Message ID | 20231009141908.1767241-1-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [01/10] appletalk: remove localtalk and ppp support | expand |
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully > merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead > code paths. > > Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl() > callback that was abused for getting device addresses and is now > only used in the ieee802154 subsystem, which still uses the same trick. > > The include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h header might still be required > for building userspace programs, but I made sure that debian code > search and the netatalk upstream have no references it it, so it > should be fine to remove. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Hi! I’ve been working on a new LocalTalk interface driver for the last couple months, do you think it would be possible to at least postpone the removal of LT a bit? It is a driver for an open source device called TashTalk (https://github.com/lampmerchant/tashtalk), which runs on a PIC micro that does all the LT interfacing, and communicates back via serial to the host system. My driver is relatively simple and works very well with netatalk 2.2 (which is still maintained and still has support for AppleTalk). The driver is basically complete and trsted and I was preparing to submit a patch. Still having LocalTalk in my view has many advantages for us enthusiasts that still want to bridge old machines to the current world without modifications, for example for printing on modern printers, netbooting, sharing files and even tcp/ip. All this basically works out of the box via the driver, Linux and available userspace tools (netatalk, macipgw). The old ISA cards supported by COPS were basically unobtanium even 20 years ago, but the solution of using a PIC and a serial port is very robust and much more furure-proof. We also already have a device that can interface a modern machine directly via USB to LocalTalk. The development of the TashTalk has been also extensively discussed on thr 68KMLA forum (https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/modtashtalk-lt0-driver-for-linux.45031/) I hope the decision to remove LocalTalk can be reconsidered at least for the time being so there is a chance to submit a new, modern device making use of this stack. Many Thanks, Rodolfo Zitellini
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:49, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully >> merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead >> code paths. >> >> Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl() >> callback that was abused for getting device addresses and is now >> only used in the ieee802154 subsystem, which still uses the same trick. >> >> The include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h header might still be required >> for building userspace programs, but I made sure that debian code >> search and the netatalk upstream have no references it it, so it >> should be fine to remove. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Hi! > I’ve been working on a new LocalTalk interface driver for the last > couple months, do you think it would be possible to at least postpone > the removal of LT a bit? > > It is a driver for an open source device called TashTalk > (https://github.com/lampmerchant/tashtalk), which runs on a PIC micro > that does all the LT interfacing, and communicates back via serial to > the host system. My driver is relatively simple and works very well > with netatalk 2.2 (which is still maintained and still has support for > AppleTalk). The driver is basically complete and trsted and I was > preparing to submit a patch. > > Still having LocalTalk in my view has many advantages for us > enthusiasts that still want to bridge old machines to the current world > without modifications, for example for printing on modern printers, > netbooting, sharing files and even tcp/ip. All this basically works out > of the box via the driver, Linux and available userspace tools > (netatalk, macipgw). > > The old ISA cards supported by COPS were basically unobtanium even 20 > years ago, but the solution of using a PIC and a serial port is very > robust and much more furure-proof. We also already have a device that > can interface a modern machine directly via USB to LocalTalk. > > The development of the TashTalk has been also extensively discussed on > thr 68KMLA forum > (https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/modtashtalk-lt0-driver-for-linux.45031/) > > I hope the decision to remove LocalTalk can be reconsidered at least > for the time being so there is a chance to submit a new, modern device > making use of this stack. Nothing is decided, I'm just proposing my patch as a cleanup for now. It would be nice to still drop the ndo_do_ioctl function though, at least in some form. When your driver actually makes it into the kernel, you can find a different method of communicating the address between the socket interface and the device driver. I can see a few ways this could work out: - add a custom callback pointer to struct atalk_iface to get and set the address for phase1 probing instead of going through the ioctl - rewrite the probing logic in aarp.c more widely, and improve the userspace interface in the process by introducing a netlink interface - Move your entire driver into userspace and go to the kernel using tun/tap. This has the added benefit of avoiding a lot of the complexity of the tty line discipline code you have. Arnd
