Message ID | cover.1686063941.git.oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support | expand |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:22:26PM +0000, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote: > This Patch series is intended to introduce the potential generic driver for > pin controls over SCMI protocol, provided in the latest beta version of DEN0056 [0]. > > On ARM-based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control Processor (SCP) > provides control on pins, as well as with power, clocks, reset controllers. In this case, > kernel should use one of the possible transports, described in [0] to access SCP and > control clocks/power-domains etc. This driver is using SMC transport to communicate with SCP via > SCMI protocol and access to the Pin Control Subsystem. > Hi Oleksii, sorry this review has been a bit delayed, I tested V3 in my setup and found no practical issue. I'll post a few comments/remarks along the series. Beside addressing pending comments, I suppose that the next step will be anyway to address the upcoming changes in the new v3.2 BETA regarding support for multiple type/value set/get operations as requested by Peng. Thanks, Cristian
Hi Cristian, Thanks for the testing and for the review. I will address all comments and v4 will be with v3.2 BETA changes. Best regards, Oleksii. On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:22:26PM +0000, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote: > > This Patch series is intended to introduce the potential generic driver for > > pin controls over SCMI protocol, provided in the latest beta version of DEN0056 [0]. > > > > On ARM-based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control Processor (SCP) > > provides control on pins, as well as with power, clocks, reset controllers. In this case, > > kernel should use one of the possible transports, described in [0] to access SCP and > > control clocks/power-domains etc. This driver is using SMC transport to communicate with SCP via > > SCMI protocol and access to the Pin Control Subsystem. > > > > Hi Oleksii, > > sorry this review has been a bit delayed, I tested V3 in my setup and found no > practical issue. I'll post a few comments/remarks along the series. > > Beside addressing pending comments, I suppose that the next step will be anyway > to address the upcoming changes in the new v3.2 BETA regarding support for > multiple type/value set/get operations as requested by Peng. > > Thanks, > Cristian