diff mbox series

selftests/ptp: Fix timestamp printf format for PTP_SYS_OFFSET

Message ID 20230615083404.57112-1-alex.maftei@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 76a4c8b82938bc5020b67663db41f451684bf327
Headers show
Series selftests/ptp: Fix timestamp printf format for PTP_SYS_OFFSET | expand

Commit Message

Alex Maftei June 15, 2023, 8:34 a.m. UTC
Previously, timestamps were printed using "%lld.%u" which is incorrect
for nanosecond values lower than 100,000,000 as they're fractional
digits, therefore leading zeros are meaningful.

This patch changes the format strings to "%lld.%09u" in order to add
leading zeros to the nanosecond value.

Fixes: 568ebc5985f5 ("ptp: add the PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl to the testptp program")
Fixes: 4ec54f95736f ("ptp: Fix compiler warnings in the testptp utility")
Fixes: 6ab0e475f1f3 ("Documentation: fix misc. warnings")
Signed-off-by: Alex Maftei <alex.maftei@amd.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Pavan Chebbi June 15, 2023, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 2:05 PM Alex Maftei <alex.maftei@amd.com> wrote:
>
> Previously, timestamps were printed using "%lld.%u" which is incorrect
> for nanosecond values lower than 100,000,000 as they're fractional
> digits, therefore leading zeros are meaningful.
>
> This patch changes the format strings to "%lld.%09u" in order to add
> leading zeros to the nanosecond value.
>
> Fixes: 568ebc5985f5 ("ptp: add the PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl to the testptp program")
> Fixes: 4ec54f95736f ("ptp: Fix compiler warnings in the testptp utility")
> Fixes: 6ab0e475f1f3 ("Documentation: fix misc. warnings")
> Signed-off-by: Alex Maftei <alex.maftei@amd.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Change looks good but can you mark this for "net" correctly and get
CI/sanity checks done.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
> index 198ad5f32187..cfa9562f3cd8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
> @@ -502,11 +502,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>                         interval = t2 - t1;
>                         offset = (t2 + t1) / 2 - tp;
>
> -                       printf("system time: %lld.%u\n",
> +                       printf("system time: %lld.%09u\n",
>                                 (pct+2*i)->sec, (pct+2*i)->nsec);
> -                       printf("phc    time: %lld.%u\n",
> +                       printf("phc    time: %lld.%09u\n",
>                                 (pct+2*i+1)->sec, (pct+2*i+1)->nsec);
> -                       printf("system time: %lld.%u\n",
> +                       printf("system time: %lld.%09u\n",
>                                 (pct+2*i+2)->sec, (pct+2*i+2)->nsec);
>                         printf("system/phc clock time offset is %" PRId64 " ns\n"
>                                "system     clock time delay  is %" PRId64 " ns\n",
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>
Richard Cochran June 15, 2023, 7:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 09:34:04AM +0100, Alex Maftei wrote:
> Previously, timestamps were printed using "%lld.%u" which is incorrect
> for nanosecond values lower than 100,000,000 as they're fractional
> digits, therefore leading zeros are meaningful.
> 
> This patch changes the format strings to "%lld.%09u" in order to add
> leading zeros to the nanosecond value.
> 
> Fixes: 568ebc5985f5 ("ptp: add the PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl to the testptp program")
> Fixes: 4ec54f95736f ("ptp: Fix compiler warnings in the testptp utility")
> Fixes: 6ab0e475f1f3 ("Documentation: fix misc. warnings")
> Signed-off-by: Alex Maftei <alex.maftei@amd.com>

Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Jakub Kicinski June 15, 2023, 7:50 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:13:27 +0530 Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> Change looks good but can you mark this for "net" correctly and get
> CI/sanity checks done.

It may be failing path selection, bot needs some changes in what it
considers "networking", tools/testing/selftests/ptp is not on the list.

If you have a few cycles feel free to extend this list:
https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/blob/master/netdev/tree_match.py#L47
post a PR on GH, I'll merge it in.

The patch is just a test fix, not worth reposting, IMHO.
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org June 15, 2023, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #4
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:34:04 +0100 you wrote:
> Previously, timestamps were printed using "%lld.%u" which is incorrect
> for nanosecond values lower than 100,000,000 as they're fractional
> digits, therefore leading zeros are meaningful.
> 
> This patch changes the format strings to "%lld.%09u" in order to add
> leading zeros to the nanosecond value.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - selftests/ptp: Fix timestamp printf format for PTP_SYS_OFFSET
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/76a4c8b82938

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
index 198ad5f32187..cfa9562f3cd8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.c
@@ -502,11 +502,11 @@  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 			interval = t2 - t1;
 			offset = (t2 + t1) / 2 - tp;
 
-			printf("system time: %lld.%u\n",
+			printf("system time: %lld.%09u\n",
 				(pct+2*i)->sec, (pct+2*i)->nsec);
-			printf("phc    time: %lld.%u\n",
+			printf("phc    time: %lld.%09u\n",
 				(pct+2*i+1)->sec, (pct+2*i+1)->nsec);
-			printf("system time: %lld.%u\n",
+			printf("system time: %lld.%09u\n",
 				(pct+2*i+2)->sec, (pct+2*i+2)->nsec);
 			printf("system/phc clock time offset is %" PRId64 " ns\n"
 			       "system     clock time delay  is %" PRId64 " ns\n",