Message ID | 20230811151847.1594958-1-elver@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4,1/4] compiler_types: Introduce the Clang __preserve_most function attribute | expand |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > [1]: "On X86-64 and AArch64 targets, this attribute changes the calling > convention of a function. The preserve_most calling convention attempts > to make the code in the caller as unintrusive as possible. This > convention behaves identically to the C calling convention on how > arguments and return values are passed, but it uses a different set of > caller/callee-saved registers. This alleviates the burden of saving and > recovering a large register set before and after the call in the caller. > If the arguments are passed in callee-saved registers, then they will be > preserved by the callee across the call. This doesn't apply for values > returned in callee-saved registers. > > * On X86-64 the callee preserves all general purpose registers, except > for R11. R11 can be used as a scratch register. Floating-point > registers (XMMs/YMMs) are not preserved and need to be saved by the > caller. > > * On AArch64 the callee preserve all general purpose registers, except > x0-X8 and X16-X18." > > [1] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#preserve-most > > Introduce the attribute to compiler_types.h as __preserve_most. > > Use of this attribute results in better code generation for calls to > very rarely called functions, such as error-reporting functions, or > rarely executed slow paths. > > Beware that the attribute conflicts with instrumentation calls inserted > on function entry which do not use __preserve_most themselves. Notably, > function tracing which assumes the normal C calling convention for the > given architecture. Where the attribute is supported, __preserve_most > will imply notrace. It is recommended to restrict use of the attribute > to functions that should or already disable tracing. > > Note: The additional preprocessor check against architecture should not > be necessary if __has_attribute() only returns true where supported; > also see https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1908. But until > __has_attribute() does the right thing, we also guard by known-supported > architectures to avoid build warnings on other architectures. > > The attribute may be supported by a future GCC version (see > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110899). > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Should this go via -mm, the hardening tree, or something else? I'm happy to carry it if no one else wants it? -Kees
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 01:21, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > > [1]: "On X86-64 and AArch64 targets, this attribute changes the calling > > convention of a function. The preserve_most calling convention attempts > > to make the code in the caller as unintrusive as possible. This > > convention behaves identically to the C calling convention on how > > arguments and return values are passed, but it uses a different set of > > caller/callee-saved registers. This alleviates the burden of saving and > > recovering a large register set before and after the call in the caller. > > If the arguments are passed in callee-saved registers, then they will be > > preserved by the callee across the call. This doesn't apply for values > > returned in callee-saved registers. > > > > * On X86-64 the callee preserves all general purpose registers, except > > for R11. R11 can be used as a scratch register. Floating-point > > registers (XMMs/YMMs) are not preserved and need to be saved by the > > caller. > > > > * On AArch64 the callee preserve all general purpose registers, except > > x0-X8 and X16-X18." > > > > [1] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#preserve-most > > > > Introduce the attribute to compiler_types.h as __preserve_most. > > > > Use of this attribute results in better code generation for calls to > > very rarely called functions, such as error-reporting functions, or > > rarely executed slow paths. > > > > Beware that the attribute conflicts with instrumentation calls inserted > > on function entry which do not use __preserve_most themselves. Notably, > > function tracing which assumes the normal C calling convention for the > > given architecture. Where the attribute is supported, __preserve_most > > will imply notrace. It is recommended to restrict use of the attribute > > to functions that should or already disable tracing. > > > > Note: The additional preprocessor check against architecture should not > > be necessary if __has_attribute() only returns true where supported; > > also see https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1908. But until > > __has_attribute() does the right thing, we also guard by known-supported > > architectures to avoid build warnings on other architectures. > > > > The attribute may be supported by a future GCC version (see > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110899). > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> > > Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > Should this go via -mm, the hardening tree, or something else? I'm happy > to carry it if no one else wants it? v3 of this series is already in mm-unstable, and has had some -next exposure (which was helpful in uncovering some additional issues). Therefore, I think it's appropriate that it continues in mm and Andrew picks up the latest v4 here. Your official Ack would nevertheless be much appreciated! Thanks, -- Marco
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:21:43 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > Should this go via -mm, the hardening tree, or something else? I'm happy > to carry it if no one else wants it? Please do so.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:18:38 +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > [1]: "On X86-64 and AArch64 targets, this attribute changes the calling > convention of a function. The preserve_most calling convention attempts > to make the code in the caller as unintrusive as possible. This > convention behaves identically to the C calling convention on how > arguments and return values are passed, but it uses a different set of > caller/callee-saved registers. This alleviates the burden of saving and > recovering a large register set before and after the call in the caller. > If the arguments are passed in callee-saved registers, then they will be > preserved by the callee across the call. This doesn't apply for values > returned in callee-saved registers. > > [...] Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! [1/4] compiler_types: Introduce the Clang __preserve_most function attribute https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/7a0fd5e16785 [2/4] list_debug: Introduce inline wrappers for debug checks https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/b16c42c8fde8 [3/4] list: Introduce CONFIG_LIST_HARDENED https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/aebc7b0d8d91 [4/4] hardening: Move BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION to hardening options https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/aa9f10d57056 Take care,
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index 547ea1ff806e..c523c6683789 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -106,6 +106,34 @@ static inline void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *ptr) { } #define __cold #endif +/* + * On x86-64 and arm64 targets, __preserve_most changes the calling convention + * of a function to make the code in the caller as unintrusive as possible. This + * convention behaves identically to the C calling convention on how arguments + * and return values are passed, but uses a different set of caller- and callee- + * saved registers. + * + * The purpose is to alleviates the burden of saving and recovering a large + * register set before and after the call in the caller. This is beneficial for + * rarely taken slow paths, such as error-reporting functions that may be called + * from hot paths. + * + * Note: This may conflict with instrumentation inserted on function entry which + * does not use __preserve_most or equivalent convention (if in assembly). Since + * function tracing assumes the normal C calling convention, where the attribute + * is supported, __preserve_most implies notrace. It is recommended to restrict + * use of the attribute to functions that should or already disable tracing. + * + * Optional: not supported by gcc. + * + * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#preserve-most + */ +#if __has_attribute(__preserve_most__) && (defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)) +# define __preserve_most notrace __attribute__((__preserve_most__)) +#else +# define __preserve_most +#endif + /* Builtins */ /*