Message ID | 20230626-sensuous-clothing-124f7ae0aedf@wendy (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Probe DT extension support using riscv,isa-extensions & riscv,isa-base | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 488833ccdcac |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 6 and now 6 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 2832 this patch: 2832 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 16511 this patch: 16511 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 126 lines checked |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:19:44PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single > letter extensions, add them to it. riscv_isa_ext_data grows a new > member, signifying whether an extension is multi-letter & thus requiring > special handling. > As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as > single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions > and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the > printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data > in the process. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 36 ++++++---------------- > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > index a35bee219dd7..6ad896dc4342 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); > struct riscv_isa_ext_data { > const unsigned int id; > const char *name; > + const bool multi_letter; > }; > > extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[]; > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > index beb8b16bbf87..046d9d3dac16 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > @@ -160,41 +160,25 @@ arch_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init); > > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > > -static void print_isa_ext(struct seq_file *f) > -{ > - for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { > - const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *edata = &riscv_isa_ext[i]; > - if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, edata->id)) > - continue; > - > - seq_printf(f, "_%s", edata->name); > - } > -} > - > -/* > - * These are the only valid base (single letter) ISA extensions as per the spec. > - * It also specifies the canonical order in which it appears in the spec. > - * Some of the extension may just be a place holder for now (B, K, P, J). > - * This should be updated once corresponding extensions are ratified. > - */ > -static const char base_riscv_exts[13] = "imafdqcbkjpvh"; > - > static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f) > { > - int i; > - > seq_puts(f, "isa\t\t: "); > + > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) > seq_write(f, "rv32", 4); > else > seq_write(f, "rv64", 4); > > - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(base_riscv_exts); i++) { > - if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, base_riscv_exts[i] - 'a')) > - /* Print only enabled the base ISA extensions */ > - seq_write(f, &base_riscv_exts[i], 1); > + for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { > + if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, riscv_isa_ext[i].id)) > + continue; > + > + if (riscv_isa_ext[i].multi_letter) > + seq_puts(f, "_"); > + > + seq_printf(f, "%s", riscv_isa_ext[i].name); > } > - print_isa_ext(f); > + > seq_puts(f, "\n"); > } > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > index b5e23506c4f0..5405d8a58537 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > @@ -99,9 +99,10 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id) > return true; > } > > -#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id) { \ > - .name = #_name, \ > - .id = _id, \ > +#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _multi) { \ > + .name = #_name, \ > + .id = _id, \ > + .multi_letter = _multi, \ > } > > /* > @@ -144,24 +145,37 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id) > * New entries to this struct should follow the ordering rules described above. > */ > const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = { > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zifencei, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT), > - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(i, RISCV_ISA_EXT_i, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(m, RISCV_ISA_EXT_m, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(a, RISCV_ISA_EXT_a, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(f, RISCV_ISA_EXT_f, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(d, RISCV_ISA_EXT_d, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(q, RISCV_ISA_EXT_q, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(c, RISCV_ISA_EXT_c, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(b, RISCV_ISA_EXT_b, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(k, RISCV_ISA_EXT_k, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(j, RISCV_ISA_EXT_j, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(p, RISCV_ISA_EXT_p, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h, false), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zifencei, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT, true), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX, true), > }; > > const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext); > -- > 2.40.1 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:21 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote: > > So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single > letter extensions, add them to it. riscv_isa_ext_data grows a new > member, signifying whether an extension is multi-letter & thus requiring > special handling. > As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as > single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions > and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the > printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data > in the process. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 36 ++++++---------------- > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > index a35bee219dd7..6ad896dc4342 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); > struct riscv_isa_ext_data { > const unsigned int id; > const char *name; > + const bool multi_letter; Instead of defining a new member, could we just infer this by making a macro like #define MULTI_LETTER(name) (name[0] && name[1])?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:33:20AM -0700, Evan Green wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:21 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote: > > > > So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single > > letter extensions, add them to it. riscv_isa_ext_data grows a new > > member, signifying whether an extension is multi-letter & thus requiring > > special handling. > > As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as > > single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions > > and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the > > printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data > > in the process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 36 ++++++---------------- > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > index a35bee219dd7..6ad896dc4342 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); > > struct riscv_isa_ext_data { > > const unsigned int id; > > const char *name; > > + const bool multi_letter; > > Instead of defining a new member, could we just infer this by making a > macro like #define MULTI_LETTER(name) (name[0] && name[1])? Or don't even try to be clever like this and just call strnlen on the name & check if it is 1? It's only used in 2 places.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:43 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:33:20AM -0700, Evan Green wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:21 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote: > > > > > > So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single > > > letter extensions, add them to it. riscv_isa_ext_data grows a new > > > member, signifying whether an extension is multi-letter & thus requiring > > > special handling. > > > As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as > > > single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions > > > and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the > > > printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data > > > in the process. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + > > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 36 ++++++---------------- > > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > > index a35bee219dd7..6ad896dc4342 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); > > > struct riscv_isa_ext_data { > > > const unsigned int id; > > > const char *name; > > > + const bool multi_letter; > > > > Instead of defining a new member, could we just infer this by making a > > macro like #define MULTI_LETTER(name) (name[0] && name[1])? > > Or don't even try to be clever like this and just call strnlen on the > name & check if it is 1? It's only used in 2 places. Sounds good to me!