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 18:49:43 +0200 Rodolfo Zitellini <rwz@xhero.org> wrote: > Hi! > I’ve been working on a new LocalTalk interface driver for the last couple months, do you think it would be possible to at least postpone the removal of LT a bit? > > It is a driver for an open source device called TashTalk (https://github.com/lampmerchant/tashtalk), which runs on a PIC micro that does all the LT interfacing, and communicates back via serial to the host system. My driver is relatively simple and works very well with netatalk 2.2 (which is still maintained and still has support for AppleTalk). The driver is basically complete and trsted and I was preparing to submit a patch. > > Still having LocalTalk in my view has many advantages for us enthusiasts that still want to bridge old machines to the current world without modifications, for example for printing on modern printers, netbooting, sharing files and even tcp/ip. All this basically works out of the box via the driver, Linux and available userspace tools (netatalk, macipgw). > > The old ISA cards supported by COPS were basically unobtanium even 20 years ago, but the solution of using a PIC and a serial port is very robust and much more furure-proof. We also already have a device that can interface a modern machine directly via USB to LocalTalk. > > The development of the TashTalk has been also extensively discussed on thr 68KMLA forum (https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/modtashtalk-lt0-driver-for-linux.45031/) > > I hope the decision to remove LocalTalk can be reconsidered at least for the time being so there is a chance to submit a new, modern device making use of this stack. > > Many Thanks, > Rodolfo Zitellini Does it really need it to be a kernel protocol stack? What about doing it in userspace or with BPF?
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:18:59 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully > merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead > code paths. > > Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl() > callback that was abused for getting device addresses and is now > only used in the ieee802154 subsystem, which still uses the same trick. > > The include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h header might still be required > for building userspace programs, but I made sure that debian code > search and the netatalk upstream have no references it it, so it > should be fine to remove. Looks like it depends on the ipddp driver removal. Could you repost once that one is merged (~tomorrow)?
> Il giorno 9 ott 2023, alle ore 19:29, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> ha scritto: > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:49, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> >>> The last localtalk driver is gone now, and ppp support was never fully >>> merged, so clean up the appletalk code by removing the obvious dead >>> code paths. >>> >>> Notably, this removes one of the two callers of the old .ndo_do_ioctl() >>> callback that was abused for getting device addresses and is now >>> only used in the ieee802154 subsystem, which still uses the same trick. >>> >>> The include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h header might still be required >>> for building userspace programs, but I made sure that debian code >>> search and the netatalk upstream have no references it it, so it >>> should be fine to remove. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> Hi! >> I’ve been working on a new LocalTalk interface driver for the last >> couple months, do you think it would be possible to at least postpone >> the removal of LT a bit? >> >> It is a driver for an open source device called TashTalk >> (https://github.com/lampmerchant/tashtalk), which runs on a PIC micro >> that does all the LT interfacing, and communicates back via serial to >> the host system. My driver is relatively simple and works very well >> with netatalk 2.2 (which is still maintained and still has support for >> AppleTalk). The driver is basically complete and trsted and I was >> preparing to submit a patch. >> >> Still having LocalTalk in my view has many advantages for us >> enthusiasts that still want to bridge old machines