Message ID | 31b27c8e54f131b7eabcbd78573f0b5bfe380d8c.1698184674.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [net,v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr() | expand |
On 24 Oct 2023, at 17:58, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should > be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of > the output, excluding the trailing NULL. > > Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses") > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > --- > v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject > Add net in [PATCH...] > --- Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Ben
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:58:20PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should > be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of > the output, excluding the trailing NULL. > > Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses") > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Hi Christophe - Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend to include them in some other tree? > --- > v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject > Add net in [PATCH...] > --- > net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c > index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644 > --- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c > +++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c > @@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags) > } > > if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf), > - ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf)) > + ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf)) > return NULL; > > - if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf)) > + if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf)) > return NULL; > > return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags); > -- > 2.32.0 >
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote: > Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend > to include them in some other tree? FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer understood tree designations :(
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote: > > Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend > > to include them in some other tree? > > FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer > understood tree designations :( I accidentally markedt his NFS patch as net on Oct 11 as well. :/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/356fb42c-9cf1-45cd-9233-ac845c507fb7@moroto.mountain/ regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c @@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags) } if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf), - ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf)) + ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf)) return NULL; - if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf)) + if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf)) return NULL; return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags);
The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of the output, excluding the trailing NULL. Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> --- v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject Add net in [PATCH...] --- net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)