Message ID | 20231120065916.374045-1-gaosong@loongson.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/1] tcg/loongarch64: Fix tcg_out_mov() Aborted | expand |
On 20/11/23 07:59, Song Gao wrote: > On LoongArch host, we got an Aborted from tcg_out_mov(). > > qemu-x86_64 configure with '--enable-debug'. > >> (gdb) b /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> Breakpoint 1 at 0x2576f0: file /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc, line 312. >> (gdb) run hello > [...] >> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" hit Breakpoint 1, tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, ret=TCG_REG_V2, >> arg=TCG_REG_V0) at /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> 312 g_assert_not_reached(); >> (gdb) bt >> #0 tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, ret=TCG_REG_V2, arg=TCG_REG_V0) >> at /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> #1 0x000000aaaad0fee0 in tcg_reg_alloc_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, op=0xaaaaf67c20) at ../tcg/tcg.c:4632 >> #2 0x000000aaaad142f4 in tcg_gen_code (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, tb=0xffe8030340 <code_gen_buffer+197328>, >> pc_start=4346094) at ../tcg/tcg.c:6135 > [...] >> (gdb) c >> Continuing. >> ** >> ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: code should not be reached >> Bail out! ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: code should not be reached >> >> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >> 0x000000fff7b1c390 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) q Available since commit af88a28414 ("tcg/loongarch64: Import LSX instructions"), missed when LSX host instruction got enabled in commit 16288ded94 ("tcg/loongarch64: Lower basic tcg vec ops to LSX"). Fixes: 16288ded94 ("tcg/loongarch64: Lower basic tcg vec ops to LSX") Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn> > --- > tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > index a588fb3085..5f68040230 100644 > --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static bool tcg_out_mov(TCGContext *s, TCGType type, TCGReg ret, TCGReg arg) > */ > tcg_out_opc_or(s, ret, arg, TCG_REG_ZERO); > break; > + case TCG_TYPE_V128: > + tcg_out_opc_vaddi_du(s, ret, arg, 0); > + break; > default: > g_assert_not_reached(); > }
On 11/19/23 22:59, Song Gao wrote: > On LoongArch host, we got an Aborted from tcg_out_mov(). > > qemu-x86_64 configure with '--enable-debug'. > >> (gdb) b /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> Breakpoint 1 at 0x2576f0: file /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc, line 312. >> (gdb) run hello > [...] >> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" hit Breakpoint 1, tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, ret=TCG_REG_V2, >> arg=TCG_REG_V0) at /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> 312 g_assert_not_reached(); >> (gdb) bt >> #0 tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, ret=TCG_REG_V2, arg=TCG_REG_V0) >> at /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >> #1 0x000000aaaad0fee0 in tcg_reg_alloc_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, op=0xaaaaf67c20) at ../tcg/tcg.c:4632 >> #2 0x000000aaaad142f4 in tcg_gen_code (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, tb=0xffe8030340 <code_gen_buffer+197328>, >> pc_start=4346094) at ../tcg/tcg.c:6135 > [...] >> (gdb) c >> Continuing. >> ** >> ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: code should not be reached >> Bail out! ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: code should not be reached >> >> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >> 0x000000fff7b1c390 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) q > > Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn> > --- > tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > index a588fb3085..5f68040230 100644 > --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc > @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static bool tcg_out_mov(TCGContext *s, TCGType type, TCGReg ret, TCGReg arg) > */ > tcg_out_opc_or(s, ret, arg, TCG_REG_ZERO); > break; > + case TCG_TYPE_V128: > + tcg_out_opc_vaddi_du(s, ret, arg, 0); > + break; Is add with immediate zero really the canonical alias for "vector move"? There is often some form that is recommended by the architecture, so that it may be recognized for register renaming. Usually it is some form of logic instruction, not arithmetic. I see that LLVM emits "vori.b dst, src, 0" for this case. Regardless, this patch works to fix the assert so, Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
在 2023/11/20 下午11:59, Richard Henderson 写道: > On 11/19/23 22:59, Song Gao wrote: >> On LoongArch host, we got an Aborted from tcg_out_mov(). >> >> qemu-x86_64 configure with '--enable-debug'. >> >>> (gdb) b /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >>> Breakpoint 1 at 0x2576f0: file >>> /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc, line 312. >>> (gdb) run hello >> [...] >>> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" hit Breakpoint 1, tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 >>> <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, ret=TCG_REG_V2, >>> arg=TCG_REG_V0) at >>> /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >>> 312 g_assert_not_reached(); >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 tcg_out_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 <tcg_init_ctx>, type=TCG_TYPE_V128, >>> ret=TCG_REG_V2, arg=TCG_REG_V0) >>> at /home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312 >>> #1 0x000000aaaad0fee0 in tcg_reg_alloc_mov (s=0xaaaae91760 >>> <tcg_init_ctx>, op=0xaaaaf67c20) at ../tcg/tcg.c:4632 >>> #2 0x000000aaaad142f4 in tcg_gen_code (s=0xaaaae91760 >>> <tcg_init_ctx>, tb=0xffe8030340 <code_gen_buffer+197328>, >>> pc_start=4346094) at ../tcg/tcg.c:6135 >> [...] >>> (gdb) c >>> Continuing. >>> ** >>> ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: >>> code should not be reached >>> Bail out! >>> ERROR:/home1/gaosong/code/qemu/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc:312:tcg_out_mov: >>> code should not be reached >>> >>> Thread 1 "qemu-x86_64" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >>> 0x000000fff7b1c390 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >>> (gdb) q >> >> Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn> >> --- >> tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc >> b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc >> index a588fb3085..5f68040230 100644 >> --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc >> +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc >> @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static bool tcg_out_mov(TCGContext *s, TCGType >> type, TCGReg ret, TCGReg arg) >> */ >> tcg_out_opc_or(s, ret, arg, TCG_REG_ZERO); >> break; >> + case TCG_TYPE_V128: >> + tcg_out_opc_vaddi_du(s, ret, arg, 0); >> + break; > > Is add with immediate zero really the canonical alias for "vector move"? > > There is often some form that is recommended by the architecture, so > that it may be recognized for register renaming. Usually it is some > form of logic instruction, not arithmetic. I see that LLVM emits > "vori.b dst, src, 0" for this case. > adfadf you are right, I see the insn 'mov ' opcode is '00150000'. it is 'or dst, src, zero'. Thanks. Song Gao > Regardless, this patch works to fix the assert so, > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > > > r~
diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc index a588fb3085..5f68040230 100644 --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static bool tcg_out_mov(TCGContext *s, TCGType type, TCGReg ret, TCGReg arg) */ tcg_out_opc_or(s, ret, arg, TCG_REG_ZERO); break; + case TCG_TYPE_V128: + tcg_out_opc_vaddi_du(s, ret, arg, 0); + break; default: g_assert_not_reached(); }