to the current world >> without modifications, for example for printing on modern printers, >> netbooting, sharing files and even tcp/ip. All this basically works out >> of the box via the driver, Linux and available userspace tools >> (netatalk, macipgw). >> >> The old ISA cards supported by COPS were basically unobtanium even 20 >> years ago, but the solution of using a PIC and a serial port is very >> robust and much more furure-proof. We also already have a device that >> can interface a modern machine directly via USB to LocalTalk. >> >> The development of the TashTalk has been also extensively discussed on >> thr 68KMLA forum >> (https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/modtashtalk-lt0-driver-for-linux.45031/) >> >> I hope the decision to remove LocalTalk can be reconsidered at least >> for the time being so there is a chance to submit a new, modern device >> making use of this stack. > > Nothing is decided, I'm just proposing my patch as a cleanup > for now. It would be nice to still drop the ndo_do_ioctl function > though, at least in some form. When your driver actually makes > it into the kernel, you can find a different method of communicating > the address between the socket interface and the device driver. Yes I too think it is good to remove ndo_do_ioctl, I designed the TashTalk driver to be a drop-in replacement for COPS mostly for compatibility with netatalk 2.2. My plan was to propose it like this (so nothing else needed to be changed) and the propose some patches in the kernel part and userspace part (netatalk). > I can see a few ways this could work out: > > - add a custom callback pointer to struct atalk_iface to > get and set the address for phase1 probing instead of going > through the ioctl This was my initial thought, at least for the moment, mostly to keep netatalk happy and make sure I don’t break other stuff that makes assumptions on how the address probing worked. There are other bits I would like to improve, for example tcpdump (which parses correctly appetalk packets!) is broken in the current implementation. > - rewrite the probing logic in aarp.c more widely, and improve > the userspace interface in the process by introducing a netlink > interface This is sorta the “second step” I was planning, I think the logic for probing could be redesigned and simplified (it also does not work 100% correctly), and it could be a good chance to improve the interface with netatalk too. > - Move your entire driver into userspace and go to the kernel > using tun/tap. This has the added benefit of avoiding a lot > of the complexity of the tty line discipline code you have. We had some discussion too if to just make the lt an userspace stack, I personally like how it is currently implemented because existing code can run basically without modification. I would propose at this stage to change the TashTalk driver to remove ndo_do_ioctl and to use a custom callback, if this ok. Many thanks, Rodolfo
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, at 09:10, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >> Il giorno 9 ott 2023, alle ore 19:29, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> ha scritto: >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:49, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >> I can see a few ways this could work out: >> >> - add a custom callback pointer to struct atalk_iface to >> get and set the address for phase1 probing instead of going >> through the ioctl > > This was my initial thought, at least for the moment, mostly to keep > netatalk happy and make sure I don’t break other stuff that makes > assumptions on how the address probing worked. There are other bits I > would like to improve, for example tcpdump (which parses correctly > appetalk packets!) is broken in the current implementation. > >> - rewrite the probing logic in aarp.c more widely, and improve >> the userspace interface in the process by introducing a netlink >> interface > > This is sorta the “second step” I was planning, I think the logic for > probing could be redesigned and simplified (it also does not work 100% > correctly), and it could be a good chance to improve the interface with > netatalk too. Ok, I've adapted my patch now to not actually drop the localtalk code for now, and sent that out, I hope that works for you. Even if we go with the v1 patch that removes it all, you could just as well start with a revert of my patch when you add your driver, so in the end it shouldn't make much of a difference. >> - Move your entire driver into userspace and go to the kernel >> using tun/tap. This has the added benefit of avoiding a lot >> of the complexity of the tty line discipline code you have. > > We had some discussion too if to just make the lt an userspace stack, I > personally like how it is currently implemented because existing code > can run basically without modification. > > I would propose at this stage to change the TashTalk driver to remove > ndo_do_ioctl and to use a custom callback, if this ok. It looks like you still need a custom userspace tool to set up the uart for your new driver, so my feeling would be that having a userspace bridge to implement the localtalk/uart to ethertalk/tap driver would actually be nicer for both usability and maintenance. It's not something we need to decide now though, and is up to you in the end. Arnd
