mbox series

[v3,0/3] spi: Helper for deriving timeout values

Message ID 20230622090634.3411468-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series spi: Helper for deriving timeout values | expand

Message

Miquel Raynal June 22, 2023, 9:06 a.m. UTC
Hello,

I recently came across an issue with the Atmel spi controller driver
which would stop my transfers after a too small timeout when performing
big transfers (reading a 4MiB flash in one transfer). My initial idea
was to derive a the maximum amount of time a transfer would take
depending on its size and use that as value to avoid erroring-out when
not relevant. Mark wanted to go further by creating a core helper doing
that, based on the heuristics from the sun6i driver.

Here is a small series of 3 patches doing exactly that.

Cheers,
Miquèl

Changes in v3:
* Collected a tag.
* As my platform runs on 6.1 currently, I cherry-picked a mainline patch
  changing s/master/host/ in the atmel controller driver and modified the
  series to fit the new naming. I then cherry-picked my three patches and
  verified it compiled correctly against a v6.4-rc1.

Miquel Raynal (3):
  spi: Create a helper to derive adaptive timeouts
  spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers
  spi: sun6i: Use the new helper to derive the xfer timeout value

 drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/spi/spi.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Jernej Škrabec June 22, 2023, 4:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Dne četrtek, 22. junij 2023 ob 11:06:31 CEST je Miquel Raynal napisal(a):
> Hello,
> 
> I recently came across an issue with the Atmel spi controller driver
> which would stop my transfers after a too small timeout when performing
> big transfers (reading a 4MiB flash in one transfer). My initial idea
> was to derive a the maximum amount of time a transfer would take
> depending on its size and use that as value to avoid erroring-out when
> not relevant. Mark wanted to go further by creating a core helper doing
> that, based on the heuristics from the sun6i driver.
> 
> Here is a small series of 3 patches doing exactly that.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miquèl
> 
> Changes in v3:
> * Collected a tag.

Did you? I don't see my a-b at patch 3.

Best regards,
Jernej

> * As my platform runs on 6.1 currently, I cherry-picked a mainline patch
>   changing s/master/host/ in the atmel controller driver and modified the
>   series to fit the new naming. I then cherry-picked my three patches and
>   verified it compiled correctly against a v6.4-rc1.
> 
> Miquel Raynal (3):
>   spi: Create a helper to derive adaptive timeouts
>   spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers
>   spi: sun6i: Use the new helper to derive the xfer timeout value
> 
>  drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c |  2 +-
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
>
Miquel Raynal June 22, 2023, 9:18 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jernej,

jernej.skrabec@gmail.com wrote on Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:46:27 +0200:

> Dne četrtek, 22. junij 2023 ob 11:06:31 CEST je Miquel Raynal napisal(a):
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I recently came across an issue with the Atmel spi controller driver
> > which would stop my transfers after a too small timeout when performing
> > big transfers (reading a 4MiB flash in one transfer). My initial idea
> > was to derive a the maximum amount of time a transfer would take
> > depending on its size and use that as value to avoid erroring-out when
> > not relevant. Mark wanted to go further by creating a core helper doing
> > that, based on the heuristics from the sun6i driver.
> > 
> > Here is a small series of 3 patches doing exactly that.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Miquèl
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > * Collected a tag.  
> 
> Did you? I don't see my a-b at patch 3.

I thought I did, sorry if I missed it. Do you mind re-sending it?

> 
> Best regards,
> Jernej
> 
> > * As my platform runs on 6.1 currently, I cherry-picked a mainline patch
> >   changing s/master/host/ in the atmel controller driver and modified the
> >   series to fit the new naming. I then cherry-picked my three patches and
> >   verified it compiled correctly against a v6.4-rc1.
> > 
> > Miquel Raynal (3):
> >   spi: Create a helper to derive adaptive timeouts
> >   spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers
> >   spi: sun6i: Use the new helper to derive the xfer timeout value
> > 
> >  drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> >  drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c |  2 +-
> >  include/linux/spi/spi.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> >   
> 
> 
> 
> 

Thanks,
Miquèl
Mark Brown June 23, 2023, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:06:31 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> I recently came across an issue with the Atmel spi controller driver
> which would stop my transfers after a too small timeout when performing
> big transfers (reading a 4MiB flash in one transfer). My initial idea
> was to derive a the maximum amount of time a transfer would take
> depending on its size and use that as value to avoid erroring-out when
> not relevant. Mark wanted to go further by creating a core helper doing
> that, based on the heuristics from the sun6i driver.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] spi: Create a helper to derive adaptive timeouts
      commit: d8e4ebf87018736c0c29e2eb4afe3915156483cd
[2/3] spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers
      commit: e0205d6203c2ce598ae26d4b2707ca4224a9c90b
[3/3] spi: sun6i: Use the new helper to derive the xfer timeout value
      commit: 6eef895581c9b5fcd002ff77837e0c3a4b1eecf6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark