Message ID | 20230901045947.32351-10-vikram.garhwal@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo | expand |
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, Vikram Garhwal wrote: > Rename iommu_dt_device_is_assigned() to iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(). > > Moving spin_lock to caller was done to prevent the concurrent access to > iommu_dt_device_is_assigned while doing add/remove/assign/deassign. Follow-up > patches in this series introduces node add/remove feature. > > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> > Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > --- > Changes from v10: > Move spin_lock before iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked() call. > Rebase the patch with latest Xen. > Changes from v9: > Make iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked() static and delete header. > Move dtdevs_lock before iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(). > Changes from v7: > Update commit message. > Add ASSERT(). > --- > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c > index 3c0322c797..a7d86a20a0 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c > @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@ fail: > return rc; > } > > -static bool iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(const struct dt_device_node *dev) > +static bool iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(const struct dt_device_node *dev) > { > bool assigned = false; > > + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&dtdevs_lock)); > + > if ( !dt_device_is_protected(dev) ) > return 0; > > - spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock); > assigned = !list_empty(&dev->domain_list); > - spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock); > > return assigned; > } > @@ -225,12 +225,16 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct domain *d, > > if ( domctl->cmd == XEN_DOMCTL_test_assign_device ) > { > - if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(dev) ) > + spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock); > + > + if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(dev) ) > { > printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "%s already assigned.\n", > dt_node_full_name(dev)); > ret = -EINVAL; > } > + > + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock); > break; > } > > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c index 3c0322c797..a7d86a20a0 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@ fail: return rc; } -static bool iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(const struct dt_device_node *dev) +static bool iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(const struct dt_device_node *dev) { bool assigned = false; + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&dtdevs_lock)); + if ( !dt_device_is_protected(dev) ) return 0; - spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock); assigned = !list_empty(&dev->domain_list); - spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock); return assigned; } @@ -225,12 +225,16 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct domain *d, if ( domctl->cmd == XEN_DOMCTL_test_assign_device ) { - if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(dev) ) + spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock); + + if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(dev) ) { printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "%s already assigned.\n", dt_node_full_name(dev)); ret = -EINVAL; } + + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock); break; }