| Message ID | 0a418f26388e744b6ae2f17639bea08a05643549.1688010022.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API | expand |
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 09:42:59PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > Add new skips_set members to vcpu_reg_sublist so as to skip > set operation on some registers. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 20 +++++++++++++------ > .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > index 74fb6f6fdd09..1a32a900aeea 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > { > int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; > int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; > + int skipped_set = 0; > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > struct kvm_vm *vm; > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > .id = reg_list->reg[i], > .addr = (__u64)&addr, > }; > - bool reject_reg = false; > + bool reject_reg = false, skip_reg = false; > int ret; > > ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); > @@ -221,8 +222,8 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > ++failed_get; > } > > - /* rejects_set registers are rejected after KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE */ > for_each_sublist(c, s) { > + /* rejects_set registers are rejected for set operation */ > if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { > reject_reg = true; > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > @@ -234,9 +235,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > } > break; > } > + > + /* skips_set registers are skipped for set operation */ > + if (s->skips_set && find_reg(s->skips_set, s->skips_set_n, reg.id)) { > + skip_reg = true; > + ++skipped_set; > + break; > + } > } > > - if (!reject_reg) { > + if (!reject_reg && !skip_reg) { > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > if (ret) { > printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); > @@ -281,9 +289,9 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > } > > TEST_ASSERT(!missing_regs && !failed_get && !failed_set && !failed_reject, > - "%s: There are %d missing registers; " > - "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject", > - config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject); > + "%s: There are %d missing registers; %d registers failed get; " > + "%d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject; %d registers skipped set", > + config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject, skipped_set); > > pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c)); > blessed_n = 0; > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > index e4480049000d..67c031fe89a1 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct vcpu_reg_sublist { > __u64 regs_n; > __u64 *rejects_set; > __u64 rejects_set_n; > + __u64 *skips_set; > + __u64 skips_set_n; > }; > > struct vcpu_reg_list { > -- > 2.34.1 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 10:28 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 09:42:59PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > > Add new skips_set members to vcpu_reg_sublist so as to skip > > set operation on some registers. > > > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 20 +++++++++++++------ > > .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > index 74fb6f6fdd09..1a32a900aeea 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > { > > int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; > > int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; > > + int skipped_set = 0; > > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > struct kvm_vm *vm; > > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > > @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > .id = reg_list->reg[i], > > .addr = (__u64)&addr, > > }; > > - bool reject_reg = false; > > + bool reject_reg = false, skip_reg = false; > > int ret; > > > > ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); > > @@ -221,8 +222,8 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > ++failed_get; > > } > > > > - /* rejects_set registers are rejected after KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE */ > > for_each_sublist(c, s) { > > + /* rejects_set registers are rejected for set operation */ > > if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { > > reject_reg = true; > > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > > @@ -234,9 +235,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > } > > break; > > } > > + > > + /* skips_set registers are skipped for set operation */ > > + if (s->skips_set && find_reg(s->skips_set, s->skips_set_n, reg.id)) { > > + skip_reg = true; > > + ++skipped_set; > > + break; > > + } > > } > > > > - if (!reject_reg) { > > + if (!reject_reg && !skip_reg) { > > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > > if (ret) { > > printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); > > @@ -281,9 +289,9 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > } > > > > TEST_ASSERT(!missing_regs && !failed_get && !failed_set && !failed_reject, > > - "%s: There are %d missing registers; " > > - "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject", > > - config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject); > > + "%s: There are %d missing registers; %d registers failed get; " > > + "%d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject; %d registers skipped set", > > + config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject, skipped_set); > > > > pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c)); > > blessed_n = 0; > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > index e4480049000d..67c031fe89a1 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct vcpu_reg_sublist { > > __u64 regs_n; > > __u64 *rejects_set; > > __u64 rejects_set_n; > > + __u64 *skips_set; > > + __u64 skips_set_n; > > }; > > > > struct vcpu_reg_list { > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Thanks!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index 74fb6f6fdd09..1a32a900aeea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; + int skipped_set = 0; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; struct kvm_vm *vm; struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) .id = reg_list->reg[i], .addr = (__u64)&addr, }; - bool reject_reg = false; + bool reject_reg = false, skip_reg = false; int ret; ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); @@ -221,8 +222,8 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) ++failed_get; } - /* rejects_set registers are rejected after KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE */ for_each_sublist(c, s) { + /* rejects_set registers are rejected for set operation */ if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { reject_reg = true; ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); @@ -234,9 +235,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } break; } + + /* skips_set registers are skipped for set operation */ + if (s->skips_set && find_reg(s->skips_set, s->skips_set_n, reg.id)) { + skip_reg = true; + ++skipped_set; + break; + } } - if (!reject_reg) { + if (!reject_reg && !skip_reg) { ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); if (ret) { printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); @@ -281,9 +289,9 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } TEST_ASSERT(!missing_regs && !failed_get && !failed_set && !failed_reject, - "%s: There are %d missing registers; " - "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject", - config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject); + "%s: There are %d missing registers; %d registers failed get; " + "%d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject; %d registers skipped set", + config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject, skipped_set); pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c)); blessed_n = 0; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h index e4480049000d..67c031fe89a1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct vcpu_reg_sublist { __u64 regs_n; __u64 *rejects_set; __u64 rejects_set_n; + __u64 *skips_set; + __u64 skips_set_n; }; struct vcpu_reg_list {
Add new skips_set members to vcpu_reg_sublist so as to skip set operation on some registers. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 20 +++++++++++++------ .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)