diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,5/5] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for bpf memory allocator

Message ID 20230613080921.1623219-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Add benchmark for bpf memory allocator | expand

Commit Message

Hou Tao June 13, 2023, 8:09 a.m. UTC
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

The benchmark could be used to compare the performance of hash map
operations and the memory usage between different flavors of bpf memory
allocator (e.g., no bpf ma vs bpf ma vs reuse-after-gp bpf ma). It also
could be used to check the performance improvement or the memory saving
provided by optimization.

The benchmark creates a non-preallocated hash map which uses bpf memory
allocator and shows the operation performance and the memory usage of
the hash map under different use cases:
(1) overwrite
Each CPU overwrites nonoverlapping part of hash map. When each CPU
completes overwriting of 64 elements in hash map, it increases the
op_count.
(2) batch_add_batch_del
Each CPU adds then deletes nonoverlapping part of hash map in batch.
When each CPU adds and deletes 64 elements in hash map, it increases
the op_count twice.
(3) add_del_on_diff_cpu
Each two-CPUs pair adds and deletes nonoverlapping part of map
cooperatively. When each CPU adds or deletes 64 elements in hash map,
it will increase the op_count.

The following is the benchmark results when comparing between different
flavors of bpf memory allocator. These tests are conducted on a KVM guest
with 8 CPUs and 16 GB memory. The command line below is used to do all
the following benchmarks:

  ./bench htab-mem --use-case $name ${OPTS} -w3 -d10 -a -p8

These results show that preallocated hash map has both better performance
and smaller memory usage.

(1) non-preallocated + no bpf memory allocator (v6.0.19)
use kmalloc() + call_rcu

overwrite            per-prod-op :  8.54 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem: 48.11 ± 14.83MiB, peak mem: 91.84MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op : 12.99 ± 0.12k/s, avg mem: 32.88 ± 5.42MiB, peak mem: 67.50MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op :  9.19 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem:  3.19 ± 0.40MiB, peak mem:  5.11MiB

(2) preallocated
OPTS=--preallocated

overwrite            per-prod-op : 93.56 ± 0.03k/s, avg mem: 1.23 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.24MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op : 139.67 ± 0.08k/s, avg mem: 1.23 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op : 15.51 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem: 1.77 ± 0.12MiB, peak mem: 1.95MiB

(3) normal bpf memory allocator

overwrite            per-prod-op : 89.45 ± 0.27k/s, avg mem: 2.26 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op : 59.17 ± 0.11k/s, avg mem: 2.34 ± 0.14MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op : 15.60 ± 0.20k/s, avg mem: 14.75 ± 2.77MiB, peak mem: 23.05MiB

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   3 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           |   4 +
 .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c     | 303 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/benchs/run_bench_htab_mem.sh          |  40 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/htab_mem_bench.c      | 107 +++++++
 5 files changed, 457 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_htab_mem.sh
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_mem_bench.c

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov June 19, 2023, 8:35 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:09:21PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> +
> +static void htab_mem_notify_wait_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)

notify_wait and wait_notify names are confusing.
The first one is doing map_update and 2nd is map_delete, right?
Just call them such?

> +{
> +	while (true) {
> +		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
> +		/* Notify for start */

the comment is confusing too.
Maybe /* Notify map_deleter that map_updates are done */ ?

> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
> +		/* Wait for completion */

and /* Wait for deletions to complete */ ?

> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void htab_mem_wait_notify_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)
> +{
> +	while (true) {
> +		/* Wait for start */
> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
> +		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
> +		/* Notify for completion */

similar.

> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
> +	}
> +}


> +static int write_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
> +		return 1;

It can never be hit, right?
Remove it then?

> +
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(&htab, &ctx->from, zeroed_value, flags);

please add error check.
I think update/delete notification is correct, but it could be silently broken.
update(BPF_NOEXIST) could be returning error in one thread and
map_delete_elem could be failing too...

> +	ctx->from += ctx->step;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int overwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	return write_htab(i, ctx, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int newwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	return write_htab(i, ctx, BPF_NOEXIST);
> +}
> +
> +static int del_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
> +		return 1;

delete?

> +
> +	bpf_map_delete_elem(&htab, &ctx->from);

and here.

