Message ID | 20230824083012.v11.2.I4baba13e220bdd24d11400c67f137c35f07f82c7@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs | expand |
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 21:03, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > As per the (somewhat recent) comment before the definition of > `__cpuidle`, the tag is like `noinstr` but also marks a function so it > can be identified by cpu_in_idle(). Let's add these markings to arm64 > cpuidle functions > > With this change we get useful backtraces like: > > NMI backtrace for cpu N skipped: idling at cpu_do_idle+0x94/0x98 > > instead of useless backtraces when dumping all processors using > nmi_cpu_backtrace(). > > NOTE: this patch won't make cpu_in_idle() work perfectly for arm64, > but it doesn't hurt and does catch some cases. Specifically an example > that wasn't caught in my testing looked like this: > > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x1f8/0x314 > gic_cpu_pm_notifier+0x40/0x78 > raw_notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0x134 > cpu_pm_notify+0x38/0x64 > cpu_pm_exit+0x20/0x2c > psci_enter_idle_state+0x48/0x70 > cpuidle_enter_state+0xb8/0x260 > cpuidle_enter+0x44/0x5c > do_idle+0x188/0x30c > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > --- > Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> -Sumit > Changes in v11: > - Updated commit message as per Stephen. > > Changes in v9: > - Added to commit message that this doesn't catch all cases. > > Changes in v8: > - "Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle" new for v8 > > arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c > index c1125753fe9b..05cfb347ec26 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > * ensure that interrupts are not masked at the PMR (because the core will > * not wake up if we block the wake up signal in the interrupt controller). > */ > -void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void) > +void __cpuidle cpu_do_idle(void) > { > struct arm_cpuidle_irq_context context; > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void) > /* > * This is our default idle handler. > */ > -void noinstr arch_cpu_idle(void) > +void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void) > { > /* > * This should do all the clock switching and wait for interrupt > -- > 2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c index c1125753fe9b..05cfb347ec26 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ * ensure that interrupts are not masked at the PMR (because the core will * not wake up if we block the wake up signal in the interrupt controller). */ -void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void) +void __cpuidle cpu_do_idle(void) { struct arm_cpuidle_irq_context context; @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void) /* * This is our default idle handler. */ -void noinstr arch_cpu_idle(void) +void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void) { /* * This should do all the clock switching and wait for interrupt