Hi Arnd, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20231009] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.6-rc5 v6.6-rc4 v6.6-rc3 v6.6-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/ieee802154-avoid-deprecated-ndo_do_ioctl-callback/20231009-222305 base: next-20231009 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009141908.1767241-1-arnd%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 01/10] appletalk: remove localtalk and ppp support config: nios2-randconfig-001-20231010 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231010/202310101724.iRnAoP3r-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231010/202310101724.iRnAoP3r-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310101724.iRnAoP3r-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c: In function 'ipddp_create': >> drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c:207:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'atrtr_get_dev'; did you mean 'to_net_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 207 | if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | to_net_dev >> drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c:207:22: warning: assignment to 'struct net_device *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 207 | if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) { | ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +207 drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 192 ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 193 /* ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 194 * Create a routing entry. We first verify that the ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 195 * record does not already exist. If it does we return -EEXIST ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 196 */ ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 197 static int ipddp_create(struct ipddp_route *new_rt) ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 198 { ce7e40c432ba84 Vlad Tsyrklevich 2017-01-09 199 struct ipddp_route *rt = kzalloc(sizeof(*rt), GFP_KERNEL); ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 200 ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 201 if (rt == NULL) ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 202 return -ENOMEM; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 203 ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 204 rt->ip = new_rt->ip; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 205 rt->at = new_rt->at; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 206 rt->next = NULL; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @207 if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) { ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 208 kfree(rt); ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 209 return -ENETUNREACH; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 210 } ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 211 5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 212 spin_lock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock); 5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 213 if (__ipddp_find_route(rt)) { 5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 214 spin_unlock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock); ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 215 kfree(rt); ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 216 return -EEXIST; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 217 } ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 218 ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 219 rt->next = ipddp_route_list; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 220 ipddp_route_list = rt; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 221 5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 222 spin_unlock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock); 5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 223 ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 224 return 0; ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 225 } ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 226
