Message ID | 20230913163823.7880-24-james.morse@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 0bb80ecc33a8 |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 5 and now 5 |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 25 this patch: 25 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 22 lines checked |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:38:11 +0000 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote: > ACPI firmware can trigger the events to add and remove CPUs, but the > OS may not support this. > > Print a warning when this happens. > > This gives early warning on arm64 systems that don't support > CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU, as making CPUs not present has > side effects for other parts of the system. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Seem like a good idea to me. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > index 2cafea1edc24..b67616079751 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) > acpi_status status; > int ret; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { > + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); > return -ENODEV; > + } > > if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) > return -ENODEV; > @@ -462,8 +464,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { > + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported"); > return; > + } > > pr = acpi_driver_data(device); > if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids)
On 9/14/23 02:38, James Morse wrote: > ACPI firmware can trigger the events to add and remove CPUs, but the > OS may not support this. > > Print a warning when this happens. ^^^^^^^ error message > > This gives early warning on arm64 systems that don't support > CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU, as making CPUs not present has > side effects for other parts of the system. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Maybe a warning message is enough, but a error message is also fine, I think. Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > index 2cafea1edc24..b67616079751 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) > acpi_status status; > int ret; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { > + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); > return -ENODEV; > + } > > if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) > return -ENODEV; > @@ -462,8 +464,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { > + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported"); > return; > + } > > pr = acpi_driver_data(device); > if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids) Thanks, Gavin
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 2cafea1edc24..b67616079751 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) acpi_status status; int ret; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); return -ENODEV; + } if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) return -ENODEV; @@ -462,8 +464,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported"); return; + } pr = acpi_driver_data(device); if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids)
ACPI firmware can trigger the events to add and remove CPUs, but the OS may not support this. Print a warning when this happens. This gives early warning on arm64 systems that don't support CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU, as making CPUs not present has side effects for other parts of the system. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)