> +	ctx->from += ctx->step;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
> +int overwrite(void *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct update_ctx update;
> +
> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> +	update.step = nr_thread;
> +	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
> +int batch_add_batch_del(void *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct update_ctx update;
> +
> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> +	update.step = nr_thread;
> +	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
> +
> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> +	bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);
> +
> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 2);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
> +int add_del_on_diff_cpu(void *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct update_ctx update;
> +	unsigned int from;
> +
> +	from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> +	update.from = from / 2;

why extra 'from' variable? Just combine above two lines.

> +	update.step = nr_thread / 2;
> +
> +	if (from & 1)
> +		bpf_loop(64, newwrite_htab, &update, 0);
> +	else
> +		bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);

I think it's cleaner to split this into two bpf programs.
Do update(NOEXIST) in one triggered by sys_enter_getpgid
and do delete_elem() in another triggered by a different syscall.

> +
> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.29.2
>
Hou Tao June 20, 2023, 1:42 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Alexei,

On 6/20/2023 4:35 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:09:21PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
>> +
>> +static void htab_mem_notify_wait_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)
> notify_wait and wait_notify names are confusing.
> The first one is doing map_update and 2nd is map_delete, right?
> Just call them such?
OK.
>
>> +{
>> +	while (true) {
>> +		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
>> +		/* Notify for start */
> the comment is confusing too.
> Maybe /* Notify map_deleter that map_updates are done */ ?
Will update.
>
>> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
>> +		/* Wait for completion */
> and /* Wait for deletions to complete */ ?
Yes. Will update.
>
>> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void htab_mem_wait_notify_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)
>> +{
>> +	while (true) {
>> +		/* Wait for start */
>> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
>> +		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
>> +		/* Notify for completion */
> similar.
Will update.
>
>> +		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
>> +	}
>> +}
>
>> +static int write_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> +	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
>> +		return 1;
> It can never be hit, right?
> Remove it then?
MAX_ENTRIES / 64 = 128, so when then number of producers is greater than
128, it will be hit. But I think we can remove it and adjust max_entries
accordingly when the number of producers is greater than 128.
>
>> +
>> +	bpf_map_update_elem(&htab, &ctx->from, zeroed_value, flags);
> please add error check.
> I think update/delete notification is correct, but it could be silently broken.
> update(BPF_NOEXIST) could be returning error in one thread and
> map_delete_elem could be failing too...
If these threads update or delete the non-overlapped part of the hash
map, then there will be no fail. But when the number of producer is
greater than the number of online CPU, there will be failure, but this
use case is not expected benchmark use case.

>
>> +	ctx->from += ctx->step;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int overwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	return write_htab(i, ctx, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int newwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	return write_htab(i, ctx, BPF_NOEXIST);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int del_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
>> +		return 1;
> delete?
Will fix.
>
>> +
>> +	bpf_map_delete_elem(&htab, &ctx->from);
> and here.
>
>> +	ctx->from += ctx->step;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
>> +int overwrite(void *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct update_ctx update;
>> +
>> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
>> +	update.step = nr_thread;
>> +	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
>> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
>> +int batch_add_batch_del(void *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct update_ctx update;
>> +
>> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
>> +	update.step = nr_thread;
>> +	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
>> +
>> +	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
>> +	bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);
>> +
>> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 2);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
>> +int add_del_on_diff_cpu(void *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct update_ctx update;
>> +	unsigned int from;
>> +
>> +	from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
>> +	update.from = from / 2;
> why extra 'from' variable? Just combine above two lines.
from is also used below to decide the bpf program should do update or
deletion.
>
>> +	update.step = nr_thread / 2;
>> +
>> +	if (from & 1)
>> +		bpf_loop(64, newwrite_htab, &update, 0);
>> +	else
>> +		bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);
> I think it's cleaner to split this into two bpf programs.
> Do update(NOEXIST) in one triggered by sys_enter_getpgid
> and do delete_elem() in another triggered by a different syscall.
OK. Will do that in next version.
>
>> +
>> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> -- 
>> 2.29.2
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 538df8fb8c42..add018823ebd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -644,11 +644,13 @@  $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o: $(OUTPUT)/local_storage_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.o: $(OUTPUT)/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_create.o: $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_create.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_hashmap_lookup.o: $(OUTPUT)/bpf_hashmap_lookup.skel.h
+$(OUTPUT)/bench_htab_mem.o: $(OUTPUT)/htab_mem_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench.o: bench.h testing_helpers.h $(BPFOBJ)
 $(OUTPUT)/bench: LDLIBS += -lm
 $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
 		 $(TESTING_HELPERS) \
 		 $(TRACE_HELPERS) \
+		 $(CGROUP_HELPERS) \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_count.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_rename.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_trigger.o \
@@ -661,6 +663,7 @@  $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_hashmap_lookup.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_create.o \
+		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_htab_mem.o \
 		 #
 	$(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
 	$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(filter %.a %.o,$^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index 41fe5a82b88b..73ce11b0547d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@  extern struct argp bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_strncmp_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_hashmap_lookup_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_local_storage_create_argp;
+extern struct argp bench_htab_mem_argp;
 
