diff mbox series

[v2,17/47] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker

Message ID 20230724094354.90817-18-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink | expand

Commit Message

Qi Zheng July 24, 2023, 9:43 a.m. UTC 
Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Muchun Song July 26, 2023, 7:04 a.m. UTC | #1 
> On Jul 24, 2023, at 17:43, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
> 
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 43229d2b0c44..919f17561733 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1397,12 +1397,7 @@ lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> return count ? count : SHRINK_STOP;
> }
> 
> -static struct shrinker lazy_rcu_shrinker = {
> -	.count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count,
> -	.scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan,
> -	.batch = 0,
> -	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
> -};
> +static struct shrinker *lazy_rcu_shrinker;

Seems there is no users of this variable, maybe we could drop
this.
Qi Zheng July 26, 2023, 9:24 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 2023/7/26 15:04, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2023, at 17:43, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>
>> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> index 43229d2b0c44..919f17561733 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> @@ -1397,12 +1397,7 @@ lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> return count ? count : SHRINK_STOP;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct shrinker lazy_rcu_shrinker = {
>> -	.count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count,
>> -	.scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan,
>> -	.batch = 0,
>> -	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
>> -};
>> +static struct shrinker *lazy_rcu_shrinker;
> 
> Seems there is no users of this variable, maybe we could drop
> this.

Yeah, will change it to a local variable. And the patch #15 is
the same.

>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 43229d2b0c44..919f17561733 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1397,12 +1397,7 @@  lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	return count ? count : SHRINK_STOP;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker lazy_rcu_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan,
-	.batch = 0,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *lazy_rcu_shrinker;
 #endif // #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
 
 void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
@@ -1436,8 +1431,16 @@  void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
 		return;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
-	if (register_shrinker(&lazy_rcu_shrinker, "rcu-lazy"))
-		pr_err("Failed to register lazy_rcu shrinker!\n");
+	lazy_rcu_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "rcu-lazy");
+	if (!lazy_rcu_shrinker) {
+		pr_err("Failed to allocate lazy_rcu shrinker!\n");
+	} else {
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count;
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan;
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+		shrinker_register(lazy_rcu_shrinker);
+	}
 #endif // #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
 
 	if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {