diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v5,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_info

Message ID 20230811023647.3711-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fix fill_link_info and add selftest | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 94 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Yafang Shao Aug. 11, 2023, 2:36 a.m. UTC
Add selftest for the fill_link_info of uprobe, kprobe and tracepoint.
The result:

  $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=fill_link_info
  #79/1    fill_link_info/kprobe_link_info:OK
  #79/2    fill_link_info/kretprobe_link_info:OK
  #79/3    fill_link_info/kprobe_invalid_ubuff:OK
  #79/4    fill_link_info/tracepoint_link_info:OK
  #79/5    fill_link_info/uprobe_link_info:OK
  #79/6    fill_link_info/uretprobe_link_info:OK
  #79/7    fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info:OK
  #79/8    fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info:OK
  #79/9    fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff:OK
  #79      fill_link_info:OK
  Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

The test case for kprobe_multi won't be run on aarch64, as it is not
supported.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64       |   3 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c      | 342 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c      |  42 +++
 3 files changed, 387 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c

Comments

Jiri Olsa Aug. 11, 2023, 8:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:36:47AM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:

SNIP

> +void test_fill_link_info(void)
> +{
> +	struct test_fill_link_info *skel;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	skel = test_fill_link_info__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* load kallsyms to compare the addr */
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms_refresh(), "load_kallsyms_refresh"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	kprobe_addr = ksym_get_addr(KPROBE_FUNC);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_link_info"))
> +		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, false);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_link_info"))
> +		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE, false);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_invalid_ubuff"))
> +		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, true);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("tracepoint_link_info"))
> +		test_tp_fill_link_info(skel);
> +
> +	uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_func);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_link_info"))
> +		test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_link_info"))
> +		test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE);
> +
> +	qsort(kmulti_syms, KMULTI_CNT, sizeof(kmulti_syms[0]), symbols_cmp_r);

hum, what's the reason for sorting the symbols?

other than that it looks good to me

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

jirka

> +	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
> +		kmulti_addrs[i] = ksym_get_addr(kmulti_syms[i]);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_link_info"))
> +		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, false, false);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_multi_link_info"))
> +		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, false);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff"))
> +		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, true);
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	test_fill_link_info__destroy(skel);
> +}

SNIP
Martin KaFai Lau Aug. 12, 2023, 3:29 a.m. UTC | #2
On 8/10/23 7:36 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> index 3b61e8b..b2f46b6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> @@ -12,3 +12,6 @@ kprobe_multi_test/skel_api                       # libbpf: failed to load BPF sk
>   module_attach                                    # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
>   fentry_test/fentry_many_args                     # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
>   fexit_test/fexit_many_args                       # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
> +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info            # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
> +fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info         # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
> +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff                # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95

The bpf CI is failing: 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230811023647.3711-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com/

The patch author is responsible to monitor the result from patchwork.
Yafang Shao Aug. 13, 2023, 3:14 a.m. UTC | #3
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 4:07 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:36:47AM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > +void test_fill_link_info(void)
> > +{
> > +     struct test_fill_link_info *skel;
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     skel = test_fill_link_info__open_and_load();
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     /* load kallsyms to compare the addr */
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms_refresh(), "load_kallsyms_refresh"))
> > +             goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +     kprobe_addr = ksym_get_addr(KPROBE_FUNC);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_link_info"))
> > +             test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, false);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_link_info"))
> > +             test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE, false);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_invalid_ubuff"))
> > +             test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, true);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("tracepoint_link_info"))
> > +             test_tp_fill_link_info(skel);
> > +
> > +     uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_func);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_link_info"))
> > +             test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_link_info"))
> > +             test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE);
> > +
> > +     qsort(kmulti_syms, KMULTI_CNT, sizeof(kmulti_syms[0]), symbols_cmp_r);
>
> hum, what's the reason for sorting the symbols?

Kernel will sort the kprobe_multi symbols, and then store the
corresponding addresses in the same order into kmulti_link->addr. In
order to compare the addresses, we should sort them and then get the
addresses.

>
> other than that it looks good to me
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>
> jirka
>
> > +     for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
> > +             kmulti_addrs[i] = ksym_get_addr(kmulti_syms[i]);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_link_info"))
> > +             test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, false, false);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_multi_link_info"))
> > +             test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, false);
> > +     if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff"))
> > +             test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, true);
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > +     test_fill_link_info__destroy(skel);
> > +}
>
> SNIP
Yafang Shao Aug. 13, 2023, 3:15 a.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:29 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 8/10/23 7:36 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> > index 3b61e8b..b2f46b6 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
> > @@ -12,3 +12,6 @@ kprobe_multi_test/skel_api                       # libbpf: failed to load BPF sk
> >   module_attach                                    # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
> >   fentry_test/fentry_many_args                     # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
> >   fexit_test/fexit_many_args                       # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
> > +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info            # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
> > +fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info         # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
> > +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff                # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
>
> The bpf CI is failing:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230811023647.3711-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com/
>
> The patch author is responsible to monitor the result from patchwork.

