diff mbox series

crypto: Limit MODULE_SIG_KEY_TYPE_ECDSA to SHA384 or SHA512

Message ID 20231010212755.64744-1-dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Herbert Xu
Headers show
Series crypto: Limit MODULE_SIG_KEY_TYPE_ECDSA to SHA384 or SHA512 | expand

Commit Message

Dimitri John Ledkov Oct. 10, 2023, 9:27 p.m. UTC
NIST FIPS 186-5 states that it is recommended that the security
strength associated with the bit length of n and the security strength
of the hash function be the same, or higher upon agreement. Given NIST
P384 curve is used, force using either SHA384 or SHA512.

Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
---
 certs/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Luis Chamberlain Oct. 10, 2023, 10:38 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:27:55PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> NIST FIPS 186-5 states that it is recommended that the security
> strength associated with the bit length of n and the security strength
> of the hash function be the same, or higher upon agreement. Given NIST
> P384 curve is used, force using either SHA384 or SHA512.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
> ---

I'd imagine this could go through crypto tree, as folks more in tune
with these requirements would be more aligned with what we need.

  Luis
Herbert Xu Oct. 20, 2023, 5:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:27:55PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> NIST FIPS 186-5 states that it is recommended that the security
> strength associated with the bit length of n and the security strength
> of the hash function be the same, or higher upon agreement. Given NIST
> P384 curve is used, force using either SHA384 or SHA512.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
> ---
>  certs/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
Herbert Xu Oct. 20, 2023, 5:56 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:27:55PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> NIST FIPS 186-5 states that it is recommended that the security
> strength associated with the bit length of n and the security strength
> of the hash function be the same, or higher upon agreement. Given NIST
> P384 curve is used, force using either SHA384 or SHA512.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
> ---
>  certs/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/certs/Kconfig b/certs/Kconfig
index 1f109b0708..84582de66b 100644
--- a/certs/Kconfig
+++ b/certs/Kconfig
@@ -30,9 +30,11 @@  config MODULE_SIG_KEY_TYPE_RSA
 config MODULE_SIG_KEY_TYPE_ECDSA
 	bool "ECDSA"
 	select CRYPTO_ECDSA
+	depends on MODULE_SIG_SHA384 || MODULE_SIG_SHA512
 	help
-	 Use an elliptic curve key (NIST P384) for module signing. Consider
-	 using a strong hash like sha256 or sha384 for hashing modules.
+	 Use an elliptic curve key (NIST P384) for module signing. Use
+	 a strong hash of same or higher bit length, i.e. sha384 or
+	 sha512 for hashing modules.
 
 	 Note: Remove all ECDSA signing keys, e.g. certs/signing_key.pem,
 	 when falling back to building Linux 5.14 and older kernels.