diff mbox series

[bpf,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add a failure test for bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr

Message ID 20230821000235.3109245-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf,1/2] bpf: Fix a bpf_kptr_xchg() issue with local kptr | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 17 maintainers not CCed: void@manifault.com davemarchevsky@fb.com yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com sdf@google.com trix@redhat.com shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com nathan@kernel.org llvm@lists.linux.dev linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org haoluo@google.com ndesaulniers@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: spaces preferred around that '*' (ctx:WxV) WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

Yonghong Song Aug. 21, 2023, 12:02 a.m. UTC
For a bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr, if the map value kptr type and
allocated local obj type does not match, with the previous patch,
the below verifier error message will be logged:
  R2 is of type <allocated local obj type> but <map value kptr type> is expected

Without the previous patch, the test will have unexpected success.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c         | 10 ++-
 .../bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash_fail.c         | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash_fail.c

Comments

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Aug. 21, 2023, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 at 05:33, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> For a bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr, if the map value kptr type and
> allocated local obj type does not match, with the previous patch,
> the below verifier error message will be logged:
>   R2 is of type <allocated local obj type> but <map value kptr type> is expected
>
> Without the previous patch, the test will have unexpected success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
index 76f1da877f81..158616c94658 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 
 #include "local_kptr_stash.skel.h"
+#include "local_kptr_stash_fail.skel.h"
 static void test_local_kptr_stash_simple(void)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
@@ -51,10 +52,17 @@  static void test_local_kptr_stash_unstash(void)
 	local_kptr_stash__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-void test_local_kptr_stash_success(void)
+static void test_local_kptr_stash_fail(void)
+{
+	RUN_TESTS(local_kptr_stash_fail);
+}
+
+void test_local_kptr_stash(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("local_kptr_stash_simple"))
 		test_local_kptr_stash_simple();
 	if (test__start_subtest("local_kptr_stash_unstash"))
 		test_local_kptr_stash_unstash();
+	if (test__start_subtest("local_kptr_stash_fail"))
+		test_local_kptr_stash_fail();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ebb5f0208b41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
+#include "../bpf_experimental.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+struct node_data {
+	long key;
+	long data;
+	struct bpf_rb_node node;
+};
+
+struct map_value {
+	struct node_data __kptr *node;
+};
+
+struct node_data2 {
+	long key[4];
+};
+
+/* This is necessary so that LLVM generates BTF for node_data struct
+ * If it's not included, a fwd reference for node_data will be generated but
+ * no struct. Example BTF of "node" field in map_value when not included:
+ *
+ * [10] PTR '(anon)' type_id=35
+ * [34] FWD 'node_data' fwd_kind=struct
+ * [35] TYPE_TAG 'kptr_ref' type_id=34
+ */
+struct node_data *just_here_because_btf_bug;
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, struct map_value);
+	__uint(max_entries, 2);
+} some_nodes SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("R2 is of type node_data2 but node_data is expected")
+long stash_rb_nodes(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct map_value *mapval;
+	struct node_data2 *res;
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	mapval = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&some_nodes, &idx);
+	if (!mapval)
+		return 1;
+
+	res = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*res));
+	if (!res)
+		return 1;
+	res->key[0] = 40;
+
+	res = bpf_kptr_xchg(&mapval->node, res);
+	if (res)
+		bpf_obj_drop(res);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";