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h index a35bee219dd7..6ad896dc4342 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); struct riscv_isa_ext_data { const unsigned int id; const char *name; + const bool multi_letter; }; extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[]; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index beb8b16bbf87..046d9d3dac16 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -160,41 +160,25 @@ arch_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init); #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS -static void print_isa_ext(struct seq_file *f) -{ - for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { - const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *edata = &riscv_isa_ext[i]; - if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, edata->id)) - continue; - - seq_printf(f, "_%s", edata->name); - } -} - -/* - * These are the only valid base (single letter) ISA extensions as per the spec. - * It also specifies the canonical order in which it appears in the spec. - * Some of the extension may just be a place holder for now (B, K, P, J). - * This should be updated once corresponding extensions are ratified. - */ -static const char base_riscv_exts[13] = "imafdqcbkjpvh"; - static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f) { - int i; - seq_puts(f, "isa\t\t: "); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) seq_write(f, "rv32", 4); else seq_write(f, "rv64", 4); - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(base_riscv_exts); i++) { - if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, base_riscv_exts[i] - 'a')) - /* Print only enabled the base ISA extensions */ - seq_write(f, &base_riscv_exts[i], 1); + for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) { + if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, riscv_isa_ext[i].id)) + continue; + + if (riscv_isa_ext[i].multi_letter) + seq_puts(f, "_"); + + seq_printf(f, "%s", riscv_isa_ext[i].name); } - print_isa_ext(f); + seq_puts(f, "\n"); } diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index b5e23506c4f0..5405d8a58537 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -99,9 +99,10 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id) return true; } -#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id) { \ - .name = #_name, \ - .id = _id, \ +#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _multi) { \ + .name = #_name, \ + .id = _id, \ + .multi_letter = _multi, \ } /* @@ -144,24 +145,37 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id) * New entries to this struct should follow the ordering rules described above. */ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = { - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zifencei, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT), - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(i, RISCV_ISA_EXT_i, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(m, RISCV_ISA_EXT_m, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(a, RISCV_ISA_EXT_a, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(f, RISCV_ISA_EXT_f, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(d, RISCV_ISA_EXT_d, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(q, RISCV_ISA_EXT_q, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(c, RISCV_ISA_EXT_c, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(b, RISCV_ISA_EXT_b, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(k, RISCV_ISA_EXT_k, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(j, RISCV_ISA_EXT_j, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(p, RISCV_ISA_EXT_p, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h, false), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zifencei, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT, true), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX, true), }; const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
So that riscv_fill_hwcap() can use riscv_isa_ext to probe for single letter extensions, add them to it. riscv_isa_ext_data grows a new member, signifying whether an extension is multi-letter & thus requiring special handling. As a result, what gets spat out in /proc/cpuinfo will become borked, as single letter extensions will be printed as part of the base extensions and while printing from riscv_isa_arr. Take the opportunity to unify the printing of the isa string, using the new member of riscv_isa_ext_data in the process. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 36 ++++++---------------- arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)