Thanks for your reminder. Should rename
fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff to
fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
index 3b61e8b..b2f46b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
@@ -12,3 +12,6 @@  kprobe_multi_test/skel_api                       # libbpf: failed to load BPF sk
 module_attach                                    # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
 fentry_test/fentry_many_args                     # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
 fexit_test/fexit_many_args                       # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
+fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info            # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
+fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info         # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
+fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff                # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d768e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2023 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "trace_helpers.h"
+#include "test_fill_link_info.skel.h"
+
+#define TP_CAT "sched"
+#define TP_NAME "sched_switch"
+
+static const char *kmulti_syms[] = {
+	"bpf_fentry_test2",
+	"bpf_fentry_test1",
+	"bpf_fentry_test3",
+};
+#define KMULTI_CNT ARRAY_SIZE(kmulti_syms)
+static __u64 kmulti_addrs[KMULTI_CNT];
+
+#define KPROBE_FUNC "bpf_fentry_test1"
+static __u64 kprobe_addr;
+
+#define UPROBE_FILE "/proc/self/exe"
+static ssize_t uprobe_offset;
+/* uprobe attach point */
+static noinline void uprobe_func(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("");
+}
+
+static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long addr,
+				 ssize_t offset, ssize_t entry_offset)
+{
+	struct bpf_link_info info;
+	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
+	char buf[PATH_MAX];
+	int err;
+
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+	buf[0] = '\0';
+
+again:
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_link_info"))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, "link_type"))
+		return -1;
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.type, type, "perf_type_match"))
+		return -1;
+
+	switch (info.perf_event.type) {
+	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE:
+	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE:
+		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.offset, offset, "kprobe_offset");
+
+		/* In case kernel.kptr_restrict is not permitted or MAX_SYMS is reached */
+		if (addr)
+			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.addr, addr + entry_offset,
+				  "kprobe_addr");
+
+		if (!info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name) {
+			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
+			info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
+			info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		err = strncmp(u64_to_ptr(info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name), KPROBE_FUNC,
+			      strlen(KPROBE_FUNC));
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "cmp_kprobe_func_name");
+		break;
+	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT:
+		if (!info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name) {
+			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len, 0, "name_len");
+			info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
+			info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len = sizeof(buf);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		err = strncmp(u64_to_ptr(info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name), TP_NAME,
+			      strlen(TP_NAME));
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "cmp_tp_name");
+		break;
+	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE:
+	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE:
+		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.offset, offset, "uprobe_offset");
+
+		if (!info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name) {
+			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
+			info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
+			info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		err = strncmp(u64_to_ptr(info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name), UPROBE_FILE,
+			      strlen(UPROBE_FILE));
+			ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "cmp_file_name");
+		break;
+	default:
+		err = -1;
+		break;
+	}
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void kprobe_fill_invalid_user_buffer(int fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_link_info info;
+	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
+	int err;
+
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+
+	info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name = 0x1; /* invalid address */
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "invalid_buff_and_len");
+
+	info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len = 64;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EFAULT, "invalid_buff");
+
+	info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name = 0;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "invalid_len");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.addr, 0, "func_addr");
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.offset, 0, "func_offset");
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.type, 0, "type");
+}
+
+static void test_kprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
+				       enum bpf_perf_event_type type,
+				       bool invalid)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, opts,
+		.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LINK,
+		.retprobe = type == BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE,
+	);
+	ssize_t entry_offset = 0;
+	int link_fd, err;
+
+	skel->links.kprobe_run = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.kprobe_run,
+								 KPROBE_FUNC, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.kprobe_run, "attach_kprobe"))
+		return;
+
+	link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.kprobe_run);
+	if (!invalid) {
+		/* See also arch_adjust_kprobe_addr(). */
+		if (skel->kconfig->CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT)
+			entry_offset = 4;
+		err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, type, kprobe_addr, 0, entry_offset);
+		ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
+	} else {
+		kprobe_fill_invalid_user_buffer(link_fd);
+	}
+	bpf_link__detach(skel->links.kprobe_run);
+}
+
+static void test_tp_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel)
+{
+	int link_fd, err;
+
+	skel->links.tp_run = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(skel->progs.tp_run, TP_CAT, TP_NAME);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.tp_run, "attach_tp"))
