Message ID | 20230721131800.20003-4-bhe@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | percpu: some trivial cleanup patches | expand |
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:18:00PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > The variable 'err' is assgigned to an error message if atomic alloc > failed, while it has no chance to be printed if is_atomic is true. > > Here change to print error message too if atomic alloc failed, while > avoid to call dump_stack() if that case. > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> > --- > mm/percpu.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c > index c25b058a46ad..74f75ef0ad58 100644 > --- a/mm/percpu.c > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > @@ -1890,13 +1890,15 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, > fail: > trace_percpu_alloc_percpu_fail(reserved, is_atomic, size, align); > > - if (!is_atomic && do_warn && warn_limit) { > + if (do_warn && warn_limit) { > pr_warn("allocation failed, size=%zu align=%zu atomic=%d, %s\n", > size, align, is_atomic, err); > - dump_stack(); > + if (is_atomic) > + dump_stack(); This should be (!is_atomic) to preserve the current logic? > if (!--warn_limit) > pr_info("limit reached, disable warning\n"); > } > + > if (is_atomic) { > /* see the flag handling in pcpu_balance_workfn() */ > pcpu_atomic_alloc_failed = true; > -- > 2.34.1 > Thanks, Dennis
On 07/21/23 at 02:03pm, Dennis Zhou wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:18:00PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > The variable 'err' is assgigned to an error message if atomic alloc > > failed, while it has no chance to be printed if is_atomic is true. > > > > Here change to print error message too if atomic alloc failed, while > > avoid to call dump_stack() if that case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> > > --- > > mm/percpu.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c > > index c25b058a46ad..74f75ef0ad58 100644 > > --- a/mm/percpu.c > > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > > @@ -1890,13 +1890,15 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, > > fail: > > trace_percpu_alloc_percpu_fail(reserved, is_atomic, size, align); > > > > - if (!is_atomic && do_warn && warn_limit) { > > + if (do_warn && warn_limit) { > > pr_warn("allocation failed, size=%zu align=%zu atomic=%d, %s\n", > > size, align, is_atomic, err); > > - dump_stack(); > > + if (is_atomic) > > + dump_stack(); > > This should be (!is_atomic) to preserve the current logic? You are quite right, I must be dizzy at the moment when making change. Will fix this. Thanks for reviewing. > > > if (!--warn_limit) > > pr_info("limit reached, disable warning\n"); > > } > > + > > if (is_atomic) { > > /* see the flag handling in pcpu_balance_workfn() */ > > pcpu_atomic_alloc_failed = true; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > Thanks, > Dennis >
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c index c25b058a46ad..74f75ef0ad58 100644 --- a/mm/percpu.c +++ b/mm/percpu.c @@ -1890,13 +1890,15 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, fail: trace_percpu_alloc_percpu_fail(reserved, is_atomic, size, align); - if (!is_atomic && do_warn && warn_limit) { + if (do_warn && warn_limit) { pr_warn("allocation failed, size=%zu align=%zu atomic=%d, %s\n", size, align, is_atomic, err); - dump_stack(); + if (is_atomic) + dump_stack(); if (!--warn_limit) pr_info("limit reached, disable warning\n"); } + if (is_atomic) { /* see the flag handling in pcpu_balance_workfn() */ pcpu_atomic_alloc_failed = true;
The variable 'err' is assgigned to an error message if atomic alloc failed, while it has no chance to be printed if is_atomic is true. Here change to print error message too if atomic alloc failed, while avoid to call dump_stack() if that case. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> --- mm/percpu.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)