> Il giorno 10 ott 2023, alle ore 10:15, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> ha scritto: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, at 09:10, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >>> Il giorno 9 ott 2023, alle ore 19:29, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> ha scritto: >>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:49, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: >>> I can see a few ways this could work out: >>> >>> - add a custom callback pointer to struct atalk_iface to >>> get and set the address for phase1 probing instead of going >>> through the ioctl >> >> This was my initial thought, at least for the moment, mostly to keep >> netatalk happy and make sure I don’t break other stuff that makes >> assumptions on how the address probing worked. There are other bits I >> would like to improve, for example tcpdump (which parses correctly >> appetalk packets!) is broken in the current implementation. >> >>> - rewrite the probing logic in aarp.c more widely, and improve >>> the userspace interface in the process by introducing a netlink >>> interface >> >> This is sorta the “second step” I was planning, I think the logic for >> probing could be redesigned and simplified (it also does not work 100% >> correctly), and it could be a good chance to improve the interface with >> netatalk too. > > Ok, I've adapted my patch now to not actually drop the > localtalk code for now, and sent that out, I hope that works > for you. Even if we go with the v1 patch that removes it all, > you could just as well start with a revert of my patch when > you add your driver, so in the end it shouldn't make much > of a difference. Thank you very much! I will try to make my patch ready to be submitted soon, and I will add the proper reverts if needed. >>> - Move your entire driver into userspace and go to the kernel >>> using tun/tap. This has the added benefit of avoiding a lot >>> of the complexity of the tty line discipline code you have. >> >> We had some discussion too if to just make the lt an userspace stack, I >> personally like how it is currently implemented because existing code >> can run basically without modification. >> >> I would propose at this stage to change the TashTalk driver to remove >> ndo_do_ioctl and to use a custom callback, if this ok. > > It looks like you still need a custom userspace tool to set up > the uart for your new driver, so my feeling would be that having a > userspace bridge to implement the localtalk/uart to ethertalk/tap > driver would actually be nicer for both usability and maintenance. > > It's not something we need to decide now though, and is up to > you in the end. I will experiment with this too, as it will require a bit of work to morph localtalk packets to ethertalk/aarp ones, and the code in the kernel has some specialized bits for localtalk here and there. In any case, many thanks! Rodolfo
Hi Arnd,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20231009]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.6-rc5 v6.6-rc4 v6.6-rc3 v6.6-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/ieee802154-avoid-deprecated-ndo_do_ioctl-callback/20231009-222305
base: next-20231009
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009141908.1767241-1-arnd%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH 01/10] appletalk: remove localtalk and ppp support
config: x86_64-randconfig-002-20231011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231011/202310111736.4mh6Cf5C-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231011/202310111736.4mh6Cf5C-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310111736.4mh6Cf5C-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c: In function 'ipddp_create':
drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c:207:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'atrtr_get_dev'; did you mean 'to_net_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
to_net_dev
>> drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c:207:22: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) {
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +207 drivers/net/appletalk/ipddp.c
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 192
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 193 /*
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 194 * Create a routing entry. We first verify that the
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 195 * record does not already exist. If it does we return -EEXIST
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 196 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 197 static int ipddp_create(struct ipddp_route *new_rt)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 198 {
ce7e40c432ba84 Vlad Tsyrklevich 2017-01-09 199 struct ipddp_route *rt = kzalloc(sizeof(*rt), GFP_KERNEL);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 200
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 201 if (rt == NULL)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 202 return -ENOMEM;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 203
