Message ID | 82ed62dd7070203701b4ca326e62862404dd5f72.1693216959.git.maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Add printf attribute to kselftest functions | expand |
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Wieczor-Retman, Maciej wrote: > The __printf() macro is used in many tools in the linux kernel to > validate the format specifiers in functions that use printf. Some > selftests use it without putting it in a macro definition and some tests > import the kselftests.h header. "Some" and yet this only converts one? Please be more precise in the wording. > Use __printf() attribute instead of the full attribute since the macro > is inside kselftests.h and the header is already imported. IMO, this would be enough: Use __printf() from kselftests.h instead of the full attribute. Was there a reason why you didn't convert mm/pkey-helpers.h one?
On 2023-08-30 at 15:22:57 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: >On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Wieczor-Retman, Maciej wrote: > >> The __printf() macro is used in many tools in the linux kernel to >> validate the format specifiers in functions that use printf. Some >> selftests use it without putting it in a macro definition and some tests >> import the kselftests.h header. > >"Some" and yet this only converts one? Please be more precise in the >wording. Okay, I'll mention them by subsystem. >> Use __printf() attribute instead of the full attribute since the macro >> is inside kselftests.h and the header is already imported. > >IMO, this would be enough: > >Use __printf() from kselftests.h instead of the full attribute. Fair enough, I'll change the paragraph to that. >Was there a reason why you didn't convert mm/pkey-helpers.h one? Sorry, must have just missed it somehow. Thank you for pointing it out.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 03:40:10PM +0200, Maciej Wieczór-Retman wrote: > On 2023-08-30 at 15:22:57 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > >On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Wieczor-Retman, Maciej wrote: > > > >> The __printf() macro is used in many tools in the linux kernel to > >> validate the format specifiers in functions that use printf. Some > >> selftests use it without putting it in a macro definition and some tests > >> import the kselftests.h header. > > > >"Some" and yet this only converts one? Please be more precise in the > >wording. > > Okay, I'll mention them by subsystem. > > >> Use __printf() attribute instead of the full attribute since the macro > >> is inside kselftests.h and the header is already imported. > > > >IMO, this would be enough: > > > >Use __printf() from kselftests.h instead of the full attribute. > > Fair enough, I'll change the paragraph to that. There are two in kvm selftests. test_assert(), a few lines down, also uses the attribute. Thanks, drew > > >Was there a reason why you didn't convert mm/pkey-helpers.h one? > > Sorry, must have just missed it somehow. Thank you for pointing it out. > > -- > Kind regards > Maciej Wieczór-Retman
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h index a6e9f215ce70..710a8a78e8ce 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline int _no_printf(const char *format, ...) { return 0; } #define pr_info(...) _no_printf(__VA_ARGS__) #endif -void print_skip(const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2))); +void __printf(1, 2) print_skip(const char *fmt, ...); #define __TEST_REQUIRE(f, fmt, ...) \ do { \ if (!(f)) \
The __printf() macro is used in many tools in the linux kernel to validate the format specifiers in functions that use printf. Some selftests use it without putting it in a macro definition and some tests import the kselftests.h header. Use __printf() attribute instead of the full attribute since the macro is inside kselftests.h and the header is already imported. Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman, Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)