| Message ID | 20230910072704.1359-1-shenghao-ding@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v1] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and TIAS2781 | expand |
Hi Shenghao Ding, Thanks for the patch. > Subject: [PATCH v1] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and > TIAS2781 > > Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and TIAS2781, TXNW2781 is the only one legal > ACPI ID, TIAS2781 is the widely-used ACPI ID named by our customers, so far > it is not registered. We have discussed this with them, they requested > TIAS2781 must be supported for the laptops already released to market, > their new laptops will switch to TXNW2781. > > Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@ti.com> > > --- > Changes in v1: > - Add TXNW2781 into tas2781_acpi_hda_match and move it to the top > - Redefine tas2781_generic_fixup, remove hid param > - TIAS2781 has been used by our customers, see following dstd.dsl. We > have discussed this with them, they requested TIAS2781 must be > supported for the laptops already released to market, their new > laptops will switch to TXNW2781 > Name (_HID, "TIAS2781") // _HID: Hardware ID > Name (_UID, Zero) // _UID: Unique ID > Method (_SUB, 0, NotSerialized) // _SUB: Subsystem ID > { > If ((SPID == Zero)) > { > Return ("17AA3886") > } > > If ((SPID == One)) > { > Return ("17AA3884") > } > } > - Add TXNW2781 support in comp_match_tas2781_dev_name > --- > sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > index b7e78bfcff..6dae58a8ef 100644 > --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > @@ -6770,24 +6770,35 @@ static int comp_match_cs35l41_dev_name(struct > device *dev, void *data) > return !strcmp(d + n, tmp); > } > > +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. > + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. > + * Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 > + */ > static int comp_match_tas2781_dev_name(struct device *dev, > void *data) > { > - struct scodec_dev_name *p = data; > + const char c[][10] = { "TXNW2781", "TIAS2781" }; This you should get from match_data(). See below. > const char *d = dev_name(dev); > - int n = strlen(p->bus); > + const char *bus = data; > + int n = strlen(bus), i; > char tmp[32]; > > /* check the bus name */ > - if (strncmp(d, p->bus, n)) > + if (strncmp(d, bus, n)) > return 0; > /* skip the bus number */ > if (isdigit(d[n])) > n++; > - /* the rest must be exact matching */ > - snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "-%s:00", p->hid); > > - return !strcmp(d + n, tmp); > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(c); i++) { > + /* the rest must be exact matching */ > + snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "-%s:00", c[i]); > + > + if (!strcmp(d + n, tmp)) > + return 1; > + } > + > + return 0; > } > > static void cs35l41_generic_fixup(struct hda_codec *cdc, int action, const > char *bus, @@ -6824,24 +6835,17 @@ static void cs35l41_generic_fixup(struct > hda_codec *cdc, int action, const char } > > static void tas2781_generic_fixup(struct hda_codec *cdc, int action, > - const char *bus, const char *hid) > + const char *bus) > { > struct device *dev = hda_codec_dev(cdc); > struct alc_spec *spec = cdc->spec; > - struct scodec_dev_name *rec; > int ret; > > switch (action) { > case HDA_FIXUP_ACT_PRE_PROBE: > - rec = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(*rec), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rec) > - return; > - rec->bus = bus; > - rec->hid = hid; > - rec->index = 0; > spec->comps[0].codec = cdc; > component_match_add(dev, &spec->match, > - comp_match_tas2781_dev_name, rec); > + comp_match_tas2781_dev_name, (void *)bus); > ret = component_master_add_with_match(dev, &comp_master_ops, > spec->match); > if (ret) > @@ -6888,7 +6892,7 @@ static void > alc287_fixup_legion_16ithg6_speakers(struct hda_codec *cdc, const st > static void tas2781_fixup_i2c(struct hda_codec *cdc, > const struct hda_fixup *fix, int action) { > - tas2781_generic_fixup(cdc, action, "i2c", "TIAS2781"); > + tas2781_generic_fixup(cdc, action, "i2c"); > } > > /* for alc295_fixup_hp_top_speakers */ > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c > b/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c index fb80280293..8493952305 100644 > --- a/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c > @@ -65,6 +65,16 @@ enum calib_data { > CALIB_MAX > }; > > +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. > + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. > + */ > +static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { > + {"TIAS2781", 0 }, > + {"TXNW2781", 1 }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); > + > static int tas2781_get_i2c_res(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) { > struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv = data; @@ -644,20 +654,23 @@ static > void tas2781_hda_remove(struct device *dev) static int > tas2781_hda_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *clt) { > struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv; > - const char *device_name; > - int ret; > + int ret, i; > > - if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), "TIAS2781")) > - device_name = "TIAS2781"; > - else > - return -ENODEV; > + /* Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 */ > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match); i++) Why not aviding for loop as it can be retrieved directly using i2c_get_match_data()? Update the ACPI/ID table to use pointer to the device_name as data in the table. Then, device_name = i2c_get_match_data(client); if (!device_name && strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), device_name))) return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, -ENODEV, "Device not available\n"); Cheers, Biju > +static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { > + {"TIAS2781", 0 }, > + {"TXNW2781", 1 }, > + {} > +}; > + if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id)) > + break; > + > + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match)) > + return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, -ENODEV, > + "Device not available\n"); > > tas_priv = tasdevice_kzalloc(clt); > if (!tas_priv) > return -ENOMEM; > > tas_priv->irq_info.irq = clt->irq; > - ret = tas2781_read_acpi(tas_priv, device_name); > + ret = tas2781_read_acpi(tas_priv, tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id); > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, ret, > "Platform not supported\n"); > @@ -822,12 +835,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tas2781_hda_i2c_id[] > = { > {} > }; > > -static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { > - {"TIAS2781", 0 }, > - {} > -}; > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); > - > static struct i2c_driver tas2781_hda_i2c_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "tas2781-hda", > -- > 2.34.1
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 03:27:03PM +0800, Shenghao Ding wrote: > Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and TIAS2781, TXNW2781 is the only one legal > ACPI ID, TIAS2781 is the widely-used ACPI ID named by our customers, so > far it is not registered. We have discussed this with them, they requested > TIAS2781 must be supported for the laptops already released to market, > their new laptops will switch to TXNW2781. ... > +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. > + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. > + * Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 > + */ /* * This style is only for networking. * please use one as in this example. */ ... > + const char c[][10] = { "TXNW2781", "TIAS2781" }; Can you put this to the ACPI device ID table, it will be easier to use it with some other acpi_*() APIs? That table might need a comment why it has no MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() with it. ... > + int n = strlen(bus), i; > > - if (strncmp(d, p->bus, n)) > + if (strncmp(d, bus, n)) > return 0; It means you need to use str_has_prefix(). ... > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(c); i++) { > + /* the rest must be exact matching */ > + snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "-%s:00", c[i]); > + > + if (!strcmp(d + n, tmp)) > + return 1; > + } This can be done differently. You are comparing the instance of the device to the actual id, right? We have ACPI match APIs for that. Have you tried to look at them? ... > +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. > + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. > + */ > +static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { > + {"TIAS2781", 0 }, > + {"TXNW2781", 1 }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); So, besides the style of the comment, why do you have two different data structures for the same? Can you find a common place and deduplicate it? ... > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); Ah, I see now, it's used for probing. Please, don't move it. The hid is available via device pointer. ... This patch requires much more work, and esp. be redesigned to use proper ACPI APIs.
Hi Shenghao, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tiwai-sound/for-next] [also build test WARNING on tiwai-sound/for-linus linus/master v6.6-rc1 next-20230912] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shenghao-Ding/ALSA-hda-tas2781-Support-ACPI_ID-both-TXNW2781-and-TIAS2781/20230910-153010 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910072704.1359-1-shenghao-ding%40ti.com patch subject: [PATCH v1] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and TIAS2781 config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20230912 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122358.aEcJnIUJ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122358.aEcJnIUJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122358.aEcJnIUJ-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c:665:24: warning: variable 'tas_priv' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, -ENODEV, ^~~~~~~~ sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c:656:33: note: initialize the variable 'tas_priv' to silence this warning struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv; ^ = NULL 1 warning generated. vim +/tas_priv +665 sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c 653 654 static int tas2781_hda_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *clt) 655 { 656 struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv; 657 int ret, i; 658 659 /* Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 */ 660 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match); i++) 661 if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id)) 662 break; 663 664 if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match)) > 665 return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, -ENODEV, 666 "Device not available\n"); 667 668 tas_priv = tasdevice_kzalloc(clt); 669 if (!tas_priv) 670 return -ENOMEM; 671 672 tas_priv->irq_info.irq = clt->irq; 673 ret = tas2781_read_acpi(tas_priv, tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id); 674 if (ret) 675 return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, ret, 676 "Platform not supported\n"); 677 678 ret = tasdevice_init(tas_priv); 679 if (ret) 680 goto err; 681 682 pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(tas_priv->dev, 3000); 683 pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(tas_priv->dev); 684 pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(tas_priv->dev); 685 pm_runtime_set_active(tas_priv->dev); 686 pm_runtime_get_noresume(tas_priv->dev); 687 pm_runtime_enable(tas_priv->dev); 688 689 pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(tas_priv->dev); 690 691 ret = component_add(tas_priv->dev, &tas2781_hda_comp_ops); 692 if (ret) { 693 dev_err(tas_priv->dev, "Register component failed: %d\n", ret); 694 pm_runtime_disable(tas_priv->dev); 695 goto err; 696 } 697 698 tas2781_reset(tas_priv); 699 err: 700 if (ret) 701 tas2781_hda_remove(&clt->dev); 702 return ret; 703 } 704
diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c index b7e78bfcff..6dae58a8ef 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c @@ -6770,24 +6770,35 @@ static int comp_match_cs35l41_dev_name(struct device *dev, void *data) return !strcmp(d + n, tmp); } +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. + * Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 + */ static int comp_match_tas2781_dev_name(struct device *dev, void *data) { - struct scodec_dev_name *p = data; + const char c[][10] = { "TXNW2781", "TIAS2781" }; const char *d = dev_name(dev); - int n = strlen(p->bus); + const char *bus = data; + int n = strlen(bus), i; char tmp[32]; /* check the bus name */ - if (strncmp(d, p->bus, n)) + if (strncmp(d, bus, n)) return 0; /* skip the bus number */ if (isdigit(d[n])) n++; - /* the rest must be exact matching */ - snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "-%s:00", p->hid); - return !strcmp(d + n, tmp); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(c); i++) { + /* the rest must be exact matching */ + snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "-%s:00", c[i]); + + if (!strcmp(d + n, tmp)) + return 1; + } + + return 0; } static void cs35l41_generic_fixup(struct hda_codec *cdc, int action, const char *bus, @@ -6824,24 +6835,17 @@ static void cs35l41_generic_fixup(struct hda_codec *cdc, int action, const char } static void tas2781_generic_fixup(struct hda_codec *cdc, int action, - const char *bus, const char *hid) + const char *bus) { struct device *dev = hda_codec_dev(cdc); struct alc_spec *spec = cdc->spec; - struct scodec_dev_name *rec; int ret; switch (action) { case HDA_FIXUP_ACT_PRE_PROBE: - rec = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(*rec), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!rec) - return; - rec->bus = bus; - rec->hid = hid; - rec->index = 0; spec->comps[0].codec = cdc; component_match_add(dev, &spec->match, - comp_match_tas2781_dev_name, rec); + comp_match_tas2781_dev_name, (void *)bus); ret = component_master_add_with_match(dev, &comp_master_ops, spec->match); if (ret) @@ -6888,7 +6892,7 @@ static void alc287_fixup_legion_16ithg6_speakers(struct hda_codec *cdc, const st static void tas2781_fixup_i2c(struct hda_codec *cdc, const struct hda_fixup *fix, int action) { - tas2781_generic_fixup(cdc, action, "i2c", "TIAS2781"); + tas2781_generic_fixup(cdc, action, "i2c"); } /* for alc295_fixup_hp_top_speakers */ diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c b/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c index fb80280293..8493952305 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c @@ -65,6 +65,16 @@ enum calib_data { CALIB_MAX }; +/* TIAS2781 is the unofficial ACPI id, but widely used in current devices. + * TXNW2781 is the official ACPI id, and will be used in the new devices. + */ +static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { + {"TIAS2781", 0 }, + {"TXNW2781", 1 }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); + static int tas2781_get_i2c_res(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) { struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv = data; @@ -644,20 +654,23 @@ static void tas2781_hda_remove(struct device *dev) static int tas2781_hda_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *clt) { struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv; - const char *device_name; - int ret; + int ret, i; - if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), "TIAS2781")) - device_name = "TIAS2781"; - else - return -ENODEV; + /* Check TIAS2781 or TXNW2781 */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match); i++) + if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id)) + break; + + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(tas2781_acpi_hda_match)) + return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, -ENODEV, + "Device not available\n"); tas_priv = tasdevice_kzalloc(clt); if (!tas_priv) return -ENOMEM; tas_priv->irq_info.irq = clt->irq; - ret = tas2781_read_acpi(tas_priv, device_name); + ret = tas2781_read_acpi(tas_priv, tas2781_acpi_hda_match[i].id); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(tas_priv->dev, ret, "Platform not supported\n"); @@ -822,12 +835,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tas2781_hda_i2c_id[] = { {} }; -static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { - {"TIAS2781", 0 }, - {} -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tas2781_acpi_hda_match); - static struct i2c_driver tas2781_hda_i2c_driver = { .driver = { .name = "tas2781-hda",
Support ACPI_ID both TXNW2781 and TIAS2781, TXNW2781 is the only one legal ACPI ID, TIAS2781 is the widely-used ACPI ID named by our customers, so far it is not registered. We have discussed this with them, they requested TIAS2781 must be supported for the laptops already released to market, their new laptops will switch to TXNW2781. Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@ti.com> --- Changes in v1: - Add TXNW2781 into tas2781_acpi_hda_match and move it to the top - Redefine tas2781_generic_fixup, remove hid param - TIAS2781 has been used by our customers, see following dstd.dsl. We have discussed this with them, they requested TIAS2781 must be supported for the laptops already released to market, their new laptops will switch to TXNW2781 Name (_HID, "TIAS2781") // _HID: Hardware ID Name (_UID, Zero) // _UID: Unique ID Method (_SUB, 0, NotSerialized) // _SUB: Subsystem ID { If ((SPID == Zero)) { Return ("17AA3886") } If ((SPID == One)) { Return ("17AA3884") } } - Add TXNW2781 support in comp_match_tas2781_dev_name --- sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- sound/pci/hda/tas2781_hda_i2c.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)