Message ID | 20230428081457.857009-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Expose RPS thresholds in sysfs | expand |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:14:56AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > > In preparation for exposing via sysfs add helpers for managing rps > thresholds. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > index a39eee444849..a5a7315f5ace 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > @@ -2573,6 +2573,42 @@ int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val) > return set_min_freq(rps, val); > } > > +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) > +{ > + return rps->power.up_threshold; > +} > + > +static int rps_set_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 *threshold, u8 val) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (val > 100) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rps->lock); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + *threshold = val; > + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) > +{ > + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.up_threshold, threshold); > +} > + > +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) > +{ > + return rps->power.down_threshold; > +} > + > +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) > +{ > + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.down_threshold, threshold); > +} > + Isn't this breaking compilation with the unused functions? > static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) > { > struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h > index a3fa987aa91f..92fb01f5a452 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h > @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive); > > int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); > int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); > +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); > +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); > +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); > +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); > u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); > u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency_fw(struct intel_rps *rps); > u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); > -- > 2.37.2 >
On 19/05/2023 21:56, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:14:56AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >> >> In preparation for exposing via sysfs add helpers for managing rps >> thresholds. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c >> index a39eee444849..a5a7315f5ace 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c >> @@ -2573,6 +2573,42 @@ int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val) >> return set_min_freq(rps, val); >> } >> >> +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) >> +{ >> + return rps->power.up_threshold; >> +} >> + >> +static int rps_set_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 *threshold, u8 val) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (val > 100) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rps->lock); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + *threshold = val; >> + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) >> +{ >> + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.up_threshold, threshold); >> +} >> + >> +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) >> +{ >> + return rps->power.down_threshold; >> +} >> + >> +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) >> +{ >> + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.down_threshold, threshold); >> +} >> + > > Isn't this breaking compilation with the unused functions? I checked and no - guess because they are exported. Would you prefer me to squash 3&4 so that there isn't a patch which adds unused helpers? Regards, Tvrtko > >> static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) >> { >> struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h >> index a3fa987aa91f..92fb01f5a452 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h >> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive); >> >> int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); >> int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); >> +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); >> +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); >> +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); >> +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); >> u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); >> u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency_fw(struct intel_rps *rps); >> u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); >> -- >> 2.37.2 >>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index a39eee444849..a5a7315f5ace 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -2573,6 +2573,42 @@ int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val) return set_min_freq(rps, val); } +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + return rps->power.up_threshold; +} + +static int rps_set_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 *threshold, u8 val) +{ + int ret; + + if (val > 100) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rps->lock); + if (ret) + return ret; + *threshold = val; + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); + + return 0; +} + +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) +{ + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.up_threshold, threshold); +} + +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + return rps->power.down_threshold; +} + +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold) +{ + return rps_set_threshold(rps, &rps->power.down_threshold, threshold); +} + static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) { struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index a3fa987aa91f..92fb01f5a452 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive); int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); +u8 intel_rps_get_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); +int intel_rps_set_up_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); +u8 intel_rps_get_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps); +int intel_rps_set_down_threshold(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 threshold); u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency_fw(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);