Message ID | 20100708093755.16352.75290.stgit@baageli.muru.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [100708 17:46]: > Tony Lindgren had written, on 07/08/2010 04:37 AM, the following: > > > >@@ -112,6 +114,12 @@ void omap_get_die_id(struct omap_die_id *odi) > > odi->id_3 = read_tap_reg(OMAP_TAP_DIE_ID_3); > > } > >+u32 omap2_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) > >+{ > >+ /* REVISIT: Add necessary omap2 feature tests here */ > >+ return ((feat_mask & omap_features) == feat_mask); > >+} > >+ > > I did consider this path initially, > a) Additional functional call overhead here. some of the calls to > has_feature() will get called through pretty active paths, we would > like it to be minimized to compile time optimized inline function as > much as possible.(no reason why this cant me a inline macro in > cpu.h?) - Well it should not matter how slow this code is, it should only be used to initialize things during __init. Any code doing detection after initialization is wrong. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tony Lindgren had written, on 07/09/2010 02:08 AM, the following: > * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [100708 17:46]: >> Tony Lindgren had written, on 07/08/2010 04:37 AM, the following: >>> @@ -112,6 +114,12 @@ void omap_get_die_id(struct omap_die_id *odi) >>> odi->id_3 = read_tap_reg(OMAP_TAP_DIE_ID_3); >>> } >>> +u32 omap2_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) >>> +{ >>> + /* REVISIT: Add necessary omap2 feature tests here */ >>> + return ((feat_mask & omap_features) == feat_mask); >>> +} >>> + >> I did consider this path initially, >> a) Additional functional call overhead here. some of the calls to >> has_feature() will get called through pretty active paths, we would >> like it to be minimized to compile time optimized inline function as >> much as possible.(no reason why this cant me a inline macro in >> cpu.h?) - > > Well it should not matter how slow this code is, it should only be > used to initialize things during __init. > > Any code doing detection after initialization is wrong. couple of reasons why this may not make sense: a) drivers can be modules -e.g. lets say dss driver would like to know if vrfb OR tiler is used -> __init wont make sense b) has_feature could be used as part of data flow to make decision what is to be done. e.g. lets say dma chaining as a feature OR dma list as a feature, we should allow for usage such as the following: int chain_dma(...) { if (!omap_has_feature(OMAP_HAS_DMA_CHAINING)) { return -EINVAL; } } this means that we would prefer these kind of path to be high performance paths (data paths) - aka inline functions make more sense than incurring a function call overhead.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c index fd1904b..a2e5965 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ static struct omap_chip_id omap_chip; static unsigned int omap_revision; +static u32 omap_features; +/* REVISIT: Get rid of omap3_features */ u32 omap3_features; unsigned int omap_rev(void) @@ -112,6 +114,12 @@ void omap_get_die_id(struct omap_die_id *odi) odi->id_3 = read_tap_reg(OMAP_TAP_DIE_ID_3); } +u32 omap2_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) +{ + /* REVISIT: Add necessary omap2 feature tests here */ + return ((feat_mask & omap_features) == feat_mask); +} + static void __init omap24xx_check_revision(void) { int i, j; @@ -164,6 +172,15 @@ static void __init omap24xx_check_revision(void) if ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0x0f) pr_info("ES%x", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf); pr_info("\n"); + + omap_features = 0; + omap_init_features(omap2_has_feature); +} + +u32 omap3_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) +{ + /* REVISIT: Add necessary omap3 feature tests here */ + return ((feat_mask & omap_features) == feat_mask); } #define OMAP3_CHECK_FEATURE(status,feat) \ @@ -194,6 +211,11 @@ static void __init omap3_check_features(void) * TODO: Get additional info (where applicable) * e.g. Size of L2 cache. */ + + /* REVISIT: Get rid of omap3_features */ + omap_features = omap3_features; + + omap_init_features(omap3_has_feature); } static void __init omap3_check_revision(void) @@ -277,6 +299,12 @@ static void __init omap3_check_revision(void) } } +u32 omap4_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) +{ + /* REVISIT: Add necessary omap4 feature tests here */ + return ((feat_mask & omap_features) == feat_mask); +} + static void __init omap4_check_revision(void) { u32 idcode; @@ -297,6 +325,10 @@ static void __init omap4_check_revision(void) omap_revision = OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0; omap_chip.oc |= CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1; pr_info("OMAP%04x %s\n", omap_rev() >> 16, rev_name); + + omap_features = 0; + omap_init_features(omap4_has_feature); + return; } diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c index 893a53a..d00b242 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c @@ -89,6 +89,21 @@ void __init omap_reserve(void) omap_vram_reserve_sdram_lmb(); } +static int (*_omap_check_feature)(u32 feat_mask); + +u32 omap_has_feature(u32 feat_mask) +{ + if (!_omap_check_feature) + return 0; + + return _omap_check_feature(feat_mask); +} + +void __init omap_init_features(u32 (*check_feature)(u32 feat)) +{ + _omap_check_feature = check_feature; +} + /* * 32KHz clocksource ... always available, on pretty most chips except * OMAP 730 and 1510. Other timers could be used as clocksources, with diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h index aa2f4f0..127df06 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ struct omap_chip_id { u8 type; }; +u32 omap_has_feature(u32 feat_mask); +void omap_init_features(u32 (*check_feature)(u32 feat)); + #define OMAP_CHIP_INIT(x) { .oc = x } /*