 static const struct argp_child bench_parsers[] = {
 	{ &bench_ringbufs_argp, 0, "Ring buffers benchmark", 0 },
@@ -290,6 +291,7 @@  static const struct argp_child bench_parsers[] = {
 		"local_storage RCU Tasks Trace slowdown benchmark", 0 },
 	{ &bench_hashmap_lookup_argp, 0, "Hashmap lookup benchmark", 0 },
 	{ &bench_local_storage_create_argp, 0, "local-storage-create benchmark", 0 },
+	{ &bench_htab_mem_argp, 0, "hash map memory benchmark", 0 },
 	{},
 };
 
@@ -520,6 +522,7 @@  extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control;
 extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_tasks_trace;
 extern const struct bench bench_bpf_hashmap_lookup;
 extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_create;
+extern const struct bench bench_htab_mem;
 
 static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_count_global,
@@ -561,6 +564,7 @@  static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_local_storage_tasks_trace,
 	&bench_bpf_hashmap_lookup,
 	&bench_local_storage_create,
+	&bench_htab_mem,
 };
 
 static void find_benchmark(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f0b57e66c1eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2023. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
+#include <argp.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+
+#include "bench.h"
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "htab_mem_bench.skel.h"
+
+static struct htab_mem_ctx {
+	struct htab_mem_bench *skel;
+	pthread_barrier_t *notify;
+	int fd;
+	bool do_notify_wait;
+} ctx;
+
+static struct htab_mem_args {
+	u32 value_size;
+	const char *use_case;
+	bool preallocated;
+} args = {
+	.value_size = 8,
+	.use_case = "overwrite",
+	.preallocated = false,
+};
+
+enum {
+	ARG_VALUE_SIZE = 10000,
+	ARG_USE_CASE = 10001,
+	ARG_PREALLOCATED = 10002,
+};
+
+static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
+	{ "value-size", ARG_VALUE_SIZE, "VALUE_SIZE", 0,
+	  "Set the value size of hash map (default 8)" },
+	{ "use-case", ARG_USE_CASE, "USE_CASE", 0,
+	  "Set the use case of hash map: overwrite|batch_add_batch_del|add_del_on_diff_cpu" },
+	{ "preallocated", ARG_PREALLOCATED, NULL, 0, "use preallocated hash map" },
+	{},
+};
+
+static error_t htab_mem_parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
+{
+	switch (key) {
+	case ARG_VALUE_SIZE:
+		args.value_size = strtoul(arg, NULL, 10);
+		if (args.value_size > 4096) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "too big value size %u\n", args.value_size);
+			argp_usage(state);
+		}
+		break;
+	case ARG_USE_CASE:
+		args.use_case = strdup(arg);
+		break;
+	case ARG_PREALLOCATED:
+		args.preallocated = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+const struct argp bench_htab_mem_argp = {
+	.options = opts,
+	.parser = htab_mem_parse_arg,
+};
+
+static void htab_mem_validate(void)
+{
+	if (!strcmp("add_del_on_diff_cpu", args.use_case) && env.producer_cnt % 2) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "%s needs an even number of producers\n", args.use_case);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+}
+
+static int htab_mem_bench_init_barriers(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i, nr = (env.producer_cnt + 1) / 2;
+	pthread_barrier_t *barriers;
+
+	barriers = calloc(nr, sizeof(*barriers));
+	if (!barriers)
+		return -1;
+
+	/* Used for synchronization between two threads */
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+		pthread_barrier_init(&barriers[i], NULL, 2);
+
+	ctx.notify = barriers;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_bench_exit_barriers(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i, nr;
+
+	if (!ctx.notify)
+		return;
+
+	nr = (env.producer_cnt + 1) / 2;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+		pthread_barrier_destroy(&ctx.notify[i]);
+	free(ctx.notify);
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_setup(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	int err;
+
+	setup_libbpf();
+
+	err = cgroup_setup_and_join("/htab_mem");
+	if (err < 0)
+		exit(1);
+	ctx.fd = err;
+
+	ctx.skel = htab_mem_bench__open();
+	if (!ctx.skel) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to open skeleton\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	err = htab_mem_bench_init_barriers();
+	if (err) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to init barrier\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	map = ctx.skel->maps.htab;
