diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,4/4] vsock/test: MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET

Message ID 20230719192708.1775162-5-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series virtio/vsock: some updates for MSG_PEEK flag | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 3 of 3 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 106 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Arseniy Krasnov July 19, 2023, 7:27 p.m. UTC
This adds MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It works in the same way as
SOCK_STREAM test, except it also tests MSG_TRUNC flag.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Stefano Garzarella July 25, 2023, 3:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:27:08PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It works in the same way as
>SOCK_STREAM test, except it also tests MSG_TRUNC flag.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>---
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>index 444a3ff0681f..2ca2cbfa9808 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>@@ -257,14 +257,19 @@ static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>
> #define MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN 64
>
>-static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+static void __test_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts,

Let's stay with just test_msg_peek_client(), WDYT?

>+				   bool seqpacket)
> {
> 	unsigned char buf[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
> 	ssize_t send_size;
> 	int fd;
> 	int i;
>
>-	fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+	if (seqpacket)
>+		fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+	else
>+		fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+
> 	if (fd < 0) {
> 		perror("connect");
> 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>@@ -290,7 +295,8 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> 	close(fd);
> }
>
>-static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+static void __test_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts,

Same here.

The rest LGTM!

Also the whole series should be ready for net-next, right?

Stefano
Arseniy Krasnov July 25, 2023, 3:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On 25.07.2023 18:41, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:27:08PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It works in the same way as
>> SOCK_STREAM test, except it also tests MSG_TRUNC flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>> index 444a3ff0681f..2ca2cbfa9808 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>> @@ -257,14 +257,19 @@ static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>>
>> #define MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN 64
>>
>> -static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>> +static void __test_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts,
> 
> Let's stay with just test_msg_peek_client(), WDYT?
> 
>> +                   bool seqpacket)
>> {
>>     unsigned char buf[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
>>     ssize_t send_size;
>>     int fd;
>>     int i;
>>
>> -    fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>> +    if (seqpacket)
>> +        fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>> +    else
>> +        fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>> +
>>     if (fd < 0) {
>>         perror("connect");
>>         exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> @@ -290,7 +295,8 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>>     close(fd);
>> }
>>
>> -static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>> +static void __test_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts,
> 
> Same here.
> 
> The rest LGTM!

Ok! I'll update.

> 
> Also the whole series should be ready for net-next, right?

Yes, I'll fix these two things and resend this as 'net-next'

Thanks, Arseniy

> 
> Stefano
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 444a3ff0681f..2ca2cbfa9808 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -257,14 +257,19 @@  static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 
 #define MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN 64
 
-static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+static void __test_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts,
+				   bool seqpacket)
 {
 	unsigned char buf[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
 	ssize_t send_size;
 	int fd;
 	int i;
 
-	fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
+	if (seqpacket)
+		fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
+	else
+		fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
+
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		perror("connect");
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
@@ -290,7 +295,8 @@  static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
-static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+static void __test_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts,
+				   bool seqpacket)
 {
 	unsigned char buf_half[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN / 2];
 	unsigned char buf_normal[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
@@ -298,7 +304,11 @@  static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	ssize_t res;
 	int fd;
 
-	fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
+	if (seqpacket)
+		fd = vsock_seqpacket_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
+	else
+		fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
+
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		perror("accept");
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
@@ -340,6 +350,21 @@  static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 	}
 
+	if (seqpacket) {
+		/* This type of socket supports MSG_TRUNC flag,
+		 * so check it with MSG_PEEK. We must get length
+		 * of the message.
+		 */
+		res = recv(fd, buf_half, sizeof(buf_half), MSG_PEEK |
+			   MSG_TRUNC);
+		if (res != sizeof(buf_peek)) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+				"recv(2) + MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC, exp %zu, got %zi\n",
+				sizeof(buf_half), res);
+			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+		}
+	}
+
 	res = recv(fd, buf_normal, sizeof(buf_normal), 0);
 	if (res != sizeof(buf_normal)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "recv(2), expected %zu, got %zi\n",
@@ -356,6 +381,16 @@  static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	return __test_msg_peek_client(opts, false);
+}
+
+static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	return __test_msg_peek_server(opts, false);
+}
+
 #define SOCK_BUF_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
 #define MAX_MSG_SIZE (32 * 1024)
 
@@ -1125,6 +1160,16 @@  static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+static void test_seqpacket_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	return __test_msg_peek_client(opts, true);
+}
+
+static void test_seqpacket_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	return __test_msg_peek_server(opts, true);
+}
+
 static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
@@ -1200,6 +1245,11 @@  static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
 		.run_client = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client,
 		.run_server = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server,
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "SOCK_SEQPACKET MSG_PEEK",
+		.run_client = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_client,
+		.run_server = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_server,
+	},
 	{},
 };