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 204 rt->ip = new_rt->ip;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 205 rt->at = new_rt->at;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 206 rt->next = NULL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @207 if ((rt->dev = atrtr_get_dev(&rt->at)) == NULL) {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 208 kfree(rt);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 209 return -ENETUNREACH;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 210 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 211
5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 212 spin_lock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock);
5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 213 if (__ipddp_find_route(rt)) {
5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 214 spin_unlock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 215 kfree(rt);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 216 return -EEXIST;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 217 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 218
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 219 rt->next = ipddp_route_list;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 220 ipddp_route_list = rt;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 221
5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 222 spin_unlock_bh(&ipddp_route_lock);
5615968a708451 David S. Miller 2009-05-27 223
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 224 return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 225 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 226
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index 89ab9efe522c3..e11476296e253 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ #include <linux/bpf_trace.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/ieee802154.h> -#include <linux/if_ltalk.h> #include <uapi/linux/if_fddi.h> #include <uapi/linux/if_hippi.h> #include <uapi/linux/if_fc.h> @@ -3059,8 +3058,6 @@ static unsigned char tun_get_addr_len(unsigned short type) return ROSE_ADDR_LEN; case ARPHRD_NETROM: return AX25_ADDR_LEN; - case ARPHRD_LOCALTLK: - return LTALK_ALEN; default: return 0; } diff --git a/include/linux/atalk.h b/include/linux/atalk.h index a55bfc6567d01..2896f2ac9568e 100644 --- a/include/linux/atalk.h +++ b/include/linux/atalk.h @@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ static inline struct atalk_iface *atalk_find_dev(struct net_device *dev) #endif extern struct atalk_addr *atalk_find_dev_addr(struct net_device *dev); -extern struct net_device *atrtr_get_dev(struct atalk_addr *sa); extern int aarp_send_ddp(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, struct atalk_addr *sa, void *hwaddr); diff --git a/include/linux/if_ltalk.h b/include/linux/if_ltalk.h deleted file mode 100644 index 4cc1c0b778700..0000000000000 --- a/include/linux/if_ltalk.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ -#ifndef __LINUX_LTALK_H -#define __LINUX_LTALK_H - -#include <uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h> - -extern struct net_device *alloc_ltalkdev(int sizeof_priv); -#endif diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h deleted file mode 100644 index fa61e776f598d..0000000000000 --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_ltalk.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,10 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ -#ifndef _UAPI__LINUX_LTALK_H -#define _UAPI__LINUX_LTALK_H - -#define LTALK_HLEN 1 -#define LTALK_MTU 600 -#define LTALK_ALEN 1 - - -#endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_LTALK_H */ diff --git a/net/appletalk/Makefile b/net/appletalk/Makefile index 33164d972d379..152312a151800 100644 --- a/net/appletalk/Makefile +++ b/net/appletalk/Makefile @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ATALK) += appletalk.o -appletalk-y := aarp.o ddp.o dev.o +appletalk-y := aarp.o ddp.o appletalk-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += atalk_proc.o appletalk-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl_net_atalk.o diff --git a/net/appletalk/aarp.c b/net/appletalk/aarp.c index 9fa0b246902be..dfcd9f46cb3a6 100644 --- a/net/appletalk/aarp.c +++ b/net/appletalk/aarp.c @@ -432,49 +432,18 @@ static struct atalk_addr *__aarp_proxy_find(struct net_device *dev, return a ? sa : NULL; } -/* - * Probe a Phase 1 device or a device that requires its Net:Node to - * be set via an ioctl. - */ -static void aarp_send_probe_phase1(struct atalk_iface *iface) -{ - struct ifreq atreq; - struct sockaddr_at *sa = (struct sockaddr_at *)&atreq.ifr_addr; - const struct net_device_ops *ops = iface->dev->netdev_ops; - - sa->sat_addr.s_node = iface->address.s_node; - sa->sat_addr.s_net = ntohs(iface->address.s_net); - - /* We pass the Net:Node to the drivers/cards by a Device ioctl. */ - if (!