Message ID | 20231012152108.101270-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | PM: domains: Drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() | expand |
On 10/12/23 17:21, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level > dance"), there is no longer any users of the > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback. > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the > callback too. > > Rafael, I would like to take this through my pmdomain tree, unless you see a > problem with it ofcourse, hence I need your ack on the last patch in the series. > > Kind regards > Uffe Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Konrad
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level > dance"), there is no longer any users of the > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback. > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the > callback too. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec Best regards,
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level > > dance"), there is no longer any users of the > > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still > > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback. > > > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the > > callback too. > > > > [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback > commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec Thierry, I was planning to queue up the complete series through my pmdomain tree, my apologies if that wasn't clear. I want to get rid of the actual genpd API and the genpd callback altogether (patch5). Would it be possible for you to drop the above patch from your tree and provide an ack instead? Kind regards Uffe
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 11:57, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level > > > dance"), there is no longer any users of the > > > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still > > > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback. > > > > > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the > > > callback too. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback > > commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec > > Thierry, I was planning to queue up the complete series through my > pmdomain tree, my apologies if that wasn't clear. I want to get rid of > the actual genpd API and the genpd callback altogether (patch5). > > Would it be possible for you to drop the above patch from your tree > and provide an ack instead? I just noticed that the above went has also been pulled into the soc tree from your pull-request. So nevermind, I can do the final cleanup later on. Kind regards Uffe