+	bpf_map__set_value_size(map, args.value_size);
+	if (args.preallocated)
+		bpf_map__set_map_flags(map, bpf_map__map_flags(map) & ~BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+
+	/* Do synchronization between addition thread and deletion thread */
+	if (!strcmp("add_del_on_diff_cpu", args.use_case))
+		ctx.do_notify_wait = true;
+
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(ctx.skel->obj, args.use_case);
+	if (!prog) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "no such use-case: %s\n", args.use_case);
+		fprintf(stderr, "available use case:");
+		bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, ctx.skel->obj)
+			fprintf(stderr, " %s", bpf_program__name(prog));
+		fprintf(stderr, "\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
+	ctx.skel->bss->nr_thread = env.producer_cnt;
+
+	err = htab_mem_bench__load(ctx.skel);
+	if (err) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to load skeleton\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+	err = htab_mem_bench__attach(ctx.skel);
+	if (err) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach skeleton\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+	return;
+cleanup:
+	close(ctx.fd);
+	cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+	htab_mem_bench_exit_barriers();
+	htab_mem_bench__destroy(ctx.skel);
+	exit(1);
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_notify_wait_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)
+{
+	while (true) {
+		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+		/* Notify for start */
+		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
+		/* Wait for completion */
+		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
+	}
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_wait_notify_producer(pthread_barrier_t *notify)
+{
+	while (true) {
+		/* Wait for start */
+		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
+		(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+		/* Notify for completion */
+		pthread_barrier_wait(notify);
+	}
+}
+
+static void *htab_mem_producer(void *arg)
+{
+	pthread_barrier_t *notify;
+	int seq;
+
+	if (!ctx.do_notify_wait) {
+		while (true)
+			(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	seq = (long)arg;
+	notify = &ctx.notify[seq / 2];
+	if (seq & 1)
+		htab_mem_notify_wait_producer(notify);
+	else
+		htab_mem_wait_notify_producer(notify);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_read_mem_cgrp_file(const char *name, unsigned long *value)
+{
+	char buf[32];
+	ssize_t got;
+	int fd;
+
+	fd = openat(ctx.fd, name, O_RDONLY);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		/* cgroup v1 ? */
+		fprintf(stderr, "no %s\n", name);
+		*value = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	got = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1);
+	if (got <= 0) {
+		*value = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+	buf[got] = 0;
+
+	*value = strtoull(buf, NULL, 0);
+
+	close(fd);
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_measure(struct bench_res *res)
+{
+	res->hits = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->op_cnt, 0) / env.producer_cnt;
+	htab_mem_read_mem_cgrp_file("memory.current", &res->gp_ct);
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
+{
+	double loop, mem;
+
+	loop = res->hits / 1000.0 / (delta_ns / 1000000000.0);
+	mem = res->gp_ct / 1048576.0;
+	printf("Iter %3d (%7.3lfus): ", iter, (delta_ns - 1000000000) / 1000.0);
+	printf("per-prod-op %7.2lfk/s, memory usage %7.2lfMiB\n", loop, mem);
+}
+
+static void htab_mem_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
+{
+	double mem_mean = 0.0, mem_stddev = 0.0;
+	double loop_mean = 0.0, loop_stddev = 0.0;
+	unsigned long peak_mem;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
+		loop_mean += res[i].hits / 1000.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
+		mem_mean += res[i].gp_ct / 1048576.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
+	}
+	if (res_cnt > 1)  {
+		for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
+			loop_stddev += (loop_mean - res[i].hits / 1000.0) *
+				       (loop_mean - res[i].hits / 1000.0) /
+				       (res_cnt - 1.0);
+			mem_stddev += (mem_mean - res[i].gp_ct / 1048576.0) *
+				      (mem_mean - res[i].gp_ct / 1048576.0) /
+				      (res_cnt - 1.0);
+		}
+		loop_stddev = sqrt(loop_stddev);
+		mem_stddev = sqrt(mem_stddev);
+	}
+
+	htab_mem_read_mem_cgrp_file("memory.peak", &peak_mem);