+		return;
+
+	link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.tp_run);
+	err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT, 0, 0, 0);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
+	bpf_link__detach(skel->links.tp_run);
+}
+
+static void test_uprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
+				       enum bpf_perf_event_type type)
+{
+	int link_fd, err;
+
+	skel->links.uprobe_run = bpf_program__attach_uprobe(skel->progs.uprobe_run,
+							    type == BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE,
+							    0, /* self pid */
+							    UPROBE_FILE, uprobe_offset);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.uprobe_run, "attach_uprobe"))
+		return;
+
+	link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.uprobe_run);
+	err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, type, 0, uprobe_offset, 0);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
+	bpf_link__detach(skel->links.uprobe_run);
+}
+
+static int verify_kmulti_link_info(int fd, bool retprobe)
+{
+	struct bpf_link_info info;
+	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
+	__u64 addrs[KMULTI_CNT];
+	int flags, i, err;
+
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+
+again:
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_link_info"))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_KPROBE_MULTI, "kmulti_type"))
+		return -1;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.kprobe_multi.count, KMULTI_CNT, "func_cnt");
+	flags = info.kprobe_multi.flags & BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN;
+	if (!retprobe)
+		ASSERT_EQ(flags, 0, "kmulti_flags");
+	else
+		ASSERT_NEQ(flags, 0, "kretmulti_flags");
+
+	if (!info.kprobe_multi.addrs) {
+		info.kprobe_multi.addrs = ptr_to_u64(addrs);
+		goto again;
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
+		ASSERT_EQ(addrs[i], kmulti_addrs[i], "kmulti_addrs");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void verify_kmulti_invalid_user_buffer(int fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_link_info info;
+	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
+	__u64 addrs[KMULTI_CNT];
+	int err, i;
+
+	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+
+	info.kprobe_multi.count = KMULTI_CNT;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "no_addr");
+
+	info.kprobe_multi.addrs = ptr_to_u64(addrs);
+	info.kprobe_multi.count = 0;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "no_cnt");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
+		addrs[i] = 0;
+	info.kprobe_multi.count = KMULTI_CNT - 1;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOSPC, "smaller_cnt");
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT - 1; i++)
+		ASSERT_EQ(addrs[i], kmulti_addrs[i], "kmulti_addrs");
+	ASSERT_EQ(addrs[i], 0, "kmulti_addrs");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
+		addrs[i] = 0;
+	info.kprobe_multi.count = KMULTI_CNT + 1;
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bigger_cnt");
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
+		ASSERT_EQ(addrs[i], kmulti_addrs[i], "kmulti_addrs");
+
+	info.kprobe_multi.count = KMULTI_CNT;
+	info.kprobe_multi.addrs = 0x1; /* invalid addr */
+	err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -EFAULT, "invalid_buff");
+}
+
+static int symbols_cmp_r(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+	const char **str_a = (const char **) a;
+	const char **str_b = (const char **) b;
+
+	return strcmp(*str_a, *str_b);
+}
+
+static void test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
+					     bool retprobe, bool invalid)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+	int link_fd, err;
+
+	opts.syms = kmulti_syms;
+	opts.cnt = KMULTI_CNT;
+	opts.retprobe = retprobe;
+	skel->links.kmulti_run = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.kmulti_run,
+								       NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.kmulti_run, "attach_kprobe_multi"))
+		return;
+
+	link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.kmulti_run);
+	if (!invalid) {
+		err = verify_kmulti_link_info(link_fd, retprobe);
+		ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_kmulti_link_info");
+	} else {
+		verify_kmulti_invalid_user_buffer(link_fd);
+	}
+	bpf_link__detach(skel->links.kmulti_run);
+}
+
+void test_fill_link_info(void)
+{
+	struct test_fill_link_info *skel;
+	int i;
+
+	skel = test_fill_link_info__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		return;
+
+	/* load kallsyms to compare the addr */
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms_refresh(), "load_kallsyms_refresh"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	kprobe_addr = ksym_get_addr(KPROBE_FUNC);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_link_info"))
+		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_link_info"))
+		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_invalid_ubuff"))
+		test_kprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, true);
+	if (test__start_subtest("tracepoint_link_info"))
+		test_tp_fill_link_info(skel);
+
+	uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_func);
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_link_info"))
+		test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE);
+	if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_link_info"))
+		test_uprobe_fill_link_info(skel, BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE);
+
+	qsort(kmulti_syms, KMULTI_CNT, sizeof(kmulti_syms[0]), symbols_cmp_r);
+	for (i = 0; i < KMULTI_CNT; i++)
+		kmulti_addrs[i] = ksym_get_addr(kmulti_syms[i]);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_link_info"))
+		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, false, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kretprobe_multi_link_info"))
+		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff"))
+		test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(skel, true, true);
+
+cleanup:
+	test_fill_link_info__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..564f402
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2023 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+
+extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
+
+/* This function is here to have CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
+ * used and added to object BTF.
+ */
+int unused(void)
+{
+	return CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT ? 0 : 1;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+int BPF_PROG(kprobe_run)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe")
+int BPF_PROG(uprobe_run)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tracepoint")
+int BPF_PROG(tp_run)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe.multi")
+int BPF_PROG(kmulti_run)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";