(ops->ndo_do_ioctl(iface->dev, &atreq, SIOCSIFADDR))) { - ops->ndo_do_ioctl(iface->dev, &atreq, SIOCGIFADDR); - if (iface->address.s_net != htons(sa->sat_addr.s_net) || - iface->address.s_node != sa->sat_addr.s_node) - iface->status |= ATIF_PROBE_FAIL; - - iface->address.s_net = htons(sa->sat_addr.s_net); - iface->address.s_node = sa->sat_addr.s_node; - } -} - - void aarp_probe_network(struct atalk_iface *atif) { - if (atif->dev->type == ARPHRD_LOCALTLK || - atif->dev->type == ARPHRD_PPP) - aarp_send_probe_phase1(atif); - else { - unsigned int count; + unsigned int count; - for (count = 0; count < AARP_RETRANSMIT_LIMIT; count++) { - aarp_send_probe(atif->dev, &atif->address); + for (count = 0; count < AARP_RETRANSMIT_LIMIT; count++) { + aarp_send_probe(atif->dev, &atif->address); - /* Defer 1/10th */ - msleep(100); + /* Defer 1/10th */ + msleep(100); - if (atif->status & ATIF_PROBE_FAIL) - break; - } + if (atif->status & ATIF_PROBE_FAIL) + break; } } @@ -484,14 +453,6 @@ int aarp_proxy_probe_network(struct atalk_iface *atif, struct atalk_addr *sa) struct aarp_entry *entry; unsigned int count; - /* - * we don't currently support LocalTalk or PPP for proxy AARP; - * if someone wants to try and add it, have fun - */ - if (atif->dev->type == ARPHRD_LOCALTLK || - atif->dev->type == ARPHRD_PPP) - goto out; - /* * create a new AARP entry with the flags set to be published -- * we need this one to hang around even if it's in use @@ -549,51 +510,6 @@ int aarp_send_ddp(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, skb_reset_network_header(skb); - /* Check for LocalTalk first */ - if (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOCALTLK) { - struct atalk_addr *at = atalk_find_dev_addr(dev); - struct ddpehdr *ddp = (struct ddpehdr *)skb->data; - int ft = 2; - - /* - * Compressible ? - * - * IFF: src_net == dest_net == device_net - * (zero matches anything) - */ - - if ((!ddp->deh_snet || at->s_net == ddp->deh_snet) && - (!ddp->deh_dnet || at->s_net == ddp->deh_dnet)) { - skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*ddp) - 4); - - /* - * The upper two remaining bytes are the port - * numbers we just happen to need. Now put the - * length in the lower two. - */ - *((__be16 *)skb->data) = htons(skb->len); - ft = 1; - } - /* - * Nice and easy. No AARP type protocols occur here so we can - * just shovel it out with a 3 byte LLAP header - */ - - skb_push(skb, 3); - skb->data[0] = sa->s_node; - skb->data[1] = at->s_node; - skb->data[2] = ft; - skb->dev = dev; - goto sendit; - } - - /* On a PPP link we neither compress nor aarp. */ - if (dev->type == ARPHRD_PPP) { - skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_PPPTALK); - skb->dev = dev; - goto sendit; - } - /* Non ELAP we cannot do. */ if (dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER) goto free_it; @@ -659,22 +575,12 @@ int aarp_send_ddp(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, out_unlock: write_unlock_bh(&aarp_lock); - /* Tell the ddp layer we have taken over for this frame. */ - goto sent; - -sendit: - if (skb->sk) - skb->priority = READ_ONCE(skb->sk->sk_priority); - if (dev_queue_xmit(skb)) - goto drop; sent: return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS; free_it: kfree_skb(skb); -drop: return NET_XMIT_DROP; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(aarp_send_ddp); /* * An entry in the aarp unresolved queue has become resolved. Send diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c index 8978fb6212ffb..9fe344b08dc8b 100644 --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static struct atalk_route *atrtr_find(struct atalk_addr *target) * Given an AppleTalk network, find the device to use. This can be * a simple lookup. */ -struct net_device *atrtr_get_dev(struct atalk_addr *sa) +static struct net_device *atrtr_get_dev(struct atalk_addr *sa) { struct atalk_route *atr = atrtr_find(sa); return atr ? atr->dev : NULL; @@ -683,9 +683,7 @@ static int atif_ioctl(int cmd, void __user *arg) if (sa->sat_family != AF_APPLETALK) return -EINVAL; if (dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER && - dev->type != ARPHRD_LOOPBACK && - dev->type != ARPHRD_LOCALTLK && - dev->type != ARPHRD_PPP) + dev->type != ARPHRD_LOOPBACK) return -EPROTONOSUPPORT; nr = (struct atalk_netrange *)&sa->sat_zero[0]; @@ -1327,18 +1325,8 @@ static int atalk_route_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, * Don't route multicast, etc., packets, or packets sent to "this * network" */ - if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST || !ddp->deh_dnet) { - /* - * FIXME: - * - * Can it ever happen that a packet is from a PPP iface and - * needs to be broadcast onto the default network? - */ - if (dev->type == ARPHRD_PPP) - printk(KERN_DEBUG "AppleTalk: didn't forward broadcast " - "packet received from PPP iface\n"); + if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST || !ddp->deh_dnet) goto free_it; - } ta.s_net = ddp->deh_dnet; ta.s_node = ddp->deh_dnode; @@ -1508,64 +1496,6 @@ static int atalk_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, } -/* - * Receive a LocalTalk frame. We make some demands on the caller here. - * Caller must provide enough headroom on the packet to pull the short - * header and append a long one. - */ -static int ltalk_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, - struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_dev) -{ - if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), &init_net)) - goto freeit; - - /* Expand any short form frames */ - if (skb_mac_header(skb)[2] == 1) { - struct ddpehdr *ddp; - /* Find our address */ - struct atalk_addr *ap = atalk_find_dev_addr(dev); - - if (!ap || skb->len < sizeof(__be16) || skb->len > 1023) - goto freeit; - - /* Don't mangle buffer if shared */ - if (!(skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))) - return 0; - - /* - * The push leaves us with a ddephdr not an shdr, and - * handily the port bytes in the right place preset. - */ - ddp = skb_push(skb, sizeof(*ddp) - 4); - - /* Now fill in the long header */ - - /* - * These two first. The mac overlays the new source/dest - * network information so we MUST copy these before - * we write the network numbers ! - */ - - ddp->deh_dnode = skb_mac_header(skb)[0]; /* From physical header */ - ddp->deh_snode = skb_mac_header(skb)[1]; /* From physical header */ - - ddp->deh_dnet = ap->s_net; /* Network number */ - ddp->deh_snet = ap->s_net; - ddp->deh_sum = 0; /* No checksum */ - /* - * Not sure about this bit... - */ - /* Non routable, so force a drop if we slip up later */ - ddp->deh_len_hops = htons(skb->len + (DDP_MAXHOPS << 10)); - } - skb_reset_transport_header(skb); - - return atalk_rcv(skb, dev, pt, orig_dev); -freeit: - kfree_skb(skb); - return 0; -} - static int atalk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; @@ -1935,22 +1865,8 @@ static struct notifier_block ddp_notifier = { .notifier_call = ddp_device_event, }; -static struct packet_type ltalk_packet_type __read_mostly = { - .type = cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_LOCALTALK), - .func = ltalk_rcv, -}; - -static struct packet_type ppptalk_packet_type __read_mostly = { - .type = cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_PPPTALK), - .func = atalk_rcv, -}; - static unsigned char ddp_snap_id[] = { 0x08, 0x00, 0x07, 0x80, 0x9B }; -/* Export symbols for use by drivers when AppleTalk is a module */ -EXPORT_SYMBOL(atrtr_get_dev); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(atalk_find_dev_addr); - /* Called by proto.c on kernel start up */ static int __init atalk_init(void) { @@ -1971,9 +1887,6 @@ static int __init atalk_init(void) goto out_sock; } - dev_add_pack(<alk_packet_type); - dev_add_pack(&ppptalk_packet_type); - rc = register_netdevice_notifier(&ddp_notifier); if (rc) goto out_snap; @@ -1998,8 +1911,6 @@ static int __init atalk_init(void) out_dev: unregister_netdevice_notifier(&ddp_notifier); out_snap: - dev_remove_pack(&ppptalk_packet_type); - dev_remove_pack(<alk_packet_type); unregister_snap_client(ddp_dl); out_sock: sock_unregister(PF_APPLETALK); @@ -2026,8 +1937,6 @@ static void __exit atalk_exit(void) atalk_proc_exit(); aarp_cleanup_module(); /* General aarp clean-up. */ unregister_netdevice_notifier(&ddp_notifier); - dev_remove_pack(<alk_packet_type); - dev_remove_pack(&ppptalk_packet_type); unregister_snap_client(ddp_dl); sock_unregister(PF_APPLETALK); proto_unregister(&ddp_proto); diff --git a/net/appletalk/dev.c b/net/appletalk/dev.c deleted file mode 100644 index 284c8e585533a..0000000000000 --- a/net/appletalk/dev.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -/* - * Moved here from drivers/net/net_init.c, which is: - * Written 1993,1994,1995 by Donald Becker. - */ - -#include <linux/errno.h> -#include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/netdevice.h> -#include <linux/if_arp.h> -#include <linux/if_ltalk.h> - -static void ltalk_setup(struct net_device *dev) -{ - /* Fill in the fields of the device structure with localtalk-generic values. */ - - dev->type = ARPHRD_LOCALTLK; - dev->hard_header_len = LTALK_HLEN; - dev->mtu = LTALK_MTU; - dev->addr_len = LTALK_ALEN; - dev->tx_queue_len = 10; - - dev->broadcast[0] = 0xFF; - - dev->flags = IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_MULTICAST|IFF_NOARP; -} - -/** - * alloc_ltalkdev - Allocates and sets up an localtalk device - * @sizeof_priv: Size of additional driver-private structure to be allocated - * for this localtalk device - * - * Fill in the fields of the device structure with localtalk-generic - * values. Basically does everything except registering the device. - * - * Constructs a new net device, complete with a private data area of - * size @sizeof_priv. A 32-byte (not bit) alignment is enforced for - * this private data area. - */ - -struct net_device *alloc_ltalkdev(int sizeof_priv) -{ - return alloc_netdev(sizeof_priv, "lt%d", NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, - ltalk_setup); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_ltalkdev);