Message ID | 20230712193514.740033-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 8c82d2bf5944123d8e90d01bf27655497d9aa321 |
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/riscv: fix potential build failure during the "emit_tests" step | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Single patches do not need cover letters |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be fixes at HEAD b690e266dae2 |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag present in non-next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | Fixes tag looks correct |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
Hi John, On 12/07/2023 21:35, John Hubbard wrote: > The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are > improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all" > target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df > ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has > caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar > failures for riscv. > > To fix this, simply remove the unnecessary "all" dependency from the > emit_tests target. The dependency is still effectively honored, because > again, invocation is via "install", which also depends upon "all". > > An alternative approach would be to harden the emit_tests target so that > it can depend upon "all", but that's a lot more complicated and hard to > get right, and doesn't seem worth it, especially given that emit_tests > should probably not be overridden at all. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20230710-kselftest-fix-arm64-v1-1-48e872844f25@kernel.org > > Fixes: 9fc96c7c19df ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built") > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> > --- > > Andrew, > > With this, and with my arm64 fix [2] that you've already put into > mm-unstable, you should be able to safely drop commit 819187ab8741 > ("selftests: fix arm64 test installation"). > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/20230711005629.2547838-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com > > thanks, > John Hubbard > > > tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile > index 9dd629cc86aa..f4b3d5c9af5b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ run_tests: all > done > > # Avoid any output on non riscv on emit_tests > -emit_tests: all > +emit_tests: > @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ > BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ > $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ > > base-commit: 3f01e9fed8454dcd89727016c3e5b2fbb8f8e50c > prerequisite-patch-id: 37c92f7425689ff069fb83996a25cd98e78d7242 Perfect timing, I have just encountered this failure this morning: make[5]: *** [../../lib.mk:81: kernel_header_files] Error 1 that your patch fixed :) So you can add: Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Thank you! Alex
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:35:14 -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are > improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all" > target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df > ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has > caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar > failures for riscv. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] selftests/riscv: fix potential build failure during the "emit_tests" step https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/8c82d2bf5944 Best regards,
Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:35:14 -0700 you wrote: > The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are > improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all" > target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df > ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has > caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar > failures for riscv. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - selftests/riscv: fix potential build failure during the "emit_tests" step https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/8c82d2bf5944 You are awesome, thank you!
On 8/3/23 08:45, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:35:14 -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are >> improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all" >> target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df >> ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has >> caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar >> failures for riscv. >> >> [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/1] selftests/riscv: fix potential build failure during the "emit_tests" step > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/8c82d2bf5944 > > Best regards, This is already in Linus's tree. I sent this in for Linux 6.5-rc3 c77896b143d3c9c3e84c4ed0662b807ccbd8730b selftests/riscv: fix potential build failure during the "emit_tests" step thanks, -- Shuah
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile index 9dd629cc86aa..f4b3d5c9af5b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ run_tests: all done # Avoid any output on non riscv on emit_tests -emit_tests: all +emit_tests: @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \
The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all" target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar failures for riscv. To fix this, simply remove the unnecessary "all" dependency from the emit_tests target. The dependency is still effectively honored, because again, invocation is via "install", which also depends upon "all". An alternative approach would be to harden the emit_tests target so that it can depend upon "all", but that's a lot more complicated and hard to get right, and doesn't seem worth it, especially given that emit_tests should probably not be overridden at all. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20230710-kselftest-fix-arm64-v1-1-48e872844f25@kernel.org Fixes: 9fc96c7c19df ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built") Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> --- Andrew, With this, and with my arm64 fix [2] that you've already put into mm-unstable, you should be able to safely drop commit 819187ab8741 ("selftests: fix arm64 test installation"). [2] https://lore.kernel.org/20230711005629.2547838-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com thanks, John Hubbard tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) base-commit: 3f01e9fed8454dcd89727016c3e5b2fbb8f8e50c prerequisite-patch-id: 37c92f7425689ff069fb83996a25cd98e78d7242