Message ID | 20230608113420.14695-3-cloudliang@tencent.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: selftests: Add tests for PEBS and MSR_IA32_DS_AREA | expand |
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote: > From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com> > > This commit adds a PEBS test that verifies all possible combinations > of PEBS-related bits in MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES. This comprehensive > test ensures the accuracy of the PEBS feature. > > Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com> > --- > .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > index 02903084598f..c1b1ba44bc26 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ > > #define MAX_LINEAR_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(15, 8) > #define ADDR_OFS_BIT 8 > +#define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT 0x3f > +#define PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE BIT_ULL(12) > +#define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13) > +#define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_METRICS_IDX) > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_PT_IDX) > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL (PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK | PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) > > union perf_capabilities { > struct { > @@ -331,6 +337,70 @@ static void test_ds_area_noncanonical_address(union perf_capabilities host_cap) > kvm_vm_free(vm); > } > > +static void test_pebs_bit_combinations(union perf_capabilities host_cap) > +{ > + int ret; Reverse xmas tree. > + uint64_t pebs_val, val; > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > + struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, NULL); It's kinda silly, but I think it makes sense to wait until after all of the TEST_REQUIRE()s to create the VM+vCPU. > + > + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION) > 1); > + TEST_REQUIRE(host_cap.capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT); > + TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE) & > + MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL); > + > + /* > + * Test if PEBS_REC_FMT is set and the value is the same as host, > + * the other PEBS bits are allowed to be set only if they are the > + * same as host. > + */ > + pebs_val = host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL; > + > + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, pebs_val); > + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), > + (u64)pebs_val); This cast shouldn't be necessary. And if you're going to split lines... ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); Though isn't that flawed? E.g. will fail if MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES has non-PEBS bits set. I think what you want is something like: guest_perf_caps = vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES); ASSERT_EQ(guest_perf_caps & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL, host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); > + > + /* Test all PEBS bit combinations. */ > + for (val = 0x0; val <= (~0ul & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); val++) { > + /* Skips values that are not related to PEBS. */ > + if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE | > + PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE)) Align things by their scope, i.e. if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE)) But even better would be to look for !PEBS, not some other values where it's not clear they exhaustively cover all !PEBS value. E.g. can't this be? if (val & ~PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL) continue; > + continue; > + > + /* > + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when the KVM doesn't Just "KVM", not "the KVM". > + * supports Intel PT. > + */ > + if ((val & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) && > + (!(host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL))) { > + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); > + > + continue; > + } > + > + /* > + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when carrying I don't quite follow what you mean by "carrying". Do you mean a non-zero value? > + * PEBS_REC_FMT if the value of PEBS is not equal to host. > + */ > + if ((val & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) && val != pebs_val) { > + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); > + > + continue; > + } > + > + /* > + * Test that PEBS bits can be written simultaneously or > + * independently if PEBS_REC_FMT is not carried. > + */ > + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), val); > + } > + > + kvm_vm_free(vm); > +}
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> 于2023年6月29日周四 05:55写道: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote: > > From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com> > > > > This commit adds a PEBS test that verifies all possible combinations > > of PEBS-related bits in MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES. This comprehensive > > test ensures the accuracy of the PEBS feature. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com> > > --- > > .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > > index 02903084598f..c1b1ba44bc26 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c > > @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ > > > > #define MAX_LINEAR_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(15, 8) > > #define ADDR_OFS_BIT 8 > > +#define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT 0x3f > > +#define PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE BIT_ULL(12) > > +#define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13) > > +#define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_METRICS_IDX) > > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_PT_IDX) > > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL (PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK | PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) > > > > union perf_capabilities { > > struct { > > @@ -331,6 +337,70 @@ static void test_ds_area_noncanonical_address(union perf_capabilities host_cap) > > kvm_vm_free(vm); > > } > > > > +static void test_pebs_bit_combinations(union perf_capabilities host_cap) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > Reverse xmas tree. > > > + uint64_t pebs_val, val; > > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > + struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, NULL); > > It's kinda silly, but I think it makes sense to wait until after all of the > TEST_REQUIRE()s to create the VM+vCPU. > > > + > > + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION) > 1); > > + TEST_REQUIRE(host_cap.capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT); > > + TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE) & > > + MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL); > > + > > + /* > > + * Test if PEBS_REC_FMT is set and the value is the same as host, > > + * the other PEBS bits are allowed to be set only if they are the > > + * same as host. > > + */ > > + pebs_val = host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL; > > + > > + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, pebs_val); > > + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), > > + (u64)pebs_val); > > This cast shouldn't be necessary. And if you're going to split lines... > > ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), > host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); > > Though isn't that flawed? E.g. will fail if MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES has > non-PEBS bits set. I think what you want is something like: > > guest_perf_caps = vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES); > > ASSERT_EQ(guest_perf_caps & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL, > host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); > > > + > > + /* Test all PEBS bit combinations. */ > > + for (val = 0x0; val <= (~0ul & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); val++) { > > + /* Skips values that are not related to PEBS. */ > > + if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE | > > + PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE)) > > Align things by their scope, i.e. > > if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE > PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE)) > > But even better would be to look for !PEBS, not some other values where it's not > clear they exhaustively cover all !PEBS value. E.g. can't this be? > > if (val & ~PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL) > continue; > > > + continue; > > + > > + /* > > + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when the KVM doesn't > > Just "KVM", not "the KVM". > > > + * supports Intel PT. > > + */ > > + if ((val & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) && > > + (!(host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL))) { > > + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); > > + > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when carrying > > I don't quite follow what you mean by "carrying". Do you mean a non-zero value? I apologize for the confusion. Yes, by "carrying" I meant a non-zero value. I will revise the comment to clarify the meaning and make it more precise. > > > + * PEBS_REC_FMT if the value of PEBS is not equal to host. > > + */ > > + if ((val & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) && val != pebs_val) { > > + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); > > + > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Test that PEBS bits can be written simultaneously or > > + * independently if PEBS_REC_FMT is not carried. > > + */ > > + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); > > + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), val); > > + } > > + > > + kvm_vm_free(vm); > > +} Thank you for all your valuable feedback and suggestions. Your guidance has been extremely helpful in improving the quality of the code.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c index 02903084598f..c1b1ba44bc26 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ #define MAX_LINEAR_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(15, 8) #define ADDR_OFS_BIT 8 +#define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT 0x3f +#define PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE BIT_ULL(12) +#define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13) +#define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_METRICS_IDX) +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_PT_IDX) +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL (PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK | PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) union perf_capabilities { struct { @@ -331,6 +337,70 @@ static void test_ds_area_noncanonical_address(union perf_capabilities host_cap) kvm_vm_free(vm); } +static void test_pebs_bit_combinations(union perf_capabilities host_cap) +{ + int ret; + uint64_t pebs_val, val; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, NULL); + + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION) > 1); + TEST_REQUIRE(host_cap.capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT); + TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE) & + MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL); + + /* + * Test if PEBS_REC_FMT is set and the value is the same as host, + * the other PEBS bits are allowed to be set only if they are the + * same as host. + */ + pebs_val = host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL; + + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, pebs_val); + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), + (u64)pebs_val); + + /* Test all PEBS bit combinations. */ + for (val = 0x0; val <= (~0ul & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); val++) { + /* Skips values that are not related to PEBS. */ + if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE | + PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE)) + continue; + + /* + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when the KVM doesn't + * supports Intel PT. + */ + if ((val & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) && + (!(host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL))) { + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when carrying + * PEBS_REC_FMT if the value of PEBS is not equal to host. + */ + if ((val & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) && val != pebs_val) { + ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Test that PEBS bits can be written simultaneously or + * independently if PEBS_REC_FMT is not carried. + */ + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); + ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), val); + } + + kvm_vm_free(vm); +} + int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { union perf_capabilities host_cap; @@ -352,4 +422,5 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) test_guest_wrmsr_perf_capabilities(host_cap); test_lbr_perf_capabilities(host_cap); test_ds_area_noncanonical_address(host_cap); + test_pebs_bit_combinations(host_cap); }