Message ID | 20231026013231.53271-1-michael.chan@broadcom.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 9cfe8cf5027bf4354e752d40c784219225f74004 |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] bnxt_en: Fix 2 stray ethtool -S counters | expand |
On 26.10.2023 03:32, Michael Chan wrote: > The recent firmware interface change has added 2 counters in struct > rx_port_stats_ext. This caused 2 stray ethtool counters to be > displayed. > > Since new counters are added from time to time, fix it so that the > ethtool logic will only display up to the maximum known counters. > These 2 counters are not used by production firmware yet. > > Fixes: 754fbf604ff6 ("bnxt_en: Update firmware interface to 1.10.2.171") If this is a fix than the target should be "net" not "net-next". > Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> > Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> > --- > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 28 +++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c > index 53442aaabe5e..f3f384773ac0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c > @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int bnxt_get_num_ring_stats(struct bnxt *bp) > static int bnxt_get_num_stats(struct bnxt *bp) > { > int num_stats = bnxt_get_num_ring_stats(bp); > + int len; > > num_stats += BNXT_NUM_RING_ERR_STATS; > > @@ -542,8 +543,12 @@ static int bnxt_get_num_stats(struct bnxt *bp) > num_stats += BNXT_NUM_PORT_STATS; > > if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { > - num_stats += bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size + > - bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; > + len = min_t(int, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); You don't need "len" var. Why not just: num_stats += min_t(int, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + num_stats += len; > + len = min_t(int, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + num_stats += len; > if (bp->pri2cos_valid) > num_stats += BNXT_NUM_STATS_PRI; > } > @@ -653,12 +658,17 @@ static void bnxt_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev, > if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { > u64 *rx_port_stats_ext = bp->rx_port_stats_ext.sw_stats; > u64 *tx_port_stats_ext = bp->tx_port_stats_ext.sw_stats; > + u32 len; > > - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size; i++, j++) { > + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++, j++) { > buf[j] = *(rx_port_stats_ext + > bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr[i].offset); > } > - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; i++, j++) { > + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++, j++) { > buf[j] = *(tx_port_stats_ext + > bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr[i].offset); > } > @@ -757,11 +767,17 @@ static void bnxt_get_strings(struct net_device *dev, u32 stringset, u8 *buf) > } > } > if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { > - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size; i++) { > + u32 len; > + > + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > strcpy(buf, bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr[i].string); > buf += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; > } > - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; i++) { > + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, > + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > strcpy(buf, > bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr[i].string); > buf += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:36:37 +0200 Wojciech Drewek wrote: > > Fixes: 754fbf604ff6 ("bnxt_en: Update firmware interface to 1.10.2.171") > > If this is a fix than the target should be "net" not "net-next". The commit in question hasn't reached net yet, this is the second time you're going this incorrect feedback: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231023093256.0dd8f145@kernel.org/ > You don't need "len" var. > Why not just: > num_stats += min_t(int, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, > ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); I think it's needed to make sure lines don't go over 80 chars.
On 26.10.2023 16:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:36:37 +0200 Wojciech Drewek wrote: >>> Fixes: 754fbf604ff6 ("bnxt_en: Update firmware interface to 1.10.2.171") >> >> If this is a fix than the target should be "net" not "net-next". > > The commit in question hasn't reached net yet, this is the second time > you're going this incorrect feedback: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231023093256.0dd8f145@kernel.org/ Sorry, I somehow missed your comment. > >> You don't need "len" var. >> Why not just: >> num_stats += min_t(int, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, >> ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); > > I think it's needed to make sure lines don't go over 80 chars. Makes sense
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:32:31 -0700 you wrote: > The recent firmware interface change has added 2 counters in struct > rx_port_stats_ext. This caused 2 stray ethtool counters to be > displayed. > > Since new counters are added from time to time, fix it so that the > ethtool logic will only display up to the maximum known counters. > These 2 counters are not used by production firmware yet. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] bnxt_en: Fix 2 stray ethtool -S counters https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9cfe8cf5027b You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c index 53442aaabe5e..f3f384773ac0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int bnxt_get_num_ring_stats(struct bnxt *bp) static int bnxt_get_num_stats(struct bnxt *bp) { int num_stats = bnxt_get_num_ring_stats(bp); + int len; num_stats += BNXT_NUM_RING_ERR_STATS; @@ -542,8 +543,12 @@ static int bnxt_get_num_stats(struct bnxt *bp) num_stats += BNXT_NUM_PORT_STATS; if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { - num_stats += bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size + - bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; + len = min_t(int, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); + num_stats += len; + len = min_t(int, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); + num_stats += len; if (bp->pri2cos_valid) num_stats += BNXT_NUM_STATS_PRI; } @@ -653,12 +658,17 @@ static void bnxt_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev, if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { u64 *rx_port_stats_ext = bp->rx_port_stats_ext.sw_stats; u64 *tx_port_stats_ext = bp->tx_port_stats_ext.sw_stats; + u32 len; - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size; i++, j++) { + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); + for (i = 0; i < len; i++, j++) { buf[j] = *(rx_port_stats_ext + bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr[i].offset); } - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; i++, j++) { + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); + for (i = 0; i < len; i++, j++) { buf[j] = *(tx_port_stats_ext + bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr[i].offset); } @@ -757,11 +767,17 @@ static void bnxt_get_strings(struct net_device *dev, u32 stringset, u8 *buf) } } if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS_EXT) { - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size; i++) { + u32 len; + + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_rx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr)); + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { strcpy(buf, bnxt_port_stats_ext_arr[i].string); buf += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; } - for (i = 0; i < bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size; i++) { + len = min_t(u32, bp->fw_tx_stats_ext_size, + ARRAY_SIZE(bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr)); + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { strcpy(buf, bnxt_tx_port_stats_ext_arr[i].string); buf += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;