| Message ID | 341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 4681dacadeef |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 6 and now 6 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 33 lines checked |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:10PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a > function so we can check for specific errno for specific register. > This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) > return false; > } > > +bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > +{ > + if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) > + return (errno != EPERM); > + > + return false; > +} I think we should pass errno in as a parameter and I prefer positive predicate functions, so I'd name this check_reject_set() and reverse the logic. Also, we don't want to check for KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS, because that duplicates the rejects set. I see in a later patch that riscv needs to check reg because different errors are used for different registers, but that's because KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) was erroneously added to the rejects set. KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) doesn't belong there. That register can be set, but it only supports certain input, otherwise, it correctly, results in EINVAL. We'll need the concept of a "skip set" to avoid tripping over that one. So, I think arm's function should be bool check_reject_set(int errno) { return errno == EPERM; } and riscv's should be bool check_reject_set(int errno) { return errno == EOPNOTSUPP; } > + > #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) > > #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) > printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); > } > > +bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > +{ > + return false; > +} > + > #ifdef __aarch64__ > static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > { > @@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { > reject_reg = true; > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { > + if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) { > printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); > print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); > putchar('\n'); > -- > 2.34.1 > Thanks, drew
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:09 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:10PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > > No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a > > function so we can check for specific errno for specific register. > > This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. > > > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++ > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > > index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > > @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) > > return false; > > } > > > > +bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > > +{ > > + if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) > > + return (errno != EPERM); > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > I think we should pass errno in as a parameter and I prefer positive > predicate functions, so I'd name this check_reject_set() and reverse > the logic. Also, we don't want to check for KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS, > because that duplicates the rejects set. I see in a later patch > that riscv needs to check reg because different errors are used > for different registers, but that's because KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) > was erroneously added to the rejects set. KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) > doesn't belong there. That register can be set, but it only supports > certain input, otherwise, it correctly, results in EINVAL. We'll need > the concept of a "skip set" to avoid tripping over that one. > > So, I think arm's function should be > > bool check_reject_set(int errno) > { > return errno == EPERM; > } > > and riscv's should be > > bool check_reject_set(int errno) > { > return errno == EOPNOTSUPP; > } > Sure, will add a new 'skips_set' member to 'struct vcpu_reg_sublist' and move KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) reg to it. > > + > > #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) > > > > #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) > > printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); > > } > > > > +bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > > +{ > > + return false; > > +} > > + > > #ifdef __aarch64__ > > static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > > { > > @@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { > > reject_reg = true; > > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > > - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { > > + if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) { > > printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); > > print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); > > putchar('\n'); > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > Thanks, > drew
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) return false; } +bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) +{ + if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) + return (errno != EPERM); + + return false; +} + #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); } +bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) +{ + return false; +} + #ifdef __aarch64__ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { @@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { reject_reg = true; ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { + if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) { printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n');
No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a function so we can check for specific errno for specific register. This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)