+	printf("Summary: per-prod-op %7.2lf \u00B1 %7.2lfk/s, memory usage %7.2lf \u00B1 %7.2lfMiB,"
+	       " peak memory usage %7.2lfMiB\n",
+	       loop_mean, loop_stddev, mem_mean, mem_stddev, peak_mem / 1048576.0);
+
+	cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+}
+
+const struct bench bench_htab_mem = {
+	.name = "htab-mem",
+	.argp = &bench_htab_mem_argp,
+	.validate = htab_mem_validate,
+	.setup = htab_mem_setup,
+	.producer_thread = htab_mem_producer,
+	.measure = htab_mem_measure,
+	.report_progress = htab_mem_report_progress,
+	.report_final = htab_mem_report_final,
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_htab_mem.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_htab_mem.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..516f46e57898
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_htab_mem.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ 
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+source ./benchs/run_common.sh
+
+set -eufo pipefail
+
+htab_mem()
+{
+	echo -n "per-prod-op : "
+	echo -n "$*" | sed -E "s/.* per-prod-op\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+k\/s).*/\1/"
+	echo -n -e ", avg mem: "
+	echo -n "$*" | sed -E "s/.* memory usage\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+MiB).*/\1/"
+	echo -n ", peak mem: "
+	echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.* peak memory usage\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+MiB).*/\1/"
+}
+
+summarize_htab_mem()
+{
+	local bench="$1"
+	local summary=$(echo $2 | tail -n1)
+
+	printf "%-20s %s\n" "$bench" "$(htab_mem $summary)"
+}
+
+htab_mem_bench()
+{
+	local name
+
+	for name in overwrite batch_add_batch_del add_del_on_diff_cpu
+	do
+		summarize_htab_mem "$name" "$($RUN_BENCH htab-mem --use-case $name -p8 "$@")"
+	done
+}
+
+header "preallocated"
+htab_mem_bench "--preallocated"
+
+header "normal bpf ma"
+htab_mem_bench
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_mem_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_mem_bench.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a9b3d90f90ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_mem_bench.c
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2023. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct update_ctx {
+	unsigned int from;
+	unsigned int step;
+};
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 8192
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	__uint(key_size, 4);
+	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+	__uint(max_entries, MAX_ENTRIES);
+} htab SEC(".maps");
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+unsigned char zeroed_value[4096];
+unsigned int nr_thread = 0;
+long op_cnt = 0;
+
+static int write_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
+		return 1;
+
+	bpf_map_update_elem(&htab, &ctx->from, zeroed_value, flags);
+	ctx->from += ctx->step;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int overwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	return write_htab(i, ctx, 0);
+}
+
+static int newwrite_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	return write_htab(i, ctx, BPF_NOEXIST);
+}
+
+static int del_htab(unsigned int i, struct update_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	if (ctx->from >= MAX_ENTRIES)
+		return 1;
+
+	bpf_map_delete_elem(&htab, &ctx->from);
+	ctx->from += ctx->step;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
+int overwrite(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct update_ctx update;
+
+	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	update.step = nr_thread;
+	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
+int batch_add_batch_del(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct update_ctx update;
+
+	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	update.step = nr_thread;
+	bpf_loop(64, overwrite_htab, &update, 0);
+
+	update.from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);
+
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 2);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
+int add_del_on_diff_cpu(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct update_ctx update;
+	unsigned int from;
+
+	from = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	update.from = from / 2;
+	update.step = nr_thread / 2;
+
+	if (from & 1)
+		bpf_loop(64, newwrite_htab, &update, 0);
+	else
+		bpf_loop(64, del_htab, &update, 0);
+
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(&op_cnt, 1);
+	return 0;
+}