Message ID | 20230620073228.363207-2-dmantipov@yandex.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Toke Høiland-Jørgensen |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] wifi: ath9k: avoid using uninitialized array | expand |
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 10:31 +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > When compiling with gcc 13.1 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, > I've noticed the following: > > In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’, > inlined from ‘ath_tx_complete_aggr’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:556:4, > inlined from ‘ath_tx_process_buffer’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:773:3: > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:529:25: warning: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ > declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); > maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] > 529 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’, > inlined from ‘ath_tx_count_frames’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:473:3, > inlined from ‘ath_tx_complete_aggr’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:572:2, > inlined from ‘ath_tx_process_buffer’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:773:3: > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:529:25: warning: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ > declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); > maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] > 529 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > In both cases, the compiler complains on: > > memcpy(ba, &ts->ba_low, WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); > > which is the legal way to copy both 'ba_low' and following 'ba_high' > members of 'struct ath_tx_status' at once (that is, issue one 8-byte > 'memcpy()' for two 4-byte fields). Since the fortification logic > seems interprets this trick as an attempt to overread 4-byte 'ba_low', > relevant warnings may be silenced by specifying source buffer with > 'offsetof()' of the 'ba_low' instead of using an address of the latter. > I think other places have typically fixed that with a struct_group, say e.g. commit bfcc8ba45eb8 ("wifi: ath: Silence memcpy run-time false positive warning"). To me, that seems slightly better since it still ensures you're actually in the fields you wanted? But dunno. johannes
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c index 8babaaacacf5..5a70395a3a2a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ static void ath_tx_count_frames(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf, if (isaggr) { seq_st = ts->ts_seqnum; - memcpy(ba, &ts->ba_low, WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); + memcpy(ba, ts + offsetof(struct ath_tx_status, ba_low), + WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); } while (bf) { @@ -553,7 +554,8 @@ static void ath_tx_complete_aggr(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_txq *txq, if (isaggr && txok) { if (ts->ts_flags & ATH9K_TX_BA) { seq_st = ts->ts_seqnum; - memcpy(ba, &ts->ba_low, WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); + memcpy(ba, ts + offsetof(struct ath_tx_status, ba_low), + WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); } else { /* * AR5416 can become deaf/mute when BA
When compiling with gcc 13.1 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following: In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’, inlined from ‘ath_tx_complete_aggr’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:556:4, inlined from ‘ath_tx_process_buffer’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:773:3: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:529:25: warning: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] 529 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’, inlined from ‘ath_tx_count_frames’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:473:3, inlined from ‘ath_tx_complete_aggr’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:572:2, inlined from ‘ath_tx_process_buffer’ at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c:773:3: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:529:25: warning: call to ‘__read_overflow2_field’ declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] 529 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In both cases, the compiler complains on: memcpy(ba, &ts->ba_low, WME_BA_BMP_SIZE >> 3); which is the legal way to copy both 'ba_low' and following 'ba_high' members of 'struct ath_tx_status' at once (that is, issue one 8-byte 'memcpy()' for two 4-byte fields). Since the fortification logic seems interprets this trick as an attempt to overread 4-byte 'ba_low', relevant warnings may be silenced by specifying source buffer with 'offsetof()' of the 'ba_low' instead of using an address of the latter. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)