mbox series

[5.4,0/2] Backport few dfs related fixes to cifs

Message ID 20230607185313.11363-1-risbhat@amazon.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Backport few dfs related fixes to cifs | expand

Message

Rishabh Bhatnagar June 7, 2023, 6:53 p.m. UTC 
Recently we have been seeing kernel panic in cifs_reconnect function
while accessing tgt_list. Looks like tgt_list is not initialized
correctly. There are fixes already present in 5.10 and later trees.
Backporting them to 5.4

 CIFS VFS: \\172.30.1.14 cifs_reconnect: no target servers for DFS
 failover
 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
 PGD 260e067 P4D 260e067 PUD 2610067 PMD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
 RIP: 0010:cifs_reconnect+0x51d/0xef0 [cifs]
 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000693da0 EFLAGS: 00010282
 RAX: fffffffffffffff8 RBX: ffff8887fa63b800 RCX: fffffffffffffff8
 Call Trace:
 cifs_handle_standard+0x18d/0x1b0 [cifs]
 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0xa5c/0xc90 [cifs]
 kthread+0x113/0x130

*** BLURB HERE ***

Paulo Alcantara (2):
  cifs: get rid of unused parameter in reconn_setup_dfs_targets()
  cifs: handle empty list of targets in cifs_reconnect()

 fs/cifs/connect.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Greg Kroah-Hartman June 7, 2023, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:53:11PM +0000, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> Recently we have been seeing kernel panic in cifs_reconnect function
> while accessing tgt_list. Looks like tgt_list is not initialized
> correctly. There are fixes already present in 5.10 and later trees.
> Backporting them to 5.4
> 
>  CIFS VFS: \\172.30.1.14 cifs_reconnect: no target servers for DFS
>  failover
>  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
>  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>  PGD 260e067 P4D 260e067 PUD 2610067 PMD 0
>  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>  RIP: 0010:cifs_reconnect+0x51d/0xef0 [cifs]
>  RSP: 0018:ffffc90000693da0 EFLAGS: 00010282
>  RAX: fffffffffffffff8 RBX: ffff8887fa63b800 RCX: fffffffffffffff8
>  Call Trace:
>  cifs_handle_standard+0x18d/0x1b0 [cifs]
>  cifs_demultiplex_thread+0xa5c/0xc90 [cifs]
>  kthread+0x113/0x130
> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***

No blurb?

And this says 5.4, yet your patches say 5.10?

Totally confused...

greg k-h
Rishabh Bhatnagar June 7, 2023, 8:20 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 6/7/23 12:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:53:11PM +0000, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
>> Recently we have been seeing kernel panic in cifs_reconnect function
>> while accessing tgt_list. Looks like tgt_list is not initialized
>> correctly. There are fixes already present in 5.10 and later trees.
>> Backporting them to 5.4
>>
>>   CIFS VFS: \\172.30.1.14 cifs_reconnect: no target servers for DFS
>>   failover
>>   BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
>>   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>>   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>>   PGD 260e067 P4D 260e067 PUD 2610067 PMD 0
>>   Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>>   RIP: 0010:cifs_reconnect+0x51d/0xef0 [cifs]
>>   RSP: 0018:ffffc90000693da0 EFLAGS: 00010282
>>   RAX: fffffffffffffff8 RBX: ffff8887fa63b800 RCX: fffffffffffffff8
>>   Call Trace:
>>   cifs_handle_standard+0x18d/0x1b0 [cifs]
>>   cifs_demultiplex_thread+0xa5c/0xc90 [cifs]
>>   kthread+0x113/0x130
>>
>> *** BLURB HERE ***
> No blurb?
>
> And this says 5.4, yet your patches say 5.10?
>
> Totally confused...
>
> greg k-h

These patches are applicable for 5.4. Will send another version with 
that fixed.
Apologies for the mess.
Greg Kroah-Hartman June 7, 2023, 8:36 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 01:20:23PM -0700, Bhatnagar, Rishabh wrote:
> 
> On 6/7/23 12:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:53:11PM +0000, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> > > Recently we have been seeing kernel panic in cifs_reconnect function
> > > while accessing tgt_list. Looks like tgt_list is not initialized
> > > correctly. There are fixes already present in 5.10 and later trees.
> > > Backporting them to 5.4
> > > 
> > >   CIFS VFS: \\172.30.1.14 cifs_reconnect: no target servers for DFS
> > >   failover
> > >   BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
> > >   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > >   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > >   PGD 260e067 P4D 260e067 PUD 2610067 PMD 0
> > >   Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> > >   RIP: 0010:cifs_reconnect+0x51d/0xef0 [cifs]
> > >   RSP: 0018:ffffc90000693da0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > >   RAX: fffffffffffffff8 RBX: ffff8887fa63b800 RCX: fffffffffffffff8
> > >   Call Trace:
> > >   cifs_handle_standard+0x18d/0x1b0 [cifs]
> > >   cifs_demultiplex_thread+0xa5c/0xc90 [cifs]
> > >   kthread+0x113/0x130
> > > 
> > > *** BLURB HERE ***
> > No blurb?
> > 
> > And this says 5.4, yet your patches say 5.10?
> > 
> > Totally confused...
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> These patches are applicable for 5.4. Will send another version with that
> fixed.
> Apologies for the mess.

Please resend both series, as this one I already dropped from my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h