvh(void); +struct pt_regs; +void xen_pv_evtchn_do_upcall(struct pt_regs *regs); #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 #include <xen/interface/xen.h>