Message ID | 20231016020314.1269636-1-haowenchao2@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | SCSI: Fix issues between removing device and error handle | expand |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com> wrote: > > I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error > injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and > error handler happened together. > > These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped > when calling shost_for_each_device(). Friendly ping... > > Three issues are found: > 1. statistic info printed at beginning of scsi_error_handler is wrong > 2. device reset is not triggered > 3. IO requeued to request_queue would be hang after error handle > > V3: > - Update patch description > - Update comments of functions added > > V2: > - Fix IO hang by run all devices' queue after error handler > - Do not modify shost_for_each_device() directly but add a new > helper to iterate devices but do not skip devices in removing > > Wenchao Hao (4): > scsi: core: Add new helper to iterate all devices of host > scsi: scsi_error: Fix wrong statistic when print error info > scsi: scsi_error: Fix device reset is not triggered > scsi: scsi_core: Fix IO hang when device removing > > drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 2 +- > include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++--- > 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.32.0 >
On 10/17/23 10:00, Wenchao Hao wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error >> injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and >> error handler happened together. >> >> These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped >> when calling shost_for_each_device(). > > Friendly ping... The patch series was posted on October 15, 7 PM PDT and the ping has been posted on October 17, 10 AM PDT. That's less than two days after the patch series was posted. Isn't that way too soon to post a "ping"? Thanks, Bart.
On 2023/10/18 5:41, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 10/17/23 10:00, Wenchao Hao wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >>> I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error >>> injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and >>> error handler happened together. >>> >>> These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped >>> when calling shost_for_each_device(). >> >> Friendly ping... > > The patch series was posted on October 15, 7 PM PDT and the ping has > been posted on October 17, 10 AM PDT. That's less than two days after > the patch series was posted. Isn't that way too soon to post a "ping"? > The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I ping soon after repost. > Thanks, > > Bart. > >
On 10/17/23 18:37, Wenchao Hao wrote: > The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I > ping soon after repost. Since a repost counts as a ping, I think posting a ping soon after reposting is considered aggressive. Bart.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:51 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote: > > On 10/17/23 18:37, Wenchao Hao wrote: > > The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I > > ping soon after repost. > > Since a repost counts as a ping, I think posting a ping soon after > reposting is considered aggressive. > I didn't mean that, then how long is appropriate to post a ping? Thanks. > Bart.
On 10/18/23 07:40, Wenchao Hao wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:51 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote: >> >> On 10/17/23 18:37, Wenchao Hao wrote: >>> The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I >>> ping soon after repost. >> >> Since a repost counts as a ping, I think posting a ping soon after >> reposting is considered aggressive. > > I didn't mean that, then how long is appropriate to post a ping? It depends on how busy the reviewers are. I wait at least one week before sending out a ping or reposting a patch series. Bart.
On 10/16/23 10:03 AM, Wenchao Hao wrote: > I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error > injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and > error handler happened together. > > These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped > when calling shost_for_each_device(). > Friendly ping... > Three issues are found: > 1. statistic info printed at beginning of scsi_error_handler is wrong > 2. device reset is not triggered > 3. IO requeued to request_queue would be hang after error handle > > V3: > - Update patch description > - Update comments of functions added > > V2: > - Fix IO hang by run all devices' queue after error handler > - Do not modify shost_for_each_device() directly but add a new > helper to iterate devices but do not skip devices in removing > > Wenchao Hao (4): > scsi: core: Add new helper to iterate all devices of host > scsi: scsi_error: Fix wrong statistic when print error info > scsi: scsi_error: Fix device reset is not triggered > scsi: scsi_core: Fix IO hang when device removing > > drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 2 +- > include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++--- > 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >