Message ID | d9230082aefcb7bab6363c51c08598eb5ab62cfc.1693037086.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | media: i2c: rdacm2: Remove an incorrect fwnode_handle_put() call | expand |
Hi Christophe On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The commit in Fixes has removed an fwnode_handle_put() call in the error > handling path of the probe. > > Remove the same call from the remove function. > > Fixes: 1029939b3782 ("media: v4l: async: Simplify async sub-device fwnode matching") > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> > --- > /!\ This patch is highly speculative. Review with care. /!\ > > If it is correct, it is likely that other similar issue lurk in commit > 1029939b3782. I've not looked in detail and my cocci script did not > trigger on them but drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c also looks like a > similar candidate. I think the call to fwnode_handle_put(priv->sd.fwnode) in max9286_v4l2_unregister() can indeed be removed, yes! Thanks j > --- > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > index a36a709243fd..3e22df36354f 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ static void rdacm21_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dev->sd); > v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrls); > i2c_unregister_device(dev->isp); > - fwnode_handle_put(dev->sd.fwnode); > } > > static const struct of_device_id rdacm21_of_ids[] = { > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:48:10AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Hi Christophe > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > The commit in Fixes has removed an fwnode_handle_put() call in the error > > handling path of the probe. > > > > Remove the same call from the remove function. > > > > Fixes: 1029939b3782 ("media: v4l: async: Simplify async sub-device fwnode matching") > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> The subject line should read "rdacm21", not "rdacm2". with that fixed, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > > /!\ This patch is highly speculative. Review with care. /!\ > > > > If it is correct, it is likely that other similar issue lurk in commit > > 1029939b3782. I've not looked in detail and my cocci script did not > > trigger on them but drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c also looks like a > > similar candidate. > > I think the call to fwnode_handle_put(priv->sd.fwnode) in > max9286_v4l2_unregister() can indeed be removed, yes! I agree. > > --- > > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > index a36a709243fd..3e22df36354f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ static void rdacm21_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dev->sd); > > v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrls); > > i2c_unregister_device(dev->isp); > > - fwnode_handle_put(dev->sd.fwnode); > > } > > > > static const struct of_device_id rdacm21_of_ids[] = {
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 01:57:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:48:10AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Hi Christophe > > > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > The commit in Fixes has removed an fwnode_handle_put() call in the error > > > handling path of the probe. > > > > > > Remove the same call from the remove function. > > > > > > Fixes: 1029939b3782 ("media: v4l: async: Simplify async sub-device fwnode matching") > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> > > The subject line should read "rdacm21", not "rdacm2". with that fixed, > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > > > --- > > > /!\ This patch is highly speculative. Review with care. /!\ > > > > > > If it is correct, it is likely that other similar issue lurk in commit > > > 1029939b3782. I've not looked in detail and my cocci script did not > > > trigger on them but drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c also looks like a > > > similar candidate. > > > > I think the call to fwnode_handle_put(priv->sd.fwnode) in > > max9286_v4l2_unregister() can indeed be removed, yes! > > I agree. drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-mipi-csis.c also needs a fix. Christophe, do you plan to send patches for those ? If not, I can handle it. > > > --- > > > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > > index a36a709243fd..3e22df36354f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c > > > @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ static void rdacm21_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > > v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dev->sd); > > > v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrls); > > > i2c_unregister_device(dev->isp); > > > - fwnode_handle_put(dev->sd.fwnode); > > > } > > > > > > static const struct of_device_id rdacm21_of_ids[] = {
Le 28/08/2023 à 13:16, Laurent Pinchart a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 01:57:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:48:10AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: >>> Hi Christophe >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >>>> The commit in Fixes has removed an fwnode_handle_put() call in the error >>>> handling path of the probe. >>>> >>>> Remove the same call from the remove function. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 1029939b3782 ("media: v4l: async: Simplify async sub-device fwnode matching") >>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> >> >> The subject line should read "rdacm21", not "rdacm2". with that fixed, >> >> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >> >>>> --- >>>> /!\ This patch is highly speculative. Review with care. /!\ >>>> >>>> If it is correct, it is likely that other similar issue lurk in commit >>>> 1029939b3782. I've not looked in detail and my cocci script did not >>>> trigger on them but drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c also looks like a >>>> similar candidate. >>> >>> I think the call to fwnode_handle_put(priv->sd.fwnode) in >>> max9286_v4l2_unregister() can indeed be removed, yes! >> >> I agree. > > drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-mipi-csis.c also needs a fix. > > Christophe, do you plan to send patches for those ? If not, I can handle > it. I'll propose patches for both in the coming days. CJ
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c index a36a709243fd..3e22df36354f 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ static void rdacm21_remove(struct i2c_client *client) v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dev->sd); v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrls); i2c_unregister_device(dev->isp); - fwnode_handle_put(dev->sd.fwnode); } static const struct of_device_id rdacm21_of_ids[] = {
The commit in Fixes has removed an fwnode_handle_put() call in the error handling path of the probe. Remove the same call from the remove function. Fixes: 1029939b3782 ("media: v4l: async: Simplify async sub-device fwnode matching") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> --- /!\ This patch is highly speculative. Review with care. /!\ If it is correct, it is likely that other similar issue lurk in commit 1029939b3782. I've not looked in detail and my cocci script did not trigger on them but drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c also looks like a similar candidate. --- drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)