Message ID | 1698274250-653-1-git-send-email-longli@linuxonhyperv.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing it to user-mode | expand |
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:50:50 -0700 longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote: > list_for_each_entry(ndev_ctx, &netvsc_dev_list, list) { > ndev = hv_get_drvdata(ndev_ctx->device_ctx); > - if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) { > - netdev_notice(vf_netdev, > - "falling back to mac addr based matching\n"); > + if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr) || > + ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->dev_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) This part looks like unrelated change. The VF mac address shouldn't change, but if it did don't look at i.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:50:50 -0700 longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote: > @@ -2347,6 +2342,12 @@ static int netvsc_register_vf(struct net_device *vf_netdev) > if (!ndev) > return NOTIFY_DONE; > > + if (event == NETDEV_POST_INIT) { > + /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ > + vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > + } > + > net_device_ctx = netdev_priv(ndev); > netvsc_dev = rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->nvdev); > if (!netvsc_dev || rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->vf_netdev)) > @@ -2753,8 +2754,9 @@ static int netvsc_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, > return NOTIFY_DONE; > > switch (event) { > + case NETDEV_POST_INIT: > case NETDEV_REGISTER: > - return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev); > + return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev, event); Although correct, this is an awkward way to write this. There are two events which call register_vf() but the post init one short circuits and doesn't really register the VF. The code is clearer if flag is set in switch statement. @@ -2206,9 +2206,6 @@ static int netvsc_vf_join(struct net_device *vf_netdev, goto upper_link_failed; } - /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ - vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; - schedule_delayed_work(&ndev_ctx->vf_takeover, VF_TAKEOVER_INT); call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_JOIN, vf_netdev); @@ -2753,6 +2750,10 @@ static int netvsc_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, return NOTIFY_DONE; switch (event) { + case NETDEV_POST_INIT: + /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ + vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; + return NOTIFY_DONE; case NETDEV_REGISTER: return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev); case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing it to user-mode > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:50:50 -0700 > longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote: > > > list_for_each_entry(ndev_ctx, &netvsc_dev_list, list) { > > ndev = hv_get_drvdata(ndev_ctx->device_ctx); > > - if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) > { > > - netdev_notice(vf_netdev, > > - "falling back to mac addr based > matching\n"); > > + if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr) > || > > + ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->dev_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) > > This part looks like unrelated change. > The VF mac address shouldn't change, but if it did don't look at i. At the time of NETDEV_POST_INIT, the perm_addr is not assigned yet (last it was copied from dev_addr when device is registered).
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing it to user-mode > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:50:50 -0700 > longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote: > > > @@ -2347,6 +2342,12 @@ static int netvsc_register_vf(struct net_device > *vf_netdev) > > if (!ndev) > > return NOTIFY_DONE; > > > > + if (event == NETDEV_POST_INIT) { > > + /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ > > + vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; > > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > > + } > > + > > net_device_ctx = netdev_priv(ndev); > > netvsc_dev = rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->nvdev); > > if (!netvsc_dev || rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->vf_netdev)) > > @@ -2753,8 +2754,9 @@ static int netvsc_netdev_event(struct notifier_block > *this, > > return NOTIFY_DONE; > > > > switch (event) { > > + case NETDEV_POST_INIT: > > case NETDEV_REGISTER: > > - return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev); > > + return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev, event); > > Although correct, this is an awkward way to write this. > There are two events which call register_vf() but the post init one short circuits > and doesn't really register the VF. > > The code is clearer if flag is set in switch statement. > I will add a dedicated function to handle NETDEV_POST_INIT. Thanks, Long
diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c index ec77fb9dcf89..045777a4971d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c @@ -2206,9 +2206,6 @@ static int netvsc_vf_join(struct net_device *vf_netdev, goto upper_link_failed; } - /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ - vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; - schedule_delayed_work(&ndev_ctx->vf_takeover, VF_TAKEOVER_INT); call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_JOIN, vf_netdev); @@ -2320,11 +2317,9 @@ static struct net_device *get_netvsc_byslot(const struct net_device *vf_netdev) */ list_for_each_entry(ndev_ctx, &netvsc_dev_list, list) { ndev = hv_get_drvdata(ndev_ctx->device_ctx); - if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) { - netdev_notice(vf_netdev, - "falling back to mac addr based matching\n"); + if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr) || + ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->dev_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) return ndev; - } } netdev_notice(vf_netdev, @@ -2332,7 +2327,7 @@ static struct net_device *get_netvsc_byslot(const struct net_device *vf_netdev) return NULL; } -static int netvsc_register_vf(struct net_device *vf_netdev) +static int netvsc_register_vf(struct net_device *vf_netdev, unsigned long event) { struct net_device_context *net_device_ctx; struct netvsc_device *netvsc_dev; @@ -2347,6 +2342,12 @@ static int netvsc_register_vf(struct net_device *vf_netdev) if (!ndev) return NOTIFY_DONE; + if (event == NETDEV_POST_INIT) { + /* set slave flag before open to prevent IPv6 addrconf */ + vf_netdev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE; + return NOTIFY_DONE; + } + net_device_ctx = netdev_priv(ndev); netvsc_dev = rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->nvdev); if (!netvsc_dev || rtnl_dereference(net_device_ctx->vf_netdev)) @@ -2753,8 +2754,9 @@ static int netvsc_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, return NOTIFY_DONE; switch (event) { + case NETDEV_POST_INIT: case NETDEV_REGISTER: - return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev); + return netvsc_register_vf(event_dev, event); case NETDEV_UNREGISTER: return netvsc_unregister_vf(event_dev); case NETDEV_UP: