| Message ID | 20230804225813.12493-1-robh@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | c718f36c9bc35700408ea010c0077b550248fe72 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [RESEND] arm64: dts: mediatek: Fix "status" values | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to soc/soc.git (for-next) by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:58:13 -0600 you wrote: > The defined value for "status" is "disabled", not "disable". > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > Arnd, Please take this directly I guess. I think Mediatek maintainership > needs some help. Maybe AngeloGioacchino should be co-maintainer as > that's the only response I seem to be getting. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [RESEND] arm64: dts: mediatek: Fix "status" values https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/c718f36c9bc3 You are awesome, thank you!
Il 05/08/23 00:58, Rob Herring ha scritto: > The defined value for "status" is "disabled", not "disable". > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > Arnd, Please take this directly I guess. I think Mediatek maintainership > needs some help. Maybe AngeloGioacchino should be co-maintainer as > that's the only response I seem to be getting. Sorry but I've seen this message just now as I've been on holiday in August. Thing is, the MediaTek scene is starting to see more and more code, bringing an obvious increase in the amount of reviews to be done and in the required efforts to maintain the MTK bits - and we will possibly (hopefully) see even more of that. If Matthias needs/wants a co-maintainer for MediaTek I'm here and I will be proud to become one. Cheers, Angelo > > I think for future .dts patches I will not bother splitting them up by > sub-arch because it's a pain to chase down the maintainers to apply > stuff in a timely manner. /rant > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > index e4605d23fdc8..86cedb0bf1a9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > @@ -585,11 +585,11 @@ &pwrap { > }; > > &sata { > - status = "disable"; > + status = "disabled"; > }; > > &sata_phy { > - status = "disable"; > + status = "disabled"; > }; > > &spi0 {
On 12/09/2023 14:54, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 05/08/23 00:58, Rob Herring ha scritto: >> The defined value for "status" is "disabled", not "disable". >> >> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> >> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> --- >> Arnd, Please take this directly I guess. I think Mediatek maintainership >> needs some help. Maybe AngeloGioacchino should be co-maintainer as >> that's the only response I seem to be getting. > > Sorry but I've seen this message just now as I've been on holiday in > August. > > Thing is, the MediaTek scene is starting to see more and more code, > bringing > an obvious increase in the amount of reviews to be done and in the required > efforts to maintain the MTK bits - and we will possibly (hopefully) see > even > more of that. > > If Matthias needs/wants a co-maintainer for MediaTek I'm here and I will be > proud to become one. > > Cheers, > Angelo > I started reviewing MediaTek patches for some months now, so I'm still new. From my PoV, I'm agree with Angelo when he say the amount of patch is increasing. I support Angelo if he wants to become a co-maintainer and continue to do my best to review patches. ;) >> >> I think for future .dts patches I will not bother splitting them up by >> sub-arch because it's a pain to chase down the maintainers to apply >> stuff in a timely manner. /rant >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts >> index e4605d23fdc8..86cedb0bf1a9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts >> @@ -585,11 +585,11 @@ &pwrap { >> }; >> &sata { >> - status = "disable"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> }; >> &sata_phy { >> - status = "disable"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> }; >> &spi0 { > >
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 9:10 PM Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/09/2023 14:54, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > Il 05/08/23 00:58, Rob Herring ha scritto: > >> The defined value for "status" is "disabled", not "disable". > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> > >> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > >> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > >> --- > >> Arnd, Please take this directly I guess. I think Mediatek maintainership > >> needs some help. Maybe AngeloGioacchino should be co-maintainer as > >> that's the only response I seem to be getting. > > > > Sorry but I've seen this message just now as I've been on holiday in > > August. > > > > Thing is, the MediaTek scene is starting to see more and more code, > > bringing > > an obvious increase in the amount of reviews to be done and in the required > > efforts to maintain the MTK bits - and we will possibly (hopefully) see > > even > > more of that. > > > > If Matthias needs/wants a co-maintainer for MediaTek I'm here and I will be > > proud to become one. > > > > Cheers, > > Angelo > > > > I started reviewing MediaTek patches for some months now, so I'm still > new. From my PoV, I'm agree with Angelo when he say the amount of patch > is increasing. I support Angelo if he wants to become a co-maintainer > and continue to do my best to review patches. ;) I might not have enough time to do a lot of reviews, but if help is needed for administrative tasks like queueing patches and sending pull requests, that's something I can do. ChenYu > >> > >> I think for future .dts patches I will not bother splitting them up by > >> sub-arch because it's a pain to chase down the maintainers to apply > >> stuff in a timely manner. /rant > >> > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > >> index e4605d23fdc8..86cedb0bf1a9 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts > >> @@ -585,11 +585,11 @@ &pwrap { > >> }; > >> &sata { > >> - status = "disable"; > >> + status = "disabled"; > >> }; > >> &sata_phy { > >> - status = "disable"; > >> + status = "disabled"; > >> }; > >> &spi0 { > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Alexandre >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts index e4605d23fdc8..86cedb0bf1a9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts @@ -585,11 +585,11 @@ &pwrap { }; &sata { - status = "disable"; + status = "disabled"; }; &sata_phy { - status = "disable"; + status = "disabled"; }; &spi0 {