Message ID | 20230809123706.1842548-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | target/arm: Fixes for RME | expand |
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 13:37, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote: > > A few patches to fix RME support and allow booting a realm guest, based > on "[PATCH v2 00/15] target/arm/ptw: Cleanups and a few bugfixes" > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230807141514.19075-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org/ > > Since v2: > > * Updated the comment in patch 5. I also removed the check for FEAT_RME, > because as pointed out in "target/arm: Catch illegal-exception-return > from EL3 with bad NSE/NS", the SCR_NSE bit can only be set with > FEAT_RME enabled. Because of this additional change, I didn't add the > Reviewed-by. > > * Added an EL-change hook to patch 6, to update the timer IRQ > when changing the security state. I was wondering whether the > el_change function should filter security state changes, since we only > need to update IRQ state when switching between Root and > Secure/NonSecure. But with a small syscall benchmark exercising > EL0-EL1 switch with FEAT_RME enabled, I couldn't see any difference > with and without the el_change hook, so I kept it simple. > > * Also added the .raw_write callback for CNTHCTL_EL2. > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802170157.401491-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/ This didn't build for the linux-user targets. I squashed this into patch 6: diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c index 7df1f7600b1..d906d2b1caa 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.c +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c @@ -2169,9 +2169,11 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VBAR); } - if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_rme, cpu)) { +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY + if (tcg_enabled() && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_rme, cpu)) { arm_register_el_change_hook(cpu, >_rme_post_el_change, 0); } +#endif register_cp_regs_for_features(cpu); arm_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features(cpu); With that, I've applied the series to target-arm-for-8.2. thanks -- PMM
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > This didn't build for the linux-user targets. I squashed > this into patch 6: > > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c > index 7df1f7600b1..d906d2b1caa 100644 > --- a/target/arm/cpu.c > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c > @@ -2169,9 +2169,11 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, > Error **errp) > set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VBAR); > } > > - if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_rme, cpu)) { > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > + if (tcg_enabled() && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_rme, cpu)) { > arm_register_el_change_hook(cpu, >_rme_post_el_change, 0); > } > +#endif > > register_cp_regs_for_features(cpu); > arm_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features(cpu); > > With that, I've applied the series to target-arm-for-8.2. Thank you, sorry about the build error, I'll add linux-user to my tests Thanks, Jean