| Message ID | 20230816232336.164413-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 14be7c16d420a791f2f10276afaf7a76da17d911 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | riscv: dma-mapping: unify support for cache flushes | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 174e8ac0272d |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 12 this patch: 12 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:23:35AM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > For a DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL transfer, the caches have to be cleaned > first to let the device see data written by the CPU, and invalidated > after the transfer to let the CPU see data written by the device. > > riscv also invalidates the caches before the transfer, which does > not appear to serve any purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > --- > v2->v3 > * No change > > v1->v2 > * Included RB and ACKs > --- > arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > index 94614cf61cdd..fc6377a64c8d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, > ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > break; > case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL: > - ALT_CMO_OP(flush, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > + ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); The code could be simplified a lot since after this patch, the action is always "clean". Thanks > break; > default: > break; > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023, at 06:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:23:35AM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > > The code could be simplified a lot since after this patch, the action > is always "clean". > I think it's better to leave it at the elaborate version, as I still want to merge my patch series to unify this with the other architectures, and this would introduce a few compile-time conditionals in here. Arnd
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c index 94614cf61cdd..fc6377a64c8d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); break; case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL: - ALT_CMO_OP(flush, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); + ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); break; default: break;